Economic Nexus: Enforcement is Coming

Charles Maniace
December 4, 2019

We are now more than 16 months removed from the groundbreaking Supreme Court decision of South Dakota v. Wayfair. This decision unlocked the ability for U.S. states to impose a sales tax collection and remittance responsibility on remote sellers based solely on their economic connection to that state. Within that time, virtually every state imposing a sales tax (except Missouri and Florida) have enacted remote collection requirements. In most of those states (except Louisiana) those requirements are legally in effect, meaning the requirements are fully enforceable against remote sellers. In fact, in a number of places, remote collection rules have been on the books for more than a year. 

To date, many states have been focused on creating the necessary framework to facilitate compliance. For example, the state of Colorado has spent considerable energy explaining its rules to any taxpayer willing to listen. Likewise, Texas, whose requirements came into effect last October, has crafted simplified requirements for remote sellers. States have yet to wrap their brains around the idea that standard audit practices cannot be effective in a world where they must enforce rules against hundreds of thousands of additional taxpayers, but it’s only a matter of time before we see a concerted attempt at enforcement.

California’s approach to enforcing sales tax nexus

Over the last few weeks, it’s been widely reported that the state of California has sent some eye-popping assessments to taxpayers. Back in the old days, sales tax nexus was based on physical presence, loosely translated as having people or property in a jurisdiction. Even under the old rules, businesses that utilized third-party facilitator services that stored the seller’s inventory in fulfillment centers throughout the country, had a tax collection responsibility in whatever states those fulfillment centers were located. Since the seller held title to their own inventory sitting in the facilitator’s warehouse, they held property in the jurisdiction. While it may have taken California some time, it appears the state is now aggressively enforcing tax collection requirements under those historical rules, and since states can go back as far as their statute of limitations may allow, the audit risk for non-compliant taxpayers is substantial.

In Wayfair, the Supreme Court held the physical presence requirement was “unsound and incorrect” from the day it was announced, but they also signaled that states would be unwise to attempt a retroactive enforcement of economic nexus. At the time, the only state seriously contemplating retroactive enforcement, Hawaii, quickly changed its mind and informed taxpayers that remote sellers falling within their threshold would be required to collect from July 1, 2018 onward.

What remote sellers can expect from increased enforcement

The recent experience of California taxpayers is informative to understand what might be next for pure remote sellers that have yet to adopt solutions to manage their vastly expanded collection and remittance requirements. 

  • If you continue to take a “wait and see” approach…
  • If you have been sitting on the sidelines hoping the U.S. Congress will step in and put a halt to remote collection…
  • If you have been thinking that states won’t adopt processes that will enable enforcement against far flung taxpayers…

…the time may be right to reconsider your strategy.

While most states will likely respect the Court’s admonition against retroactive enforcement, there is nothing retroactive about enforcing a rule back to its effective date. Meaning if a state enacted an economic nexus requirement concurrent or subsequent to the Wayfair decision in June 2018, those rules are ripe for enforcement and companies can be assessed back to the date those rules became effective. The clock is ticking, and the longer you wait to become compliant, the bigger the backlog of untaxed transactions becomes, increasing your audit exposure along the way. Non-compliance is a risky business and getting riskier by the day.

Take Action

 See the S.D v. Wayfair Economic Nexus Table for details on each state’s effective and pending remote sales tax collection legislation.  

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Charles Maniace

Chuck is Vice President –Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, he leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals that provide the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 20-year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC, Bloomberg and more. Chuck has also been named to the Accounting Today list of Top 100 Most Influential People four times.
Share this post

North America Tax Information Reporting
September 21, 2023
Sovos Education Returns to Orlando with Statutory Accounting CPE

If you didn’t join us in D.C. or San Francisco earlier this year, you won’t want to miss one last opportunity in 2023 to take part in live continuing education. Sovos Education is returning to the Orlando area for a full week of statutory accounting CPE opportunities and we’re hoping to see you there. Sun […]

North America ShipCompliant
September 20, 2023
Prevent Consumer Confusion Around Hard Versions of Soft Drinks

A trend of the last few years has been the surge in new products entering the beverage alcohol market, from hard seltzers to RTD cocktails, along with the entry of well-established, traditionally non-alcoholic brands, like Hard Mountain Dew and Simply Spiked. While the growth of hard soft drinks is great for consumers, who benefit from […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
September 19, 2023
Form 1042 (and 945) Returns Electronic Filing Requirement Updates

We’ve previously discussed how the IRS released final electronic filing requirements for information returns effective with 2023 returns. One of those key changes is that businesses can no longer submit Form 1042 withholding tax returns on paper starting with tax year 2023 filings and beyond. But how will that actually impact businesses for the upcoming […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 18, 2023
Intrastat Thresholds: Current Exemption Values

Intrastat thresholds are value thresholds which decide if companies in an EU Member State qualify to file a return to tax authorities, based on their intra-community trading. These thresholds change annually, prompting businesses to conduct an annual recalculation to know their obligations. This blog contains all the Intrastat reporting thresholds for 2023, as well as […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 18, 2023
Intrastat Guide: Reporting, Numbers, Thresholds

Intrastat is an obligation created in 1993 that applies to certain businesses that trade internationally in the European Union. Specifically, it relates to the movement of goods – arrivals and dispatches – across EU Member States. The requirements of Intrastat remain similar across the EU, though certain Member States have implemented rules differently. As a […]