5 Considerations for Colombia’s eInvoicing Requirement

Brian Elswick
November 27, 2017

By January 2019, all companies that pay VAT in Colombia will be required to comply with mandatory e-invoicing as the country aims to curb tax evasion and increase collections. However, businesses with operations in Colombia must begin preparing now.

Here are 5 considerations that every company planning their VAT compliance strategies in Colombia should know:

  1. The DIAN can mandate compliance at any time prior to 2019.
    January 2019 is the official e-invoicing launch for all companies in Colombia. However, the DIAN, Colombia’s tax authority, can require select companies to implement e-invoicing under the current model prior to that date. Some companies are already required to comply, and the DIAN will select additional participants based on those it deems most at risk for evasion. Mandated companies will have 6 months to prepare before being required to go live.
  2. Companies must pass testing and production phases before beginning e-invoicing.
    Companies in Colombia must adequately prepare before beginning e-invoicing; it is not nearly as simple as turning on a switch to begin. Invoices, credit notes and debit notes must all pass through the testing and production environments, meaning companies must begin the process well before the date that they are mandated to start.
  3. Colombia is moving to a PAC e-invoicing model.
    In its current e-invoicing model, the DIAN is conducting all validations in batches. However, during the pilot program, it realized that a third-party validation model would be more efficient. As such, the DIAN will launch a synchronous approach with real-time validations, powered by certified, third-party providers like Sovos. This PAC model is similar to Mexico’s approach.
  4. Currently, only outbound processes are affected.
    Though Colombia’s original decree announcing the move to e-invoicing also paves the way for accounts payable and reporting processes, initially the requirement will impact accounts receivable processes. Invoices, credit notes and debit notes must all be submitted within the specified XML format. This phased approach is typical in Latin America, and Colombia will likely expand to outbound process soon after all companies are in compliance with the e-invoicing mandate. Companies should approach compliance in Colombia knowing that e-invoicing is just the beginning of the requirements.
  5. Specific e-invoicing requirements are similar elsewhere in Latin America.
    Colombia had several successful models to follow in determining its e-invoicing approach. Below are some of the primary requirements, which are similar to other programs in Latin America.

    • Consecutive number folios
    • Digital signature
    • Unique identification number (called a CUFE)
    • PDF representation with a QR code
    • Confirmation/cancellation from the receiver
    • Contingencies required
    • 5-year archiving

Companies in Colombia need to prepare now for the impending mandates – and the possibility that they will be required to comply before the 2019 launch date – not only to ensure compliance, but also to realize the benefits of e-invoicing.

“If electronic invoicing is mass-ified, there is a savings of 80% in the associated costs compared to the traditional paper invoice. Some people are scared by the initial investment in technology, but a study showed that it recovers in less than two years, because of low paper expenses, storage, internal processes, settlement of tax obligations and others,” said Pierina González Falla, director of supervision for the Dian.

Take Action

For more insights on Colombia’s e-invoicing mandate, including tips to prepare your SAP landscape, watch our on-demand webinar with SAPInsider.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Brian Elswick

Brian Elswick is the Marketing Programs Manager for Sales & Use Tax, Business-to-Government Reporting, and VAT.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 11, 2019
Why the IRS Needs to Release Cryptocurrency Tax Guidance

Despite IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig’s promise of “within the next 30 days” more than 30 days ago to Congress regarding the release of forthcoming cryptocurrency tax guidance, we have not seen anything materialize.  As we mentioned previously, the ongoing confusion related to tax reporting obligations continues to plague payers such as crypto or digital currency […]

EMEA Tax Compliance
July 10, 2019
New Regulation Reinforces Free Flow of Data in the EU

When thinking about the aim of GDPR, one of the first things that comes to mind is the set of rules, obligations, and restrictions on the processing of personal data. When in fact, as the full title of GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation – and its recitals explain, the subject matter and purpose of […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
July 10, 2019
Greek E-Invoicing Reform: Potential Impact of Recent National Elections

On 7 July, Greece began voting to elect a new government.  The disposed governing left party has been dealt with a hefty blow having been in power since 2015.  It was hoped they would introduce less severe politics which many claim they have not only failed to do but, in fact, they actually introduced stricter […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 9, 2019
The IRS Is Allowing TIN Masking on Form W-2. Here’s Why It’s a Good Idea

At last, the IRS is allowing payers to truncate, or effectively mask, tax identification numbers (TINs) on Forms W-2 sent to payees. The decision comes after years of concern from companies and taxpayers about the risk of exposing TINs, or Social Security Numbers in the case of individual payees, in W-2 distributions.  The new policy […]

EMEA IPT
July 9, 2019
Interpreting Insurance Tax Legislation

Tax legislation is sometimes structured, or worded, ambiguously.  This leaves scope for a number of different interpretations for the treatment of tax on insurance policies, some leading to a lower tax liability than others. This can often be seen when different insurance premium tax (IPT) rates apply to specific sub-classes of the same business or […]