Recent Indirect Tax Changes in the Crimean Peninsula

Timur Feinstein
June 13, 2014

This blog was last updated on June 27, 2021

While most of us have been watching with close interest the events that have been unfolding in the Ukraine over the past few months, Taxware has been paying particularly close attention to the potential indirect tax ramifications of the shifting political landscape. The changes for taxpayers located in the region of Crimea and in the city of Sevastopol have been quite dramatic. When the region of Crimea and city of Sevastopol were firmly part of Ukraine, the standard Ukrainian VAT rate of 20% applied there. In March of 2014, the Russian Federation formally and physically annexed the Crimean region and the city of Sevastopol. While this annexation has not been recognized by Ukraine or the international community in general, the Russian Federation has already begun to enact laws governing the application of indirect tax in these areas. According to Russian Federation Law of March 21, 2014, № 6-ФКЗ, “On Accepting the Republic of Crimea and the City of Federal Importance Sevastopol into the Russian Federation,” Article 15, the Law of the Russian Federation on Taxes and Collections will apply in Crimea and Sevastopol effective as of January 1, 2015. Until that time, the taxes are regulated by the decrees and acts of the Crimean Republic and the City Sevastopol. ukraineOn April 30, 2014, the State Council of the Crimean Republic issued Decree No. 2093-6/14. Under the Decree, for the time period subsequent to the annexation but before May 1, 2014, a standard ‘Crimean” VAT rate of 20% applied. However, effective May 1, 2014 and extending until January 1, 2015, the standard VAT rate in Crimea became 4%. A reduced rate of 2% applies for certain items including groceries, goods for children, periodicals, and medical goods. During this period, Crimean taxpayers are not entitled to credit input VAT paid on purchases and imports. This provision effectively converts the VAT in Crimea into a turnover/sales tax with a particularly low rate, but only for the transitional period. In addition, the Deputies of the State Council forgave all unpaid VAT-related liabilities and debts owed by taxpayers as of March 1, 2014, recognizing them as non-recoverable. In other words, Crimea is not recognizing any VAT liability that may have been owed but not paid to the Ukrainian government. Conversely, it appears that if Ukraine owed a taxpayer any money (e.g. input credits) not refunded as of April 1, 2014, taxpayers should not expect that money any time soon, at least not from the Crimean government. Unlike the Crimean Republic, the City Lawyerof Sevastopol has not enacted the low rates of 4% and 2%. Instead, effective May 1, 2014, a standard VAT rate of 18% applies in Sevastopol, and a reduced rate of 10% applies for certain items including groceries, goods for children, periodicals, and medical goods. Please refer to the Law of City of Sevastopol of April 18, 2014, № 2-ЗС (as amended by Law of May 29, 2014, № 13 –ЗС). One can locate the relevant documents on the website of Sevastopol City Legislative Body. In absence of additional legal or political developments, on January 1, 2015, the VAT rates in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol will harmonize with each other and with the 18% standard VAT rate and 10% reduced VAT rate that currently apply in the Russian Federation. In Ukraine, which recently elected Petro Poroshenko as its President, a planned reduction of the standard VAT rate from 20% to 17% that was to take effect on January 1, 2015 has been repealed. However, these changes will have no direct impact on Crimean and Sevastopol taxpayers, who will quite likely be paying VAT at the rate of 18% to the Russian Government.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Timur Feinstein

Timur is the Director – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos. Timur uses his eleven-plus years of experience to lead a team of tax professionals focusing on VAT determination and reporting. An attorney by trade, Timur is a member of both the Massachusetts and New York Bars. He holds a B.S. in Finance from Bentley University and a J.D. from Boston University School of Law. Timur is fluent in Russian.
Share this post

North America Unclaimed Property
February 10, 2025
Delaware Announces 2025 VDA Invitation Dates

This blog was last updated on February 10, 2025 Mark your calendars – April 11, 2025 and August 15, 2025 are this year’s anticipated release dates for the Delaware’s Secretary of State (SOS) VDA program invitations. In the event that an organization receives an invitation to participate in the Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (VDA) program  , […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 6, 2025
The Tariff and Sales Tax Mishmash – Untying the Mess

This blog was last updated on February 12, 2025 Talk of tariffs dominates the current news cycle with some commentators suggesting that tariffs will spell disaster for our economy while others say the exact opposite. We’ve seen the stock market sometimes fluctuate as tariffs are announced but later suspended, leaving us to wonder whether an […]

retailer dtc wine shipping
North America ShipCompliant
February 6, 2025
Retailer DtC Wine Shipping: The Time Has Come

This blog was last updated on February 6, 2025 By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers We are often reminded by the media and those in the wine industry—as well as by wine enthusiasts—that the three-tier system of alcohol distribution in most states hinders consumer access to the expansive number of wines […]

Montana 1099-DA
North America Tax Information Reporting
February 5, 2025
State Filing Alert: Montana’s New 1099-DA Requirements for Crypto Brokers

This blog was last updated on February 5, 2025 Reporting digital asset transactions on Form 1099-DA just got a little more complicated. For 2025 transactions, crypto brokers that file Form 1099-DA with the IRS will be required to file the 1099-DA with the State of Montana. This makes Montana the first state to introduce a […]

North America ShipCompliant
January 23, 2025
DtC Wine Shipping in 2024: A Year-in-Review

This blog was last updated on January 28, 2025 The direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shipping channel faced a storm of challenges in 2024, navigating some of the toughest market conditions in over a decade. As inflation tightened wallets and consumer behaviors shifted, the industry recorded its steepest declines in shipment volume and value since the inception […]