Data Accuracy for Insurers – The Cost of Getting it Wrong

Joshua Momodu
December 1, 2020

This blog was last updated on January 11, 2024

With tax calculations being mainly data-driven in the insurance industry, it’s imperative that data provided is complete and accurate. Yet gaps in datasets and missing information still happen from time to time presenting a challenge for insurance companies. These gaps can cause a delay in filings which in turn, can lead to penalties and interest imposed by tax authorities. In addition to this, inaccurate premium amounts may be seen, in worst case, as tax evasion which can have dire consequences for all organizations involved.

Back to the source

Inaccurate data can stem from various sources including human error, lack of an appropriate data collection tool, inadequate data management processes etc. Having the wrong data can have an adverse effect on insurers in so many ways – inaccurate pricing which can lead to loss of business opportunities, damaging to brand reputation, under-delivery on customer expectations, and fraud claims. Insurers seeking to price risks correctly, to improve customer loyalty and satisfaction and check fraudulent claims must ensure every effort is made to improve data accuracy.

As legislation in different countries changes frequently, there is the requirement for additional information from the various tax authorities. In Spain, for instance, Consorcio surcharges cannot be settled without mandatory information like tax point (inception, cash received dates), insured addresses, insured amounts (for extraordinary risks) for example. Portugal is no different with the broker’s commission, and insured tax identification required as crucial information. For Italy, data completeness is needed to keep the insurance premium tax (IPT) books up-to-date.

These are just a few examples of the importance of having complete data for IPT calculation purposes. However, across various territories in Europe, the following key information should be provided to ensure accurate tax calculations and timely settlement of liabilities.

  • Tax points (invoice date, inception date, cash received date, maturity date etc)
  • Class of business (PDBI, liability, goods in transit)
  • Invoice currency
  • Taxable basis / premium (gross premium, net premium)
  • Premium tax calculated (insurer and insured taxes)

It’s worth noting that, when negative premiums are involved, it’s important to provide a detailed explanation on the reason for the negatives – correction of errors, cancellations, mid-term adjustments – to mention just a few. Failure to provide this can lead to a rejection of the negatives by tax authorities.

Improving data quality

With corrections and refunds being questioned now more than ever, it’s crucial that insurers take steps to improve data quality by identifying and understanding which data is mandatory for tax calculations. Some ways this can be achieved include:

    • Automating data collection, verification, and cleaning processes to reduce the risk of human error. In addition to this, cleaning data periodically ensures the effectiveness of IPT review and calculation processes
    • Reviewing data management processes to ensure the data obtained from customers meet tax authorities’ requirements
    • Regularly validating customer information to provide more accurate and up-to-date information

Issues with inaccurate data must be reduced to a negligible minimum for insurers to gain more meaningful actionable insights. Good quality data also means improved customer interactions, easier implementation of the data and improved productivity. Ad-hoc attempts to remove inaccurate data are of little value today because the volume of data and the pace at which it needs to be accessed and analysed are dramatically and frequently changing. Lastly, robust communication procedures and tools should be prioritised across organisations to get it right from the beginning of the insurance underwriting process to the tax filing to local authorities.

Take Action

Find out how Sovos helps insurers reduce risk with the first complete solution for IPT

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Joshua Momodu

Compliance Services Representative, IPT Compliance Services. Josh joined Sovos in May 2018 following completion of an Engineering postgraduate degree from Imperial College London. Working with the Captives team based in the UK, Josh is responsible for handling day to day delivery of IPT compliance services for captive insurers. He is currently completing a Financial Analyst certification.
Share this post

dtc spirits new york
North America ShipCompliant
February 14, 2025
A New Era for DtC Spirits Shipping: How New York’s Market is Taking Shape

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 In the fall of 2024, New York became the latest state to open its doors to direct-to-consumer (DtC) spirits shipping, marking a significant milestone for the industry. As one of the most populous states with a thriving market for craft and high-end spirits, the shift was […]

North America Unclaimed Property
February 10, 2025
Delaware Announces 2025 VDA Invitation Dates

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 Mark your calendars – April 11, 2025 and August 15, 2025 are this year’s anticipated release dates for the Delaware’s Secretary of State (SOS) VDA program invitations. In the event that an organization receives an invitation to participate in the Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (VDA) program  , […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 6, 2025
The Tariff and Sales Tax Mishmash – Untying the Mess

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 Talk of tariffs dominates the current news cycle with some commentators suggesting that tariffs will spell disaster for our economy while others say the exact opposite. We’ve seen the stock market sometimes fluctuate as tariffs are announced but later suspended, leaving us to wonder whether an […]

retailer dtc wine shipping
North America ShipCompliant
February 6, 2025
Retailer DtC Wine Shipping: The Time Has Come

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers We are often reminded by the media and those in the wine industry—as well as by wine enthusiasts—that the three-tier system of alcohol distribution in most states hinders consumer access to the expansive number of wines […]

Montana 1099-DA
North America Tax Information Reporting
February 5, 2025
State Filing Alert: Montana’s New 1099-DA Requirements for Crypto Brokers

This blog was last updated on February 5, 2025 Reporting digital asset transactions on Form 1099-DA just got a little more complicated. For 2025 transactions, crypto brokers that file Form 1099-DA with the IRS will be required to file the 1099-DA with the State of Montana. This makes Montana the first state to introduce a […]