North America

Location of Risk: Goods in Transit Insurance Premium Tax

Russell Brown
October 1, 2021

This blog was last updated on March 1, 2024

Goods in transit insurance is defined in the Solvency II Directive 2009/138/EC (25 November 2009) within Annex I Classes of Non-Life Insurance under class 7. It includes merchandise, baggage, and all other goods and the insurance relates to all damage to or loss of goods in transit or baggage, irrespective of the form of transport.

This is quite a wide definition and covers transit over land either by road or rail, or by air or sea, where in the latter cases these coverages are called aviation or marine cargo.

Location of risk for goods in transit

In most cases, the location of risk for insurance premium tax (IPT) purposes will be where the goods are situated, but in the European Economic Area (EEA) this is not the case.

Article 157 Taxes on premiums of the Solvency II Directive makes it clear that moveable property contained in a building situated within the territory of a Member State shall be considered as a risk situated in that Member State, even where the building and its contents are not covered by the same insurance policy, unless the moveable property relates to goods in commercial transit.

In these scenarios, the location of risk defaults back to the general location of risk rules outlined in Article 13 (13) d) of the Solvency II Directive and is taxed in the Member State where the policyholder is resident. This will mean that if the policyholder is a legal person, then this will be where they have their establishment and where the location of risk from both a tax and regulatory position are aligned.

This is the case irrespective of whether the goods are in domestic or international transit. Goods are considered to be in international transit when their movement begins or ends outside of the territory. It can be necessary to apportion premiums in some cases if a policy covers both goods in domestic and international transit, as international transit cover is commonly exempt from IPT in many territories, whilst the domestic element is subject to IPT.

However, it can also be the case that in some non-EEA countries, it’s possible that the location of the policyholder’s establishment or habitual residence can create a location of risk irrespective of where the goods are physically located. Therefore, if the moveable property is in a different territory from the policyholder’s establishment or habitual residence, then it is possible that there may be two locations of risk for regulatory or tax purposes.

Storage insurance location of risk considerations

Determining location of risk can be difficult if it is unclear how long the moveable property will be kept in a territory.

It’s very common for storage insurance covering all physical damage to moveable property to be included with goods in transit insurance. This will usually become effective when it is in storage for more than 60 days. This time limit is the market practice for determining that it is no longer a goods in transit risk and has become a property risk under regulatory classes 8 (fire and natural forces) and 9 (other damage to property) instead.

Within the EEA, this can lead to variations in the location of risk. From a regulatory perspective the location of risk remains where the policyholder has their establishment or habitual residence whereas from a tax perspective the location of risk has now become where the moveable property is located as per Article 157 of the Solvency II Directive.

In effect, this means that when an insurer is arranging a policy containing goods in transit and storage cover they need to know where the moveable property is being stored, including if this is at third party warehouses, and ideally how long it will be there to ensure that they tax the policy correctly with regards to IPT.

In cases where the period of storage is uncertain in a country, then the default tax position used by insurers is to fall back on where the policyholder has their establishment or habitual residence. If it subsequently becomes clear that the moveable property has been in storage for more than 60 days in a territory, then a mid-term adjustment should be made to ensure that IPT is paid correctly in the territories concerned.

Take Action

Get in touch about the benefits a managed service provider can offer to ease your IPT compliance burden.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Russell Brown

As senior consulting manager, Russell joined Sovos in 2021. A career spent in insurance premium taxes on global insurance programmes has given him many years of experience in handling compliance and advisory challenges from location of risk and IPT liability to co-insurance and financial interest clause cover. He has worked for financial service providers EY and TMF and more recently as head of indirect taxes at Tokio Marine HCC. He has been a member of both the ABI and IUA Indirect Tax Working Groups as well as being an active participant in regular Lloyd’s Indirect Tax Forums.
Share this post

North America Tax Information Reporting
July 7, 2025
The Hidden Cost of the One Big Beautiful Bill: Why Raising Tax Reporting Thresholds Could Cost America Billions

This blog was last updated on July 7, 2025 In the whirlwind of tax policy changes sweeping through Congress, one provision of the recently passed “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB) has quietly slipped through with minimal public scrutiny, despite its potentially massive fiscal impact. The bill increases the reporting threshold for Forms 1099-NEC and 1099-MISC […]

ShipCompliant Wine Summit
North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2025
The 20th Annual Sovos ShipCompliant Wine Summit: Top Takeaways

This blog was last updated on July 3, 2025 For 20 years, the Sovos ShipCompliant Wine Summit has been about gathering winery professionals with the authorities and leaders who make the industry move. At this year’s Wine Summit, attendees heard directly from the regulators, attorneys and brand leaders shaping the future of the wine industry. […]

E-Invoicing Compliance North America
July 1, 2025
SOVOS + KPMG Blog Series: Part 1

This blog was last updated on July 4, 2025 The Global E-Invoicing Revolution: What U.S. Multinationals Need to Know By Paula Smith, Managing Director, Indirect Tax Technology Practice, KPMG LLP; Lauren Tallman, Global Invoicing Specialist and Senior Manager, KPMG LLP; and Christiaan Van Der Valk, General Manager, Indirect Tax, Sovos    If you’re a financial […]

natural catastrophe insurance in iceland
IPT North America
June 23, 2025
Treatment of Natural Catastrophe Insurance in Iceland

This blog was last updated on June 23, 2025 Iceland holds a unique and critical position regarding natural catastrophes due to its extraordinary geography and climate. Situated on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the country is one of the most volcanically and seismically active regions in the world, with frequent eruptions, earthquakes, and geothermal activity. Its mountainous […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
June 11, 2025
IRS FIRE System Sunset: What the IRIS Transition Means for Filers

This blog was last updated on June 16, 2025 The IRS has officially confirmed a plan to sunset the FIRE system, marking one of the most significant transformations in information return filing in decades. After serving as the backbone of electronic tax reporting since the 1980s, the Filing Information Returns Electronically (FIRE) system will be […]

See for yourself how the Sovos Compliance Cloud can meet your business' unique tax compliance challenges.
Book a Demo
© 2025 Sovos Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved.
Why Sovos?
Resources
About
Products
Indirect Tax Suite
Information Reporting and Withholding Suite
Specialty Products
Solutions
By Tax or Document Type
By Industry
By Team or Initiative
By Region