Beyond Tax Reliefs: The Impact of Covid-19 on E-Archiving

Gabriel Pezzato
April 1, 2020

The economic impact and consequences of coronavirus are unprecedented as it spreads across different countries. To protect their markets, many countries have reacted by loosening obligations and lowering rates. While most of these initiatives have an immediate impact on a business’s cashflow and are welcome they also, in many cases, have a long-term impact on the archive period for fiscal documents. 

The implications for e-archiving

Among the relief measures being taken, tax authorities have temporarily closed their tax offices and stopped tax audits. In parallel – and motivated by the interruption of tax authorities’ activities – many countries have extended their statute of limitations (aka periods of prescription or decadence in civil law countries). In other words, the period held by tax authorities to audit businesses and enforce fiscal obligations is quietly being extended. So far, Italy, Spain, and Portugal have taken this step.

The statute of limitations is generally associated with storage periods of probatory documents. But storage periods and statute of limitations are occasionally regulated by different laws. Consequently, while these periods coincide in some countries, in many others the extension of the statute of limitations directly impacts storage periods which are consequently prolonged. For this reason, changes in statutory periods mean taxpayers must analyze such initiatives and their impact on the storage period of fiscal documents.

Expanding limitation periods can impact local and multinational businesses alike. Local businesses may have to create a distinct storage period for fiscal documents created up until a certain date. Multinationals however face the additional challenge of keeping track of, interpreting and implementing new laws for multiple countries.  Many of the new rules are often passed quickly leaving little time for companies to prepare and comply.

A fragmented approach

Statutes of limitations differ from country to country.  They are the result of decades, if not centuries, of legislative and judicial developments. Consequently, statutory periods cannot be interpreted without their legal context. There are also variations on the legal mechanism to change statutory periods. In some countries, the time-barrier can be expanded through a decree from the executive power or even from the tax authority itself. In other States, a complex legislative process through the local parliament is necessary. Italy, for instance, leveraged a law from 2015 to expand its statute of limitations, while Spain and Portugal passed new laws on this subject.

Keeping track of these legislative changes can be daunting and time consuming.  It requires a deep understanding of local laws to be interpreted and applied correctly, and their impact on tax obligations.

So, while Governments around the world implement tax measures to protect their economy and support local businesses, taxpayers cannot just relax and benefit from these financial reliefs.  They must keep up to date and informed of changing requirements when it comes to tax compliance.

Take Action

Sovos provides eArchiving solutions for clients in over 50 countries. Find out more and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Gabriel Pezzato

Gabriel Pezzato is a Regulatory Counsel at Sovos. Based in Stockholm and originally from Brazil, Gabriel’s background is in tax, corporate and administrative law. Gabriel earned a Law degree and a specialization degree in Tax Law in his home country and has a master’s degree in International and European Tax Law from Uppsala University (Sweden).
Share This Post
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 20, 2021
Fiscal Representation Post-Brexit – Requirements for UK Companies Trading in the EU

Non-EU companies are required to appoint a Fiscal Representative in order to be registered for VAT in many Member States. Following the end of the Brexit transition agreement on 31 December 2021, this was a consideration for UK companies who wanted to remain registered or had to register as a result of changes to supply […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 16, 2021
French E-invoicing Mandate Update: Government Revises Rollout Schedule

When the French Tax Authority published its report last fall, unveiling the continuous transaction control (CTC) plans for France, we questioned whether it would be possible to finalise all the details of this system in less than a year, to allow sufficient time for businesses to adapt. Although the French Treasury (DGFiP) has made good […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 16, 2021
Saudi Arabia’s E-Invoicing Mandate is Fast Approaching

The Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority (ZATCA) announced the finalised rules for the Saudi Arabia e-invoicing system earlier this year, announcing plans for two main phases for the new e-invoicing system. The first phase of the Saudi Arabia e-invoicing system is set to go live from 4 December 2021. With the mandate just around the […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 15, 2021
EU E-Commerce VAT Package FAQs: Understanding Marketplace Liability

The EU E-Commerce VAT Package is here. The new schemes, One Stop Shop (OSS) and Import One Stop Shop (IOSS) bring significant changes to VAT treatment and reporting mechanisms for sales to private individuals in the EU. Our recent webinar, Back to Basics: The EU E-Commerce VAT Package, discussed the basic principles of the three […]

EMEA IPT
September 15, 2021
IPT Compliance in the UK: What Does the Metropolitan Fire Brigade Act Mean for Insurers in Greater London?

IPT compliance is complex, especially when insurers are writing across multiple regions, jurisdictions or boroughs.