What is Indirect Representation, and How Does it Affect UK Businesses?

Lorenza Barone
June 28, 2022

According to European Customs Law, non-EU established businesses must appoint a representative for customs purposes when importing goods into the EU. In particular, the Union Customs Code establishes that non-EU resident businesses must appoint an indirect representative.

At the end of the Brexit transitionary period, many UK businesses suddenly needed to appoint an indirect representative to clear goods into the EU. In this article, we will look in further detail at this requirement’s challenges.

Who can act as an indirect representative?

Indirect representation implies that agents are jointly and severally liable for any customs debt (import or export duties), which is why it’s harder for businesses to find freight companies and customs brokers willing to act on their behalf than for direct representation imports.

The conditions to be an indirect representative are that the customs agent must have a registered office or permanent establishment in the EU. An agent would require a Power of Attorney that enables them to act for the company. The main characteristic of indirect representation is that the agent will act in their own name but on behalf of the company that appointed them, essentially transferring the rights and obligations of customs procedures to the representative.

On the other hand, agents act in the name and on behalf of the company in direct representation.

Joint responsibility of the indirect representative

In addition to the customs implications, agents acting as the importer of record or declarant may also be considered liable for complying with regulatory requirements. For example, any error in the declarations (ex. Article 77 paragraph 3 Union Customs Code (UCC), if the agent was aware of incorrect information or if they “should have known better”).

The European Court of Justice recently expressed its opinion on this matter with the ruling on the case C-714/20, UI Srl. This ruling determined that the indirect representative is jointly and severally liable from a customs law perspective, but not for VAT (contrary to a previous interpretation of Article 77 (3) UCC). The court specified that it’s up to the Member States to expressly determine if other persons, such as indirect representatives, may be considered jointly and severally liable for VAT of their importer clients. However, according to the principle of legal certainty, this should be clearly expressed in the local legislation before courts can enforce said responsibility.

What are the options for UK businesses?

  • Making the final client importer of records using DAP Incoterms for sales rather than DDP (Delivered Duty Paid basis – where the seller is responsible for clearing the goods and payment of duties and taxes amongst other obligations). This will imply that the importing obligations are shifted to the buyer receiving the goods in the importing country. In practice, however, this may not be an option considering the additional administrative and economic burden this will impose on end customers.
  • To establish a presence in the EU. For example, setting up a subsidiary that can act as the importer of record, then find a customs agent that can act as a direct representative.
  • Appoint a representative in specific countries, such as the Netherlands, where the application for an Article 23 import license (which allows applying a reverse charge to the imports reported) may further diminish the representative’s liability. In conjunction with the recent decision of the European Court of Justice, this may make it easier for UK businesses to find an agent willing to represent them indirectly and limit fees and guarantees that they may be required to provide.

For these options, each alternative solution will have economic and administrative implications to be considered. It is recommended that businesses carefully review their overall strategy before deciding what can be adjusted to comply with customs formalities.

Take Action

Contact Sovos’ team of  VAT experts for help with meeting VAT compliance obligations.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Lorenza Barone

Lorenza is a senior consultant within Sovos’ Audit and VAT Recovery team. She studied Law in Italy before moving to the UK and has worked for Sovos since 2018.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
March 30, 2023
Unique Tax Considerations for DtC Wine Shippers

Taxes are one of the primary compliance concerns for direct-to-consumer (DtC) shippers of wine, and one of the more complex ones. The 47 states, plus D.C., that permit DtC shipping of alcohol want to ensure there is parity between alcohol sold in-state and any coming from out-of-state sources. So, if a bottle of wine is […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 30, 2023
4 Tips to Avoid Inaccurate Direct State Reporting

Direct state reporting obligations can quickly become complicated for any business, and if done incorrectly, state penalties can add up rapidly. Direct state reporting has been required by many states for decades, however, only recently have we seen states increase enforcement surrounding their reporting requirements. States that participate in the Combined Federal State Filing (CF/SF) […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 27, 2023
Working Toward a Larger Kentucky DtC Spirits Channel – And Beyond

Kentucky just entered its third year of DtC alcohol shipping, opening doors for wineries, breweries and distilleries to expand their product reach. The change was especially welcomed by the Kentucky Distillers’ Association (KDA), which helped craft and guide the landmark DtC bill in 2020 that established these permissions. Founded in 1880, the KDA is the […]

Latin America Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
March 22, 2023
Argentina: New Perception VAT Regime on Sale of Food and Products for Human Consumption

Argentina has recently expanded its perception VAT (Value Added Tax) collection regime to ensure efficient tax administration. It has included selling food and other products for human consumption, beverages, personal hygiene, and cleaning items under its scope. The Argentinian Federal Administration of Public Revenue (AFIP) established this through Resolution No. 5329/2023 in early February 2023. […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 22, 2023
What is the Combined Federal State Filing (CF/SF) Program?

The IRS created the Combined Federal State Filing (CF/SF) program more than 20 years ago to help alleviate the administrative burdens on small businesses reporting 1099 information to states. This program integrates federal and state filings. The IRS uses information filed in federal filings and then forwards relevant information to states on a business’ behalf. […]