State of Change: New York Shifts 1099-R Reconciliation from Annual to Quarterly Basis

Clark Sells
July 24, 2018

New York recently changed its requirements for validating and reconciling 1099-R data, providing another example of how states are changing regulations in order collect revenue more accurately and more quickly. Financial institutions will likely need to adjust their processes in response.

Institutions must file a form 1099-R for each person who received a distribution of $10 or more from programs such as profit-sharing or retirement plans, IRAs, annuities, pensions, insurance contracts and survivor income benefit plans.

Move from annual to quarterly reconciling of 1099-R information

Current rules in New York require paying institutions to submit a withholding filing on a quarterly basis to confirm timely and complete payments. In the fourth quarter of the year, payers add 1099-R information for the whole tax year in part C, section D and E of form NYS-45 in order to reconcile withholding payments, returns, and 1099-R information reporting. State revenue officials then review all four quarters of NYS-45 to make sure payments match those reported on form 1099-R.

However, the new regulation, which will take effect in January, will require payers to send 1099-R forms to the State of New York to satisfy part C of each quarterly filing. Essentially, the new rule requires organizations to reconcile 1099-Rs and withholding payments on a quarterly basis rather than on an annual basis.

Bringing accounting and tax departments together with a single solution

That could be a problem for financial institutions. In many operations, the accounting department handles payments and withholding returns, while the tax department deals with 1099-R information reporting. Unfortunately, the two departments often operate in silos, separated from each other due to having to follow different regulatory requirements in different states.

As a result, accounting and tax often fail to collaborate, and they use two different source systems for data. Using separate systems makes reconciling any differences in forms difficult and time-consuming when carried out on an annual basis. The process will be even more complex on a quarterly basis for reporting in the massive New York jurisdiction, as accounting and tax will have to work together both more frequently and more closely.

Payers need to consolidate accounting and tax reporting processes into one unified reporting solution, which will provide a consistent source for form data. A single solution will also enable companies to complete reconciliation and reporting more quickly and accurately, with less effort and using fewer employee resources.

A trend of states streamlining revenue collection

New York is not the first state to shift to requiring quarterly 1099-R reconciliation. California and Maine have had similar regulations in place for years. In a broader trend, states are changing requirements and moving up deadlines in an effort to collect revenue more quickly and accurately. For example, after the IRS moved deadlines for some 1099 forms up for tax year 2017, a group of states did the same. In most states, 1099-MISC with nonemployee compensation and W-2 forms are due by January 31.

With states needing revenue, more changes that bring complexity to the reporting process for payers are likely to emerge.

Take Action

Sovos has decades of experience consolidating reporting data and handling change in 1099 reporting processes for clients. Learn more or contact Sovos for more information.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Clark Sells

Share This Post

E-Invoicing Compliance
June 24, 2019
Indian GST Council Confirms Plan to Roll out B2B E-invoicing System

Last week, the Indian GST Council convened for its 35th session, this time chaired by the recently appointed finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman. As expected, the topic of a nationwide mandatory B2B e-invoicing system was on the agenda, and the GST council confirmed two important principles: Scope: The e-invoicing system will cover only B2B transactions to […]

E-Invoicing Compliance Tax Compliance
June 20, 2019
Is India on a Path toward Mandatory B2B E-invoicing?

As more and more countries across the world depend on VAT, GST or other indirect taxes as the single most significant source of public revenue, governments are increasingly asking themselves what technical means they can use to ensure that they maximize the collection of the taxes due under the new tax regimes. India is the […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 20, 2019
From E-invoicing to E-ordering: New Mandate Coming to Italy in October

Italy has been at the forefront of B2G e-invoicing in Europe ever since the central e-invoicing platform SDI (Sistema di Interscambio) was rolled out and made mandatory for all suppliers to the public sector in 2014. While a number of its European neighbors are slowly catching up, Italy is continuing to improve the integration of […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 19, 2019
SAF-T – Where Are We Now?

Anyone who has been closely following SAF-T announcements over the past few years may be forgiven for thinking that it all seems rather like Groundhog Day.  Commencement dates and reporting requirements have been announced and subsequently amended and re-announced as the respective countries re-evaluate their needs and the readiness of companies to provide the data […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
June 17, 2019
South Dakota v. Wayfair One Year Later – Retrospective and Look Ahead Webinar

Since the groundbreaking Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair last June, tax compliance requirements of sellers have undergone a seismic shift. In recent months, we have also witnessed a series of after-shocks directed at setting the foundation for U.S. sales tax compliance in the modern age. In a live webinar and Q&A, “South […]