VAT Gap: EU Countries Lost €137bn in VAT Revenues in 2017

Jeroen Wensveen
October 30, 2019

In September, the European Commission released its latest study on the so-called ‘VAT Gap’. The VAT Gap is defined as the difference between the amount of VAT collected and the VAT Total Tax Liability (VTTL), in absolute or percentage terms. The VTTL is an estimated amount of VAT that is theoretically collectable based on VAT legislation and ancillary regulations. The VAT Gap measures the effectiveness of VAT enforcement and compliance measures in each EU country, as it provides an estimate of revenue lost due to fraud and evasion, tax avoidance, bankruptcies, financial insolvencies as well as miscalculations.

During 2017, the overall VAT Gap in the EU Member States fell from €145.4 bn in 2016 to €137.5 bn in 2017. In relative terms, the EU-wide gap dropped to 11.2%, down from 12.2% in 2016.

In 2017, the estimated VAT Gaps ranged from 0.6% in Cyprus, to 35.5% in Romania. Overall, the VAT Gap as a percentage of the VTTL decreased in 25 EU countries, with the largest improvements in Malta, Poland, and Cyprus and increased in three – Greece, Latvia, and marginally in Germany.

Source: European Commission – VAT Gap Full Report 2019

The substantial VAT Gap again highlights the need for comprehensive reform of the EU VAT rules, as proposed in 2017 by the Commission, and increased cooperation between EU Member States to clamp down on VAT fraud and to make the rules work for legitimate businesses and traders.

Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs, Pierre Moscovici said: “The favourable economic climate and some short-term policy solutions put in place by the EU helped to lower the VAT Gap in 2017. However, to achieve more meaningful progress we will need to see a thorough reform of the VAT system to make it more fraud-proof. Our proposals to introduce a definitive and business-friendly VAT system remain on the table. Member States cannot afford to stand by while billions are lost to illegal VAT carousel fraud and inconsistencies in the system.”

What is being done by the EU and its Member States to improve VAT collection?

Much progress has been achieved since the beginning of the Juncker Commission mandate to strengthen the ability of EU countries to administer and collect VAT:

  • New rules for the sale of e-services online came into force in 2015 allowing EU Member States to collect VAT where the consumer is based. The ‘One Stop Shop’ scheme allows traders to manage all their VAT obligations using one online portal.
  • In 2017 EU Member States also agreed to extend this new system to the sale of goods online, delivering another boost for VAT collection in the EU and helping authorities to recoup the current estimated €5 bn of VAT lost on online sales every year.

In 2018 the EU also agreed on a new framework to exchange more information and boost cooperation between national tax and law enforcement authorities. Once in force, EU countries will be able to exchange more relevant information and to cooperate more closely in the fight against criminal organisations, including terrorists.

In the meantime – inspired by developments in Latin America in the last decade – several EU countries have introduced their own measures to improve VAT collection, through digital transformation. They are introducing state-controlled, real-time IT platforms that place national tax administrations at the heart of business transactions. In 2017, Spain introduced the Immediate Information System (SII), a near real-time digital reporting obligation on sales and purchase transactions. Hungary followed in 2018 with a real-time reporting mandate on sales transactions and Poland has announced that in 2020 it will expand its monthly VAT transactional report (JPK_VAT) while at the same time abolishing the monthly VAT return. Greece looks set to introduce e-reporting by 2020 and France recently announced plans to introduce a mandatory B2B e-invoicing clearance system in 2023.

Now is the time to consider the global challenge that arises when many countries start to implement similar e-invoicing and e-reporting regimes. To stay compliant globally, companies should look for a tax compliance provider that allows them to maintain central automation processes, while having the flexibility to adapt to the wave of new tax digital mandates on the horizon from countries such as Greece and France. 

Take Action

To find out more about what we believe the future holds, download Trends: e-invoicing compliance and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Jeroen Wensveen

As Principal of Indirect Tax Solutions at Sovos, Jeroen is responsible for building out and managing the VAT line of products and solutions available on the Sovos Intelligent Compliance cloud platform. Jeroen is a tax lawyer with over 20 years of international VAT experience, beginning his career as a consultant for PwC before serving as VAT director for Rockwell Automation, a global leader in industrial automation. Jeroen also co-founded VAT Resource, a successful VAT services and technology company, that was acquired by Sovos in 2014. Jeroen holds a master’s degree in tax law from the University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
June 1, 2020
The Advantage of a Cloud-First Company

As Sovos continues to expand our technology and service offerings we will always prioritize operating in the cloud before any other means. Sovos’s SaaS and Security Strategy  Sovos at its core is a Software as a Service (SaaS) and cloud-first company. This means that as Sovos continues to expand our technology and service offerings we […]

ShipCompliant United States
May 28, 2020
Ask Alex: Your Bev Alc Compliance Questions Answered (May 2020)

Do you have questions about the rules, regulations, and compliance requirements of the beverage alcohol industry? This series, Ask Alex, is a perfect opportunity to get those pressing questions answered straight from one of the industry’s regulation and market experts, Alex Koral, Senior Regulation Counsel, Sovos ShipCompliant.  To take advantage of this opportunity and get […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
May 28, 2020
Turkey’s Transition Conditions for E-ledger

On October 19, 2019, the Turkish Revenue Administration (TRA) published a communique making the e-ledger application mandatory for e-invoice users, companies subject to an independent audit, and companies identified by the Presidency to have poor tax compliance.  The e-ledger application enables businesses to create the legally mandated general journals and ledgers and submit e-ledger summary […]

ShipCompliant United States
May 27, 2020
How Technology Partnerships Improve DtC Compliance

To be an expert, one has a specialty. Ours is beverage alcohol compliance. Since compliance sits at the heart of operations, being connected at every step helps our customers focus on their business instead spending countless hours on manual processes. Compliance is challenging, but we make it easier with a large and robust network of […]

EMEA IPT Tax Compliance
May 26, 2020
Why IPT Reporting is so Complex for Insurers

Accurately calculating insurance premium tax (IPT) for reporting can be complex.  And the ramifications of getting it wrong can be far reaching from impacting profit margins to unwelcome audits, fines and damage to your company’s reputation in the market and with customers. Calculation methods When I speak to customers about how they calculate insurance premium […]