,

As COVID-19 Changes the Retail Landscape, are SMBs Ready for the Sales Tax Ramifications?

Charles Maniace
April 10, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed the way in which commerce is conducted in the United States and around the world. Based on current restrictions, consumers have had no other choice but to explore ecommerce options to fulfill needs for all but the most essential items and services.

In turn, smaller and mid-sized businesses that maybe had a small online presence before the outbreak have been ramping up efforts to fulfill orders and maintain cash flow during a period of forced closure. While online sales have provided an excellent way for them to keep the businesses operating in the near-term, there may be some longer-term ramifications that they may be unaware of or unprepared to manage.

Ecommerce has been steadily on the rise since the early 1990’s, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce, consumers spent $601.75 billion online with U.S. merchants in 2019, up 14.9% from $523.64 billion in 2018. Before the onset of COVID-19 many estimates had predicted that more than 230 million U.S. consumers would be expected to be shopping online by 2021. Based on current circumstances, we can only project that the number of shoppers and the amount they spend in 2020 will be considerably higher than anticipated.

Here is where the complexity for many businesses unfamiliar with the sales tax ramifications of expanded ecommerce activity comes into play. It used to be that a business needed to have a physical presence in a state to demand that a business collect and remit sales tax. Under the old rules, many small to mid-size businesses who had no connection with a state other than the fact they were shipping orders to in-state customers, had no sales tax collection and remittance obligations.

However, that all changed on June 21, 2018, when the United States Supreme Court ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair. The decision granted states the authority to mandate that businesses collect, and remit sales taxes based solely on economic activity, so long as the requirement did not represent an “undue burden. “

This decision vastly expanded what constitutes nexus for business. Nexus is no longer solely determined by your physical presence in a state. Your nexus obligations can now also be based on the sales revenue and transaction volume you generate in each state, regardless of your physical presence. This ruling established a massive opportunity for states to generate revenue and one that they are taking full advantage of, including the use of technology to enable aggressive enforcement. Today, virtually every state that imposes a sales tax (except for Missouri and Florida) has changed their law to capture e-commerce sellers, with many sates defining what constitutes economic nexus a little differently. In most states, it doesn’t take much. For example, many jurisdictions will begin imposing tax obligations on a seller if they have more than 200 transactions or $100,000 in gross sales to customers in their state.

Today’s circumstances have created many newly minted e-commerce companies to meet the demand for non-essential goods and to keep revenue streams moving. As a result, the number of companies crossing nexus thresholds for states is expected to sharply spike. While states have been adjusting remittance and filing obligations to provide relief in the short-term, re-establishing sources of revenue will be a priority for all governments once normalcy returns.

This means sellers will be held accountable for tax compliance at some point. Understanding the rules and your organizations obligations thereunder is a critical step in keeping your company safe. The last thing you need at this point is an extended and costly audit leading to a major assessment including penalties and interest.

For those already collecting and remitting sales tax, Sovos is tracking all of the COVID-19 driven sales tax changes. This is updated daily, so be sure to check back frequently.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Charles Maniace

Chuck is Vice President –Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, he leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals that provide the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 20-year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC, Bloomberg and more. Chuck has also been named to the Accounting Today list of Top 100 Most Influential People four times.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
May 25, 2023
Out-of-State Breweries Gain Self Distribution, DtC Rights in Oregon

Under a settlement agreement, breweries located outside of Oregon now have more options for selling into the Beaver State, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping and self-distribution to retailers. The settlement arose out of a lawsuit filed by a group of Washington breweries last year challenging Oregon laws that limited beer self-distribution to in-state breweries and DtC […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2023
VAT and Art: What you need to know

Significant inflation increases have impacted most of the world’s economies, with the UK still above 10% in 2023. This increase means a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Together with increases in the cost of raw materials, this has created uncertainty regarding growth of entire industrial departments and reduced profit margins for companies. The […]

North America ShipCompliant
May 23, 2023
Top 5 Myths Surrounding Retailer Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers Politics breed myths. This has always been the case as politics is, at its most fundamental, a form of storytelling. So it should be no surprise that myths have arisen as various elements of the wine industry have fought against consumers and specialty wine retailer seeking […]

EMEA IPT
May 23, 2023
IPT: Location of Risk and Territoriality

Much of the discussion on the Location of Risk triggering a country’s entitlement to levy insurance premium tax (IPT) and parafiscal charges focuses on the rules for different types of insurance. European Union (EU) Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) set out these rules. However, a related topic of growing importance in this area concerns territoriality, i.e. […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
May 23, 2023
Japan: New e-Invoice Retention Requirements

Japan’s new e-invoice retention requirements are part of the country’s latest Electronic Record Retention Law (ERRL) reform. Along with measures such as the Qualified Invoice System (QIS) and the possibility to issue and send invoices electronically via PEPPOL, Japan is implementing different indirect tax control measures, seeking to reduce tax evasion and promote digital transformation. […]