India Amends E-Invoicing Rules

Selin Adler Ring
April 1, 2020

India’s e-invoicing reform has been introduced as a very important step towards digitizing the country´s tax controls. Even though the reform has been under discussion for more than a year, the initial roll-out for the implementation process would have been a challenge for all stakeholders which was finally set to begin mandatorily on 1 April 2020 for large businesses. 

After the trial period which started in January of this year, it was clear that the infrastructure of the portal, taxpayers, as well as the system in general weren’t mature enough to move to the mandatory stage of the e-invoice reform. Therefore, the expected decision following the meeting of the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) was announced on 14 March: to postpone the deadline for mandatory invoice clearance. The decision was not only deferring the mandatory deadline but also exempting certain taxpayers from the scope of the upcoming mandate.

Since this decision, the Indian government passed the changes with the Notification numbered 13/2020 on 21 March. The latest Notification is amending the previously enacted Notification numbered 70/2019 that tackled e-invoicing for the first time.

So, what’s changed?

The latest Notification postponed the roll-out date for mandatory invoice clearance from 1 April 2020 to 1 October 2020. There is no change in the threshold limit to adopt invoice clearance mandatorily, however there are certain businesses exempted from the scope depending on the sector they operate in. According to the latest Notification, taxpayers that are mentioned in 2, 3, 4 and 4(a) of article 54 of CGST 2017 are no longer in scope for the e-invoicing mandate.

And, what’s next?

The reason behind the postponement of the deadline was because the reform wasn’t ready to be rolled out. Within the coming days the GSTN need to provide clarity on many different aspects of their e-invoicing reform and improve their systems. Similarly, taxpayers must still be made fully aware of all details for the upcoming changes and the clarifications that will be provided by the Indian authorities. Unless these updates are provided in good time, another delay cannot be ruled out which would not be a big surprise for many stakeholders.

Take Action

Sovos has more than a decade of experience keeping clients up to date with e-invoicing mandates all over the world.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Selin Adler Ring

Selin is Regulatory Counsel at Sovos. Based in Stockholm and originally from Turkey, Selin’s background is in corporate and commercial law, and currently specializes in global e-invoicing compliance. Selin earned a Law degree in her home country and has a master’s degree in Law and Economics.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 2, 2020
Italian Tax Controls: Five Key Facts to Know Before the New Year

While Italy rolled out its continuous transaction controls (CTC) reform in 2019, 2020 has been a year of expansion. Italian authorities plan to leverage all potential benefits of the successful implementation of the country’s central e-invoicing platform. Many of the updates will either be launched or enforced in the upcoming year, or later in 2022. […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
December 1, 2020
Unclaimed Property Dormancy Periods by State: What You Need to Know

Understanding unclaimed property dormancy periods by state and executing the appropriate decisions can make or break your company’s unclaimed property program. This is due primarily to the fact that each state has varying dormancy periods. To complicate matters even further, each state has specific dormancy periods for each corresponding property type. As a result, determining […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
How Was the Nevada Economic Nexus Law Modified?

When the Supreme Court ruled on South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., remote sellers and marketplace facilitators across the country had to make changes in how they collected and remitted sales tax. The Nevada economic nexus law is one example of a state modifying its requirements for both remote sellers and marketplace facilitators in relation to […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Does Oregon Have Economic Nexus Rules?

Following the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, the majority of states enacted legislation on how remote sellers and marketplace facilitators must collect and remit sales tax. However, Oregon has no economic nexus because it does not have a sales tax. Enforcement date: N/A Sales/transactions threshold: N/A Measurement period: N/A Included transactions/sales: N/A When You […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Is There a Missouri Economic Nexus Sales Tax?

After the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, almost every state incorporated changes to how remote sellers must collect and remit sales tax. However, Missouri has not yet finalized legislation relating to an economic nexus sales tax. While Missouri has introduced several bills aimed at enacting economic nexus rules, none have become law. But this […]