Why the New Process for Cancelling E-Invoices in Mexico Matters

Gustavo Jimenez
November 14, 2018

The changes involved in the new process for cancelling electronic invoices in Mexico are not trivial. There are major ramifications for both accounts payable (AP) and accounts receivable (AR) operations.

The new mandate, which fixes a major gap in Mexico’s e-invoicing policy, is aimed at enabling the SAT, the Mexican tax authority, to recover money lost through unjustified or fraudulent cancellations. For companies doing business in Mexico, it ushers in a host of new functional requirements.

Bringing buyers into the Mexican e-invoicing process

Under the old system, companies could cancel e-invoices unilaterally, without notifying the other parties involved. As such, they could avoid paying some income taxes by hiding revenue. On the other side, meanwhile, customers that paid for the goods or services could not deduct the expense of value-added tax (VAT) paid as they normally would.

The new mandate brings buyers of goods and services directly into the cancellation process. Sellers must send a notification to their clients before cancelling an invoice. In turn, the client must accept or reject the cancellation either via the SAT portal or through an e-invoicing provider within 72 hours. If the client does not respond, the invoice is cancelled.

New risks for companies handling e-invoices in Mexico

For companies doing business in Mexico, the change in the cancellation process requires making sure that e-invoicing solutions are up to the task of compliance. On the AR side, companies need to be sure that they can submit cancelation requests, validate cancellation status and cancel e-invoices within the parameters of the new system. On the AP side, they need to be able to consult, and to approve or deny, cancellation requests.

For AP operations, the ability to approve or deny requests is especially important. This new wrinkle in e-invoicing policy is what enables them to deduct VAT expenses when appropriate, making the new process a potential cashflow issues for organizations. Mishandling cancellation approvals can lead directly to unnecessary costs. AP users need to be able to manage cancellations requests while avoiding the risk of manual error, fines and penalties, and disputes with business partners.

Failure to master e-invoicing cancellations could also leave AR departments exposed to fines and penalties that were less of a risk before the new mandate went into effect. The SAT has further inserted itself into business relationships between buyers and sellers, and companies need to be in compliance in order to keep those relationships, as well as their communication with the government, running smoothly.

Sovos SAP solutions for Mexican e-invoice cancellations

The eCancellations SAP Framework from Sovos enables companies to manage the new cancellation process in Mexico within their SAP environments, ensuring they are in compliance with the SAT. The framework, native to SAP, also enables companies to streamline AR and AP processes, saving time and money. With eCancellations, users can manage all of their cancellations on both sides of the ledger within SAP, maintaining SAP as the single source of truth for e-invoicing data.

Take Action

Discover more about the new mandate for cancelling e-invoices in Mexico in this comprehensive guide to the new process.

Author
Gustavo Jimenez
Gustavo is Sovos’ Product Marketing Manager for eInvoicing solutions.

Relevant Posts

New York Implements Economic Nexus by Resuscitating 1980’s Law

When New York first passed its law defining what constitutes a “vendor” subject to collecting sales tax in the 1980’s, the idea of online shopping sounded like science fiction. In retrospect, NY may have effectively enacted the first “economic nexus” law when they drafted their definition of “vendor” to include a person who regularly or […]

Read More
IRS Uses Unprecedented Methods to Enforce ACA Reporting Penalties

With recent enforcement measures, the IRS has offered definitive proof that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is still alive and that the agency plans to strictly enforce ACA reporting. Last spring, the agency issued Letter 226J to Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) that failed to cover 95 percent of employees. ALEs are companies with 50 or […]

Read More
Government Shutdown Will Not Move IRS 1099 Reporting Deadlines

UPDATE (Jan. 8): Reporting season is moving forward according to plan. The IRS has announced that it will process tax returns on schedule and without delays. While the agency will clarify its contingency plan in the coming days, organizations should proceed as planned with 1099 reporting and other seasonal filings. The IRS will recall a […]

Read More
4 Big Post-Wayfair State Sales Tax Developments to Watch 2019

The South Dakota v. Wayfair decision last June has created a lot of angst for indirect tax professionals and the businesses they work so hard to protect from the burdens of sales and use tax filing. Six months later as we begin the new year, that angst has not gotten any lighter. Any federal legislative […]

Read More
The 5 Biggest Stories in Indirect Tax Compliance 2018

2018 was a volatile year in indirect tax compliance for tax, finance and IT professionals worldwide. With an increase in globalization and tax gaps surpassing tens of billions in some countries, it’s not surprising that one of the biggest challenges governments are addressing is revenue collection. Like enterprises, governments are creating new, technology-driven processes to […]

Read More