IRS Guidance on Abandoned Money Demonstrates Complexity of 1099 Reporting

Clark Sells
June 8, 2018

This blog was last updated on March 11, 2019

Long-awaited recent guidance from the IRS on abandoned property illustrated why 1099 reporting can be so complicated.

Simply put, there are gaps in reporting regulations that sometimes go unfilled—and then produce surprises when the IRS does fill them. One of those gaps involved abandoned property on deferred income products—essentially, pensions, annuities or insurance policies people leave behind when they die without having named a benefactor.

Long-standing confusion about escheatment

For years, in all 50 states, institutions would escheat abandoned money to the state, which would become custodian of the funds until a relative or other party close to the deceased could claim them. However, in turning money over to the state, institutions were actually making a federally taxable distribution.

Normally, that type of distribution would require reporting on form 1099-R and trigger 10 percent withholding. However, since the IRS had never specified whether escheatment of abandoned money was indeed a taxable event, many institutions didn’t know whether or not to report such transactions. Some did; others didn’t—and some probably didn’t have a standard process.

Clarity from the IRS but panic for some institutions

The IRS recently ruled that escheatment of abandoned funds is a taxable event, does require form 1099-R and does trigger 10 percent withholding. The policy will be in place for all such payments by Jan. 1, 2019, at the latest.

While the IRS brought clarity to the process, it is likely to have caused problems for institutions that had vague policies on how to report or withhold on escheatment or lacked policies altogether.

Now, any institution that didn’t report escheatment of abandoned funds on deferred income products will have to do so, along with withholding 10 percent of the money involved. That’s another 1099 process financial institutions have to implement in a sea of complex and ever-changing reporting regulations. It will end up being burdensome and costly for some companies.

Third parties that manage regulatory changes and automate 1099 reporting processes take the surprises out of 1099 reporting, enabling institutions to adapt to change quickly and easily.

Take Action

Sovos has been handling 1099 reporting for clients for more than three decades. Find out how Sovos can safeguard your business from the complexities of 1099 reporting, or contact Sovos for more information.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Clark Sells

Share this post

CATNAT Regime
North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
April 29, 2025
CATNAT Regime: Treatment of Natural Catastrophe Insurance in France

This blog was last updated on April 29, 2025 As some countries either introduce or consider introducing mandatory natural catastrophe insurance (e.g., Italy this year), France is ahead of the curve. This is because France already has a specific compensation scheme in place for coverage of property against natural disasters, and has had one since […]

Hungary tax penalty
EMEA North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
April 15, 2025
Hungary: Tax Penalty Regime

This blog was last updated on April 15, 2025 Hungary’s tax penalty consequences of non-compliance with tax requirements are governed by the Act on Rules of Taxation. The law outlines a range of sanctions for non-compliance, including tax penalties, default penalties, late payment interest and self-revision fees. This blog will provide an overview of each […]