New Sales Tax Modernization Being Proposed in Massachusetts

Charles Maniace
February 24, 2020

When Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker issued his Fiscal Year 2021 budget proposal in late January, he proposed several ideas purporting to modernize Massachusetts sales tax by recognizing the growing importance of technology and computing power in tax compliance. The ideas are interesting to say the least.

Idea #1 – Shorter Time from Collection to Remittance

For many taxpayers in Massachusetts, sales tax filing and remittance happens on a monthly basis, meaning that on the 20th of the month, sellers will report and remit any tax collected in the previous month. As accurately described by Governor Baker, under this system tax may not be remitted until 50 days after a sale has occurred. The proposed change would require large sellers ($100,000 or more in sales tax remitted during the previous year) to file their taxes during the last week of the calendar month. That filing would include all taxes collected in the immediately previous 4 weeks. Tax collected in the last week of the month would be reported in the following month.

States have long used pre-payments or accelerated payments to achieve a similar objective, requiring states to effectively pay a “deposit” on projected future tax collections. Massachusetts does not currently have a pre-payment requirement in their law but believes that traditional monthly filing as exists today as an “antiquated process [that] was established decades ago during the time of manual cash registers, handwritten checks, and mechanical adding machines.” 

Idea #2 – Real Time Remittance

Beginning in 2023, retailers (through their Payment Processors) would be required to remit sales tax daily as sales are made. Real Time or Near Real Time tax remittance has been considered by Massachusetts in previous years and has also surfaced as an idea in other states as well, but to date no jurisdiction has a concrete requirement in place. We understand that a handful of companies claim to have the technology in place that would enable successful same day payments.

Allowing states to work directly with Payment Processors to enable efficient and timely tax collection has some initial appeal. In some ways, it looks a little like the Marketplace Facilitator requirements that are sweeping the country. But Marketplace Facilitators and Payment Processors are very different types of companies. Today, Payment Processors don’t necessarily know what their clients are selling, where the item is being delivered (it might not same address as what’s on file at the credit card company), and what portion (if any) of the total charge represents tax.  It’s also an open question as to whether states are properly equipped with the technology to receive payments in real time; which leaves open the question of whether the cost of enabling real-time payments will meet or exceed the expected financial benefit.

Idea #3 – Anti-Zapper Rules

For years, retailers with significant cash sales have found themselves vulnerable to tax zappers. A zapper is a piece of software that is downloaded to a POS system and makes some transactions “disappear” after the cash is taken but before the sale is recorded and the tax reported. Zappers have been around for years and the Governor’s proposal would impose civil penalties on the people and entities that sell or install zappers on POS terminals.

Concluding Thoughts

Governor Baker’s basic premise is unquestionably right. Tax is quickly going digital and states should recognize the impact modern technology has on tax – both with respect to how tax laws are enforced and how companies comply. Years ago, it would have been entirely unreasonable to ask a taxpayer to submit a tax return within a few short days of the transaction being consummated. In fact, it will still be a challenge for taxpayers without a comprehensive automated solution in place. Bigger questions surround real time payments and payment processor liability. The idea is novel but much needs to be learned before the requirements are set in stone.

First in Latin America and now in Europe and Asia, the concept of Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC’s) is gaining momentum. The theory behind this concept is that if governments have real-time (or near-real-time information) about what is being bought and sold in their country, they are well poised to ensure every penny of tax due is efficiently collected. Interestingly, while CTC’s focus on information, the Massachusetts proposal focuses on the timing of payments. It leaves wide open the question of efficient and accurate enforcement. Whether this approach takes hold in the Commonwealth of the rest of the United States remains to be seen. In any event, it strikes me that US state sales tax administrators, would do well to take a moment to understand what the rest of the world is doing so they can optimally prepare for the digitization of tax .

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Charles Maniace

Charles Maniace is Vice President – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a leading global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, Chuck leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals responsible for all the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 15 year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC and more.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 4, 2020
The On-premise Challenge Part III: The Business Case for Change

Should we move our tax engine to the cloud or keep it on-premise? This conversation is taking place in many organizations as they assess their approach to sales tax management. In this three-part series, we’ll explore some of the problems IT is working through to maintain on-premise solutions that may not always be visible to […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 4, 2020
Is There an Economic Nexus in New Hampshire?

When the Supreme Court decided on the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. case, it pushed almost every state to adopt or adjust economic nexus standards. However, the decision did not necessarily impact states without sales tax, such as New Hampshire. As such, there is currently no economic nexus in New Hampshire. Enforcement date: N/A Sales/transactions […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 4, 2020
What Changed in the Iowa Economic Nexus?

After the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, numerous states made adjustments to their economic nexus law. Iowa’s governor signed a state tax reform bill on May 30, 2018, which expanded on the definition of businesses that must collect Iowa sales tax and local option tax to include certain remote sellers. We have highlighted the […]

ShipCompliant United States
December 4, 2020
Sovos ShipCompliant Data Shows Record High Transactions on Black Friday and Cyber Monday

This year, Black Friday and Cyber Monday experienced the highest transaction and sales rates in their history. Black Friday saw an approximate 22% increase in sales, reaching $9 billion and Cyber Monday hit $10.8 billion in sales, up nearly 15% from last year, setting the record for the largest U.S. online shopping day ever. As […]

ShipCompliant United States
December 3, 2020
Illinois’ New Economic Nexus Sales Tax Rules to Affect Direct Wine Shippers

Starting January 1, 2021, many direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shippers will face an added sales tax burden on their shipments to Illinois. The Illinois Department of Revenue (DOR) published FY 2021-06, which explains the upcoming change. Under the recent “Leveling the Playing Field for Illinois Retail Act,” the state will require all remote sellers with economic […]