Louisiana Supreme Court Strikes Down Marketplace Facilitator Collection Requirement

Charles Maniace
February 5, 2020

In an interesting (but not earth shattering) development, on January 29, 2020 the Louisiana Supreme Court held that Jefferson Parrish could not hold Walmart.com liable to collect and remit sales tax on transactions made by third party sellers through their online platform. In short, Walmart.com is not a “dealer” as that term is defined under Louisiana law. While important with respect to evaluating the ability of states to pursue marketplaces retroactively (particularly in Louisiana), this case has very little impact on the current and future landscape of tax compliance in the post-Wayfair era.

Since the groundbreaking Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, virtually every state in the country has enacted rules or requirements compelling remote sellers to collect and remit tax based on an economic nexus standard. While some states enacted bills to enable remote collection, many did so via rules or regulations. While Kansas faced some backlash from their own Secretary of State regarding their rule, most others have imposed these new requirements without controversy. The key is that many states had existing statutes in place allowing the Department of Revenue to enforce their sales tax requirements to the “maximum extent” allowed under the law. When the Court in Wayfair changed the “maximum extent,” states were able to tweak their rules quickly.

Faced with the daunting reality of administering compliance for thousands of remote sellers, 38+ states enacted “Marketplace Facilitator” requirements. Marketplace Facilitator rules are a very different beast from economic nexus. In the case of economic nexus, states are casting a wider net, bringing more sellers under their jurisdiction than had been allowed before. Most of these sellers were required to charge sales tax in at least one state prior to Wayfair, and now are required to do so in more.

By contrast, until very recently, Marketplace Facilitators had no sales tax compliance responsibilities as it related to their marketplace clients. Granted, some marketplaces also sell directly and for those sales, tax collection was always fair game. But, it’s an entirely novel idea to make facilitators collect tax on a sale where they are merely bringing the buyer and seller together. This idea was likely not considered when states initially drafted their sales tax statutes and it seems reasonable for the Louisiana Supreme Court to require the legislature revisit their laws and clearly articulate such a requirement to eliminate any ambiguity or confusion.

While Wamart.com scored a victory here, its’ impact should not be overstated. This case involved transactions from a time well before the game-changing Wayfair decision and well before states began amending their laws to compel Marketplace Facilitator collection. The ruling does not suggest that Marketplace Facilitator laws are unconstitutional or overly burdensome. All it says is that you can’t enforce such a requirement in Louisiana until the necessary legislation is in place. Unlike economic nexus, the states (other than Louisiana) that have enacted Marketplace Facilitator rules have taken the preliminary step of enacting enabling legislation, a step Louisiana could take as well in their upcoming session.

So, if your strategy to manage Marketplace Facilitator requirements depended on state course cases like the one in Louisiana putting these requirements on ice, you should reconsider. While the Louisiana Supreme Court may have put a temporary speedbump down, you can be sure most others are accelerating down a path towards enforcement.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Charles Maniace

Charles Maniace is Vice President – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos. An attorney by trade, Chuck leads a team of attorneys responsible for all the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos clients continually compliant. Over his 14 year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has given talks and presentations on a variety of topics including The Taxation of High Tech Transactions, The Taxation of Remote Commerce, The Regulatory Implications of Brexit, The Rise of E-Audits, Form 1042-S Best Practices and Penalty Abatement Practices for Information Returns. Chuck is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and holds a B.S. in Business Economics from Bentley College, a J.D. from Boston University School of Law, and an LL.M in Taxation from Boston University School of Law.
Share This Post

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 13, 2020
Vietnam Makes E-Invoicing Mandatory

Whilst Vietnam has allowed the issue of electronic invoices since 2011, this has not proved popular with domestic businesses.  This is mainly due to the lack of an efficient framework for commercial processes and the technical capabilities required to issue e-invoices compliantly. During the last decade, the Vietnamese government has developed a more robust legal […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 13, 2020
Hungary Amends VAT Act – Real-Time Reporting Affects All

The Hungarian Ministry of Finance had a productive end to the decade. As outlined in an earlier article, the MoF announced a package of measures and proposals as part of its Economic Action Plan for 2020.  The aim of the plan is to improve VAT compliance and reduce fraud.  A bill to amend the laws […]

ShipCompliant United States
February 13, 2020
The Evolution of a More Competitive DtC Market

When I joined Wines & Vines magazine in 2011, I received an in-depth introduction to the world of direct-to-consumer wine shipments through the magazine’s collaboration with ShipCompliant. Back then the channel still seemed new, relatively novel, and while sales were strong in a few key markets, the overall growth of the segment was hobbled by […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 12, 2020
ECOFIN Speaks on EU VAT Reforms

Pivotal projects in the development of EU VAT The EU’s Economic and Financial Affairs Council (“ECOFIN”) issued a report in December. This followed its review of EU tax policies and developments since Finland took over Presidency of the Council of the European Union in July 2019.  In a previous article we summarised their status review […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA LATAM United States VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 12, 2020
What Is Value-Added Tax, Anyway? Trends Report Excerpt

Value-added tax (VAT) does not exist in the United States, but American companies are increasingly having to deal with VAT mandates in Latin America, Europe and Asia. Seeking to make up a massive gap in revenues, tax administrations are mandating strict policies to digitize VAT collection. American companies that fail to comply could see their […]