Oregon, Iowa Litigation Signals Interest in More Self-Distribution

Alex Koral
August 31, 2023

This blog was last updated on August 31, 2023

While the wave of litigation to remove legal barriers to retailer direct-to-consumer (DtC) keeps crashing against the breakwaters of district courts, a recent ripple in the courts may signal a potential shift in rules around self-distribution, which could have deep effects on the industry in the years to come.

First, the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission (OLCC) settled a suit brought by a Washington brewery that asserted that the state’s beer self-distribution and DtC shipping laws were improperly discriminatory against out-of-state brewers. Rather than argue the case in front of a judge, the OLCC decided to extend the ability to self-distribute beer to Oregon retailers and to DtC ship beer to Oregon residents to all beer producers across the country. Breweries will need to get licensed and approved by the OLCC before they can affect these sales, but the prior restrictions on who could receive those licenses are now gone.

In a neat follow up, an Oregon winery filed suit against Iowa in July alleging that Iowa’s wine self-distribution laws are also unconstitutionally discriminatory. Iowa currently allows holders of a Class A wine manufacturer license to self-distribute their wines to Iowa retail shops. However, Class A licenses may only be issued to applicants of “good moral character,” which, as defined by Iowa law, is a condition that may only be achieved by being an Iowa resident (Iowa Code, Chapter 123.3(40)). The Oregon winery objects to this limitation (as might many of us), though it remains to be seen if the court will agree.

While it is quite early to predict how the Iowa case will progress, these two cases present an enticing rise of interest in self-distribution and expanding its availability to more out-of-state suppliers.

Why do we care about self-distribution?

Self-distribution is an important but rather underdiscussed method of selling alcoholic beverages that could provide meaningful benefit for small and growing producers and their consumers alike.

In the three-tier system, which is how most beverage alcohol is distributed and sold across the country, there is a strict hierarchy of how products get to market: suppliers (producers and importers) may sell only to distributors, who then sell to retailers, which is where consumers can make their purchases. Distributors thus hold a privileged position in the industry as they are effectively a legally mandated intermediary, without which alcohol could not be sold in most situations.

Often enough, this is no trouble as alcohol distributors’ value can go beyond fulfilling a statutory requirement. They handle logistics and transportation and provide local contacts to help sell products. They understand the rules in their state and can help guide their suppliers to avoid legal trouble. Indeed, many industries utilize wholesale services, and it stands to reason that even without the benefit of the law, most alcohol would still be sold through distributors. But that legal mandate, along with other legal protections they have acquired over the years, can lead to poor outcomes.

Smaller producers, in particular, can struggle under the three-tier system, as many distributors lack the time or capacity to fully support new or limited production brands. (Part of this is likely a consequence of the extreme consolidation in the distributor tier over the last few decades, as today’s massive distributors chase the higher profits that established brands bring.) It can be difficult to even attract the attention of a distributor, let alone ensure that they will give your brands their due attention and care. The result is that many craft manufacturers are either unable to get into retail shops or are stuck in unprofitable distribution relationships.

To help their craft producers, many states have adopted exceptions to their strict three-tier systems, granting suppliers some permission to sell directly to consumers (such as through tasting rooms or DtC shipping), and enabling them to sell directly to retailers—self-distribution. With few exceptions, however, self-distribution rights are granted only to local, in-state manufacturers.

The Oregon and Iowa cases directly attack this in-state only permission, identifying it as a policy that unfairly discriminates against out-of-state interests. If a state allows for self-distribution, it clearly must find it to be compatible with its three-tier system and not so inherently risky or deleterious to public safety that the state can’t establish rules and procedures to control it. As such, where in-state wineries, breweries and distilleries may self-distribute, the main reason to not extend that permission to similarly situated out-of-state suppliers is protectionism.

Oregon apparently agrees and it now grants all U.S. breweries access to its self-distribution market (those breweries of course will still need to abide by Oregon’s laws when self-distributing in the state, including any licensing or tax requirements the state imposes).

Since Oregon settled the case, rather than hash it out in court, there was no discussion of the legal merits or creation of any definitive precedence that courts in other states can look to, but it is hard to see why Iowa’s wine self-distribution law would not be discriminatory when the OLCC itself thought Oregon’s self-distribution law was. And if Iowa also opens up to wider self-distribution, then a wave could quickly expand self-distribution rights across the country.

Take Action

Looking to streamline your distribution compliance and management? Learn how Sovos ShipCompliant can help.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Koral

Alex Koral is Senior Regulatory Counsel for Sovos ShipCompliant in the company’s Boulder, Colorado office. He actively researches beverage alcohol regulations and market developments to inform development of Sovos’ ShipCompliant product and help educate the industry on compliance issues. Alex has been in the beverage alcohol arena since 2015, after receiving his J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School.
Share this post

dtc spirits new york
North America ShipCompliant
February 14, 2025
A New Era for DtC Spirits Shipping: How New York’s Market is Taking Shape

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 In the fall of 2024, New York became the latest state to open its doors to direct-to-consumer (DtC) spirits shipping, marking a significant milestone for the industry. As one of the most populous states with a thriving market for craft and high-end spirits, the shift was […]

North America Unclaimed Property
February 10, 2025
Delaware Announces 2025 VDA Invitation Dates

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 Mark your calendars – April 11, 2025 and August 15, 2025 are this year’s anticipated release dates for the Delaware’s Secretary of State (SOS) VDA program invitations. In the event that an organization receives an invitation to participate in the Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (VDA) program  , […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 6, 2025
The Tariff and Sales Tax Mishmash – Untying the Mess

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 Talk of tariffs dominates the current news cycle with some commentators suggesting that tariffs will spell disaster for our economy while others say the exact opposite. We’ve seen the stock market sometimes fluctuate as tariffs are announced but later suspended, leaving us to wonder whether an […]

retailer dtc wine shipping
North America ShipCompliant
February 6, 2025
Retailer DtC Wine Shipping: The Time Has Come

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers We are often reminded by the media and those in the wine industry—as well as by wine enthusiasts—that the three-tier system of alcohol distribution in most states hinders consumer access to the expansive number of wines […]

Montana 1099-DA
North America Tax Information Reporting
February 5, 2025
State Filing Alert: Montana’s New 1099-DA Requirements for Crypto Brokers

This blog was last updated on February 5, 2025 Reporting digital asset transactions on Form 1099-DA just got a little more complicated. For 2025 transactions, crypto brokers that file Form 1099-DA with the IRS will be required to file the 1099-DA with the State of Montana. This makes Montana the first state to introduce a […]