Why the New Process for Cancelling E-Invoices in Mexico Matters

Gustavo Jimenez
November 14, 2018

The changes involved in the new process for cancelling electronic invoices in Mexico are not trivial. There are major ramifications for both accounts payable (AP) and accounts receivable (AR) operations.

The new mandate, which fixes a major gap in Mexico’s e-invoicing policy, is aimed at enabling the SAT, the Mexican tax authority, to recover money lost through unjustified or fraudulent cancellations. For companies doing business in Mexico, it ushers in a host of new functional requirements.

Bringing buyers into the Mexican e-invoicing process

Under the old system, companies could cancel e-invoices unilaterally, without notifying the other parties involved. As such, they could avoid paying some income taxes by hiding revenue. On the other side, meanwhile, customers that paid for the goods or services could not deduct the expense of value-added tax (VAT) paid as they normally would.

The new mandate brings buyers of goods and services directly into the cancellation process. Sellers must send a notification to their clients before cancelling an invoice. In turn, the client must accept or reject the cancellation either via the SAT portal or through an e-invoicing provider within 72 hours. If the client does not respond, the invoice is cancelled.

New risks for companies handling e-invoices in Mexico

For companies doing business in Mexico, the change in the cancellation process requires making sure that e-invoicing solutions are up to the task of compliance. On the AR side, companies need to be sure that they can submit cancelation requests, validate cancellation status and cancel e-invoices within the parameters of the new system. On the AP side, they need to be able to consult, and to approve or deny, cancellation requests.

For AP operations, the ability to approve or deny requests is especially important. This new wrinkle in e-invoicing policy is what enables them to deduct VAT expenses when appropriate, making the new process a potential cashflow issues for organizations. Mishandling cancellation approvals can lead directly to unnecessary costs. AP users need to be able to manage cancellations requests while avoiding the risk of manual error, fines and penalties, and disputes with business partners.

Failure to master e-invoicing cancellations could also leave AR departments exposed to fines and penalties that were less of a risk before the new mandate went into effect. The SAT has further inserted itself into business relationships between buyers and sellers, and companies need to be in compliance in order to keep those relationships, as well as their communication with the government, running smoothly.

Sovos SAP solutions for Mexican e-invoice cancellations

The eCancellations SAP Framework from Sovos enables companies to manage the new cancellation process in Mexico within their SAP environments, ensuring they are in compliance with the SAT. The framework, native to SAP, also enables companies to streamline AR and AP processes, saving time and money. With eCancellations, users can manage all of their cancellations on both sides of the ledger within SAP, maintaining SAP as the single source of truth for e-invoicing data.

Take Action

Discover more about the new mandate for cancelling e-invoices in Mexico in this comprehensive guide to the new process.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Gustavo Jimenez

Gustavo is Sovos’ Product Marketing Manager for eInvoicing solutions.
Share This Post

Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance LATAM
May 24, 2019
Colombia DIAN UBL 2.1 E-invoicing Mandate Reminds SAP Shops Why Compliance Matters

Colombia’s new electronic invoicing mandate serves as another reminder to SAP that compliance has to be at the heart of digital transformation efforts and migrations to SAP S/4HANA. The South American country, following the lead of Latin American neighbors Brazil and Mexico, is moving from a reporting e-invoicing model to a clearance model. Effectively, that means […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
May 24, 2019
TIGTA Audit Highlights Gaps in IRS Withholding Controls

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) reported results of a recent audit of the IRS internal controls in place to ensure that the withholding reported on information returns (i.e., Forms 1099) is accurately reflected on Form 945, Annual Return of Withheld Federal Income Tax, and that those amounts were paid to the IRS. […]

EMEA IPT
May 23, 2019
Key Reporting Considerations for Insurers Writing Insurance Across the EU

Freedom of services insurers are faced with a number of different obligations when entering new territories and writing insurance business within the European Union.  One that may initially be overlooked relates to which policy details are required to be recorded and then reported to the tax authorities.   It is essential that all insurance premium […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
May 23, 2019
Europe Embraces Digitized Invoices but Country Specific Requirements are Diverse

Based on the Billentis report of 2019 (The E-invoicing Journey 2019-2025), automated e-invoicing will generally result in cost savings of 60-80% compared to conventional paper format invoices. In this age of digital transformation, optimizing invoice flows is top of corporate agendas for most companies to improve efficiencies and reduce operating costs. And many companies want […]

Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance
May 22, 2019
Colombia anuncia el nuevo modelo de validación previa y el protocolo UBL 2.1 para su mandato de facturación electrónica

La autoridad fiscal de Colombia, DIAN (Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales), ha anunciado nuevos cambios a su mandato de facturación electrónica que serán implementados según la Resolución 020, orientada a las empresas que aún no han adoptado este modelo de facturación. Quienes ya son facturadores electrónicos deberán implementar el nuevo modelo antes del 2 […]