E-factoring for Small and Midsize Companies Finally Arrives in Argentina

Francisco de la Colina
April 15, 2019

With the issuance of Resolution 5/2019 by the Ministry of Labour and Production, Argentina has implemented the electronic credit invoice, a credit instrument intended to speed up payments and finance of small and midsize companies.

The electronic credit invoice is an invoice that the supplier issues to the buyer. The supplier will then also fiscally register the invoice so it can be negotiated publicly.

This is not the first time Argentina has intended to implement electronic credit invoices. In 2001, the country tried to implement the financial tool but was caught by the worst economic crisis in its history. Implementing electronic credit invoices became viewed as a burden for taxpayers instead of a resource and was ultimately discontinued.

When is it mandatory and who is affected?

In general terms, the framework is applicable to small and midsize companies in the context of their sale of supplies to big companies. However, midsize and small companies who wish to operate with electronic credit notes when transacting with a similar counterparty can voluntarily do so.

The Resolution 5/2019 is not yet applicable to all small and midsize companies but rather establishes a schedule for entry into force and will become mandatory in stages:

  • From March 12 until April 30: The electronic credit invoice becomes mandatory for small and midsize companies that supply automotive parts to large companies within the automotive sector provided that the invoice amount exceeds 9 million pesos (equivalent to $200K).
  • From May 1: Manufacturers; retailers; oil & gas distributors; electricity, water, and air conditioning services; finance intermediaries; insurance services; etc., will be required to comply.
  • From June 1: The mining sector will be required to comply.
  • From July 1: Construction and transport sector will be required to comply.
  • From August 1: Real estate services, educational services, healthcare services, artistic and cultural services, sport or entertainment, and the agricultural sector will be required to comply.
  • From September 1: Gastronomical sector, hotel industry, professionals, scientists and technicians, administrative activities, support services, communication and information services will be required to comply.
  • From October 1: Retail points of sale such as supermarkets, kiosks, etc., will be required to comply.

What is affected?

The Resolution affects all type of documents issued by subjects of the mandate, including invoices and credit and debit notes of type A, B, and C. It is important to note that the mandate will be applicable only to invoices with an amount equal or superior to 50,000 pesos (equivalent to $1100) during the first year.

How does it work?

Invoices that fall under the framework must be issued as is any other document in Argentina. In other words, the invoice must be cleared by the tax authority before it is communicated to the buyer. However, the new framework means the possibility of extra steps to benefit from the financial opportunity.

Similar to what happens in Chile, in the Argentinean framework the invoice will be registered in an Electronic Credit Invoice Registry that serves the purpose of a hub of information for all the parties involved in the finance transaction. It is used by suppliers to consult which companies must receive such type of invoices and manifest their intentions to include the invoice in the framework. Such manifestations mean that the invoice will be passed on to another participant of the framework: an agent able to negotiate the invoice at the stock exchange market. Such agents can consult the status of the invoice in the registry.

At this point, and before the invoice is sent to an agent, the invoice must gain certain level of certainty.  In addition to the invoice communication done by the supplier, the invoice is communicated to the buyer by the tax authority’s own system (to the buyer’s tax inbox) so that the buyer can accept or reject the invoice. The law considers the invoice as accepted by the buyer when the invoice has been actively accepted, not rejected by the buyer, nor cancelled by the supplier.

The process means that big companies must put in place controls to be able to confirm invoices from both the commercial and tax perspectives as such invoices will not only affect them but will also be negotiated publicly. In fact, in case of lack of payment, the new owner of the invoice can pursue an expedited credit collection procedure against the buyer.

Does this effectively benefit the small and midsize businesses?

The answer is rather simple. Considering that around 30 percent of the small and midsize businesses in Argentina supply big corporations that have a minimum payment period of 90 days (usually non-negotiable), the utility of the electronic credit invoices becomes self-explanatory.  However, it is yet to be seen how productive the process really is, as the value of the invoice depends on its appreciation by the public market, which can potentially influence small and midsize businesses to collect payment earlier but at a smaller amount. In a country where the monthly inflationary rate can reach as high as 6.5 percent, the difference between collecting now or in 90 days can be substantial, and it is therefore likely that the tool will have widespread adoption.

Take Action

To keep up to date with regulatory, news and other updates join our LinkedIn Group or discover Sovos e-invoicing solutions.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Francisco de la Colina

Francisco de la Colina is a lawyer working on the regulatory team at Sovos TrustWeaver.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]