Japan and the Cross-Border Supply of Electronic Services

Robert Gallagher
October 2, 2015

Growing Trends in the Digital Economy: Japan and the Cross-Border Supply of Electronic Services

The Destination Principle

The fusion of globalization and digital commerce has sparked a trend in the world of indirect taxation. Effective October 1, 2015, Japan became the latest country to adopt the “Destination Principle” for the cross-border supply of electronic services, joining others such as the European Union and South Korea in this practice.

Under the “Destination Principle”, supplies of electronic commerce are subject to the applicable tax (VAT, Goods/Services Tax, or Consumption Tax) in the country in which the recipient of the supplies is located. In this manner, tax is levied at the place of final consumption, thereby creating harmony and competitive equality among foreign and domestic corporations.

October 1, 2015: Japanese Consumption Tax (JCT) Goes Into Effect

Beginning on October 1, 2015, a foreign business supplying electronic services to Japan must register to collect and remit Japanese Consumption Tax (JCT). For electronic services, Japan now considers the place of taxation to be “the place of domicile or residence of the person (or the place of head or principal office in the case of a corporation) who received the services.”

Under Japanese law, “electronic services” are defined as services that are “supplied via electronic and telecommunication networks, excluding those ancillary to other transactions (such as the notification of the results of other transactions)”. This definition includes the sale of electronic books, music, games, software, as well as online advertising, and even virtual language courses. Electronic services that are excluded include online banking, asset management, and basic electronic communication.

There is a small business threshold of 10 million JPY that must be exceeded before a business is required to collect and remit JCT. For example, a business with taxable sales not exceeding 10 million JPY in the base period for the taxable period is exempt from JCT obligation.

B2B vs. B2C JCT Taxation Schemes

In Japan, the taxation scheme for the cross border supply of electronic services distinguishes between business–to-consumer (“B2C”) transactions and business-to-business (“B2B”) transactions. For B2C transactions, a foreign business supplying electronic services to a Japanese customer is required to collect and remit JCT. For B2B transactions, however, a “Reverse Charge” will apply. Under this mechanism, the transaction is subject to JCT, but the foreign business is exempt from the obligation to pay JCT.

Instead, the Japanese business purchaser will self-assess and remit JCT to Japan’s National Tax Agency. To distinguish between B2B and B2C transactions, Japanese law defines B2B transactions as “services that are, among electronic services provided by foreign businesses, normally limited to businesses, in respect of the nature, terms, etc. of the services provided.”

Who Will Be Next to Change Taxation Rules?

The trend whereby national tax authorities amend the place of supply rules to accommodate the changes presented by the digital economy is showing no signs of slowing down. For instance:

  • Discussions to implement a VAT system and possibly similar place of supply rules in Egypt have been heating up in recent weeks.
  • New Zealand and Australia are widely expected to implement their own version of this taxation scheme sometime in 2016 and 2017, respectively.

As the digital economy continues to grow, there’s little doubt more nations will enact similar measures to capture valuable tax revenues from foreign business supplying electronic services domestically.

Sovos Compliance continues to closely monitor these changes as they progress through their respective national legislatures. Follow them with us!

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Robert Gallagher

Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]