E-Delivery Note Usage Scenarios

Tamer Taşdelen
June 25, 2020

The General Communiqué no. 509 (communiqué) established the date of transition to the e-delivery note application and the full scope of the mandate. Whilst the communiqué addressed the general use of the application and the basic practices, it didn’t contain all the information businesses require and although the FAQ and information from the Turkish Revenue Administration (TRA) were useful, a guide was necessary.

In February 2020, the TRA released the e-Delivery Application Guideline (guideline) detailing the basic principles. It also answered the questions that companies and integrators had been asking.

Whilst the guideline provided much needed clarity, there are still some confusing scenarios as the deadline of July 2020 approaches.

Among these scenarios is the structure of delivery notes for goods that are not subject to sale and the chain delivery issue.

E-delivery notes issued for goods not subject to sale

One critical concern is that the TRA has included the scenario of delivery notes issued for goods not subject to sale and stated that e-delivery notes must also be issued for these transactions. However, these delivery notes should include additional details in the note section.

To illustrate, let’s say there are goods, equipment, to be shipped for repair/maintenance purposes. An e-delivery note must be issued for these goods with an explanation stated on the document, such as “to be repaired”, “to be painted”, “to change parts” etc.

Similarly, in outsourcing, a sample and consignment processes e-delivery note must be issued.

The chain delivery scenario

Another scenario in the guideline is chain delivery which was illustrated as follows.

Wholesaler “Y” who receives goods from manufacturer “X” may sell the goods directly to the dealer “Z” without actually receiving them. And dealer “Z” may sell the goods that are not yet delivered directly to customer “T”. In this scenario, the goods that are still in the warehouse of manufacturer “X” may be shipped directly to customer “T” by manufacturer “X”.

The schematron file answers the question, “To whom will the e-delivery note be issued in this scenario?” E-delivery notes should be sent directly to the recipient of the goods. So based on our example, the e-delivery note must include the information of customer “T”.

There are control options regarding this issue in the schematron. So, to understand whether the e-delivery note will be sent to a virtual or actual taxpayer, the tax ID/ID number of customer “T” should be checked.

Take Action

Sovos has more than a decade of experience keeping clients up to date with e-invoicing mandates all over the world.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Tamer Taşdelen

Tamer, 6 years of expertise in SAP, total 8 years of experience in software, has received a Bachelor’s Degree in Instructional Technologies and holds a MIS Master’s degree. Tamer has gained expertise in application development, project management, integration and system architecture. He uses his expertise in Sovos to guide its business partners and customers in technical and legal terms, to optimize business processes, to support Urge – marketing and customer compliance. Tamer also supports e-transformation in every platform as a speaker in Webinars and events.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]