To Increase or Not Increase: That's Japan’s Consumption Tax Question

Robert Gallagher
May 16, 2016

The Proposed Changes to Japan’s Consumption Tax

In Japan, consumption tax is paid by consumers when they purchase goods and services. Presently, Japan’s consumption tax rate is 8%. On March 29, 2016, the Japanese Diet (National Parliament) approved the Fiscal Year 2016 Budget, including various tax reforms. The reforms include an increase in the consumption tax standard rate from 8% to 10% and the introduction of a reduced rate of 8%, effective April 1, 2017.

The reduced rate of 8% will apply to the sale of food and beverages. “Food” will be defined under the Japanese Food Labelling Law. The provision of dining or restaurant services and the sale of alcoholic beverages are excluded, and will remain taxable at the standard rate.

Sales of newspapers under a subscription agreement are also eligible for the reduced rate of 8%. Only certain titles of newspapers which feature information on general society such as politics, economics, and culture, and are issued at least twice a week, are eligible. All other publications that do not meet these criteria will be subject to the standard rate of 10%.

Prior Rate Increases

A 3% consumption tax was introduced in Japan in 1989. The rate was increased to 5% in 1997 and to 8% in 2014. In 1997, the rate increase kicked a recovering economy back into recession. In the second quarter of 1997 alone, Japan’s national Gross Domestic Product shrank by 3.9%. In 2014, the rate increase resulted in a deep slump in consumer spending.

Should Japan Increase its Consumption Tax Rate?

Currently, there exists a great difference of opinion on whether Japan should continue its plan to increase the consumption tax standard rate from 8% to 10% in April 2017.

In late March 2016, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe reaffirmed his commitment to the rate increase, stating that he would press ahead unless there was a natural disaster or economic event on the scale of the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. In mid-April 2016, just weeks after Prime Minister Abe made this statement, a series of powerful earthquakes occurred in Japan. The Government plans to assess the damage in the coming weeks, but significant detrimental effects on industrial production and foreign tourism are expected. After a detailed assessment has been performed, Prime Minister Abe will decide if the latest earthquakes will lead to a delay in the tax increase.

Various international financial organizations have publically stated their support of an increase in Japan’s consumption tax rate. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) stated that Japan should proceed with the increase in order to secure funds for further economic stimulus and to convince other nations that it is committed to reducing its national debt. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recently suggested that Japan should raise the consumption tax rate all the way to 15% at some point in the future.

There are, however, notable opponents to the planned rate increase to Japan’s consumption tax. Nobel laureate economists Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz have publically stated their belief that Japan should delay the rate increase. Krugman, who met with Prime Minister Abe to discuss the issue, stated that fiscal policy should be used to reinforce monetary easing, and that Japan has not yet emerged from a deflationary period. Additionally, recent polls have estimated that 60% to 65% of Japanese citizens favor delaying the rate increase.

Should there be a delay when it comes to increasing Japan’s consumption tax? Stay with Sovos and sign up to our blog for more developments!

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Robert Gallagher

Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]