Maryland Digital Advertising Tax Invalidated – Now What?

Charles Maniace
October 17, 2022

In a development that should be a surprise to almost no one, a state district court judge invalidated Maryland’s digital advertising tax, which was slated to apply as of January 1, 2022, with the first filing and remittance due on December 31, 2022.

By way of recap, in 2021, Maryland passed legislation applying a special gross receipts tax on revenue earned from the provision of digital advertising services. “Digital advertising” being defined as “advertisement services on a digital interface, including advertisements in the form of banner advertising, search engine advertising, interstitial advertising, and other comparable advertising services.” The bill contained a formula that would determine how much of a particular company’s advertising revenue should be apportioned to Maryland and the applicable tax rate was determined based on the taxpayer’s global annual gross revenue.

Challenges were immediately filed in both federal court and the Maryland state court system. Fundamentally, all the lawsuits contend that the law violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the First Amendment and the Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act (PITFA).

Even for a sales tax novice, the PITFA challenge is easy to understand. Under PITFA, states are precluded from taxing commerce that takes place over the internet in a way that’s more expansive than the same type of transactions taking place through traditional commerce channels. In other words, states can’t discriminate against internet commerce. Therefore, since Maryland does not tax traditional advertising services (e.g., billboards, magazine ads, etc.), PITFA precludes them from taxing internet advertising.

When the bill was passed, the Maryland Attorney General authored what can only fairly be described as a contorted analysis through which he concluded that the law could pass Constitutional muster. He said that the tax could be viewed as non-discriminatory against internet commerce since it applies equally no matter how the internet advertising might be purchased (over the phone, in person, over the internet, etc.). Even though a written order has yet been issued by the district court judge, it’s clear that this argument did not hold sway as the court ruled the law indeed violated PITFA.

What does this mean for other states’ digital advertising taxes?

While this lower court ruling will undoubtedly be appealed and the federal court action has yet to reach its conclusion, the interesting question right now is what this decision will mean to other states considering similar measures. In the last year or so, the question about how to apply taxes to digital transactions has received heightened attention across the country. Just last year, there were proposals in 17 states that would have expanded taxes on “big tech” including digital advertising (like Maryland’s), social media advertising and data mining.

Proposals to tax digital advertising have support on both sides of the political aisle. On the left, the perception exists that technology companies earn enormous profits and some of those profits should be used to fund education. On the right (at least in some quarters) there is a desire to punish tech firms for “de-platforming” our former president. From a non-partisan perspective, an argument could be made that digital advertising should be taxed. Companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter don’t make money from licensing software and services. We don’t pay to use Google and we’d probably have a collective freak-out if Google decided to charge people on a per-search basis. Rather, these companies offer their services for free and make their money by selling advertising. So, where other technology companies would pay sales tax on their software license fees or other charges, companies relying on advertising for the bulk of their revenue escape taxation. However, the plain and simple fact remains that PITFA precludes taxing digital advertising unless equivalent taxes against traditional advertising are likewise levied.

While none of these other bills were enacted into law apart from Maryland, things got close in states such as Connecticut and in the District of Columbia. It seems likely that states will try again in current and future legislative sessions. However, it likewise seems clear that states must consider the constitutional infirmities of the Maryland law as they work to draft new bills to generate additional tax revenue from tech giants.

Take Action

Curious about sales tax and digital assets? Check out our ebook to learn more.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Charles Maniace

Chuck is Vice President –Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, he leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals that provide the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 20-year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC, Bloomberg and more. Chuck has also been named to the Accounting Today list of Top 100 Most Influential People four times.
Share this post

North America ShipCompliant
February 22, 2024
Is Beverage Alcohol Self-Distribution the Next Big Thing?

A number of recent lawsuits filed by beverage alcohol producers have raised new interest in self-distribution rights, an often-overlooked area of the industry. Self-distribution is when a supplier of alcohol, such as an importer or domestic manufacturer, is authorized to sell directly to retailers without having to work with a wholesaler to get their products […]

February 20, 2024
Why the Market is Ready for the Sovos Compliance Cloud

The emergence of digital transformation fundamentally changed how many governments and tax authorities around the world handle modern tax and compliance. What is unique about this process is that each individual government operates under its own set of rules, and global businesses are expected to keep up. In their efforts to address compliance, ironically, many […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
February 16, 2024
ACA Reporting Deadlines and More for Tax Year 2023

Affordable Care Act (ACA) reporting has started for tax year 2023. ACA reporting can quickly become complicated and costly with IRS penalties if your business does not have an efficient process in place. Although regulations have generally stayed the same for this reporting season, there are some important updates all businesses should be aware of […]

North America Unclaimed Property
February 16, 2024
Consequences of Non-Compliance with Unclaimed Property Laws

Building and maintaining a program to ensure compliance with the ever-changing unclaimed property laws is challenging, costly and time consuming. As a result, many companies put off or delay coming into compliance or do not put enough resources into creating a robust program. Those delays, erratic reporting and even ignorance that unclaimed property laws exist […]

North America ShipCompliant
February 16, 2024
Most Popular Wine Varietals Shipped in 2023 and More

Last month, Sovos ShipCompliant and WineBusiness Analytics released the 2024 Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report, marking the fourteenth consecutive collaboration between the two companies. Alex Koral and Andrew Adams presented an overview of the data and analysis from the report, highlighting key trends and statistics. Here, we summarize some of the noteworthy findings starting with the […]