VAT Gap: EU Countries Lost €137bn in VAT Revenues in 2017

Jeroen Wensveen
October 30, 2019

In September, the European Commission released its latest study on the so-called ‘VAT Gap’. The VAT Gap is defined as the difference between the amount of VAT collected and the VAT Total Tax Liability (VTTL), in absolute or percentage terms. The VTTL is an estimated amount of VAT that is theoretically collectable based on VAT legislation and ancillary regulations. The VAT Gap measures the effectiveness of VAT enforcement and compliance measures in each EU country, as it provides an estimate of revenue lost due to fraud and evasion, tax avoidance, bankruptcies, financial insolvencies as well as miscalculations.

During 2017, the overall VAT Gap in the EU Member States fell from €145.4 bn in 2016 to €137.5 bn in 2017. In relative terms, the EU-wide gap dropped to 11.2%, down from 12.2% in 2016.

In 2017, the estimated VAT Gaps ranged from 0.6% in Cyprus, to 35.5% in Romania. Overall, the VAT Gap as a percentage of the VTTL decreased in 25 EU countries, with the largest improvements in Malta, Poland, and Cyprus and increased in three – Greece, Latvia, and marginally in Germany.

Source: European Commission – VAT Gap Full Report 2019

The substantial VAT Gap again highlights the need for comprehensive reform of the EU VAT rules, as proposed in 2017 by the Commission, and increased cooperation between EU Member States to clamp down on VAT fraud and to make the rules work for legitimate businesses and traders.

Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs, Pierre Moscovici said: “The favourable economic climate and some short-term policy solutions put in place by the EU helped to lower the VAT Gap in 2017. However, to achieve more meaningful progress we will need to see a thorough reform of the VAT system to make it more fraud-proof. Our proposals to introduce a definitive and business-friendly VAT system remain on the table. Member States cannot afford to stand by while billions are lost to illegal VAT carousel fraud and inconsistencies in the system.”

What is being done by the EU and its Member States to improve VAT collection?

Much progress has been achieved since the beginning of the Juncker Commission mandate to strengthen the ability of EU countries to administer and collect VAT:

  • New rules for the sale of e-services online came into force in 2015 allowing EU Member States to collect VAT where the consumer is based. The ‘One Stop Shop’ scheme allows traders to manage all their VAT obligations using one online portal.
  • In 2017 EU Member States also agreed to extend this new system to the sale of goods online, delivering another boost for VAT collection in the EU and helping authorities to recoup the current estimated €5 bn of VAT lost on online sales every year.

In 2018 the EU also agreed on a new framework to exchange more information and boost cooperation between national tax and law enforcement authorities. Once in force, EU countries will be able to exchange more relevant information and to cooperate more closely in the fight against criminal organisations, including terrorists.

In the meantime – inspired by developments in Latin America in the last decade – several EU countries have introduced their own measures to improve VAT collection, through digital transformation. They are introducing state-controlled, real-time IT platforms that place national tax administrations at the heart of business transactions. In 2017, Spain introduced the Immediate Information System (SII), a near real-time digital reporting obligation on sales and purchase transactions. Hungary followed in 2018 with a real-time reporting mandate on sales transactions and Poland has announced that in 2020 it will expand its monthly VAT transactional report (JPK_VAT) while at the same time abolishing the monthly VAT return. Greece looks set to introduce e-reporting by 2020 and France recently announced plans to introduce a mandatory B2B e-invoicing clearance system in 2023.

Now is the time to consider the global challenge that arises when many countries start to implement similar e-invoicing and e-reporting regimes. To stay compliant globally, companies should look for a tax compliance provider that allows them to maintain central automation processes, while having the flexibility to adapt to the wave of new tax digital mandates on the horizon from countries such as Greece and France. 

Take Action

To find out more about what we believe the future holds, download Trends: e-invoicing compliance and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Jeroen Wensveen

As Principal of Indirect Tax Solutions at Sovos, Jeroen is responsible for building out and managing the VAT line of products and solutions available on the Sovos Intelligent Compliance cloud platform. Jeroen is a tax lawyer with over 20 years of international VAT experience, beginning his career as a consultant for PwC before serving as VAT director for Rockwell Automation, a global leader in industrial automation. Jeroen also co-founded VAT Resource, a successful VAT services and technology company, that was acquired by Sovos in 2014. Jeroen holds a master’s degree in tax law from the University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
Share This Post

Tax Compliance United States
November 14, 2019
The Top 5 Most Common Unclaimed Property Compliance Mistakes

Full compliance when it comes to unclaimed property requirements can be difficult to determine. For many businesses, it isn’t until they are audited and fined that they find out they made a mistake. Below are the most common mistakes businesses make when complying with unclaimed property requirements. 1. Reporting is mandatory Reporting unclaimed property is […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 13, 2019
Revisiting the EU VAT “2020 Quick Fixes”

Part 3:  Chain Transactions This is the third in a series of four blogs providing explanatory detail to the EU’s “2020 Quick Fixes” that aim to standardise certain VAT rules throughout the EU. Part one of this series focussed on VAT Identification of the Customer, whilst part two provided guidance on the Exemptions of Intra-Community […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
November 12, 2019
Will the myDATA Project be Delayed in Greece and Mandatory E-Invoicing be Introduced?

Two months after closing the public consultation on the myDATA scheme, the Greek tax authority, IAPR, has yet to share the feedback received from the industry on the proposed scheme or make any official announcement in this regard. However, local discussions indicate that, the IAPR may reintroduce its initial agenda proposed back in August 2018, […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
November 7, 2019
IRS Tax Gap Data Previews the Future of 10-series Reporting Requirements

A recent fact sheet released by the IRS shows the latest tax gap estimates and overall taxpayer compliance and demonstrates why the IRS is likely to strengthen its tax reporting enforcement policies. The findings are based on data from tax years 2011, 2012 and 2013. The purpose of this document is to let the public […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
November 7, 2019
Improving Sales Tax Automation in Manufacturing

Managing manufacturing sales tax is complex for a number of reasons. You may have thousands of SKUs with taxability rules that differ across states, as well as hundreds, if not thousands, of exemption certificates to track and keep up to date for your customers. Additionally, tracking your own inventory for materials used internally that are […]