Taxing Digital Products: Different Approach Across the Pond

Timur Feinstein
May 12, 2015

Applying the correct indirect tax on sales of downloaded or online products presents a considerable challenge for global companies. This article endeavors to offer a brief overview of the different approaches taken in the United States (“US”) and the European Union (“EU”) regarding the proper tax treatment of such items. Before we begin, when using the term “digital products,” we are talking about items downloaded or accessed via an electronic device rather than sold via a tangible format. Examples include downloaded or accessed software, digital books, music, videos, or database access.

Location of the Sale

When a company sells a digital product in the US, for sales and use tax, the sale will generally be sourced to the state of destination, i.e. the state where the customer receives or utilizes the digital product. For example, if a customer in Georgia downloads software from a Massachusetts provider, any possible sales and use tax is due in Georgia and not Massachusetts. If the state has local taxing jurisdictions, there are sometimes additional complexities associated with determining which local sales and use tax might be implicated, as this determination varies from state to state.

When a company sells a digital product in the EU, for VAT the supply will sourced to the country of destination, i.e. the country where the customer is established or if not available, where the customer has her permanent address or usually resides. For example, if a customer in Hungary downloads software from a Luxembourg provider, VAT is due in Hungary and not in Luxembourg. So far, the approaches in the US and the EU seem fairly similar. However, the similarities largely end here.

Obligation to Collect

In the US, only a seller with nexus (i.e. physical presence) in the state must collect sales tax. Therefore, if the Massachusetts seller of digital products does not have nexus in Georgia, it has no obligation to collect Georgia sales tax.

In the EU, the concept of nexus does not apply. Rather the obligation to collect turns on whether the customer is a taxable person (generally a business with a valid VAT registration number) or a non-taxable person (e.g. a private consumer). If the sale is to a taxable person, then the supplier is not required to collect VAT. However, if the sale is to a non-taxable person, the supplier must collect the VAT in the customer’s country. Turning to our earlier example, if the Hungarian customer is private person, the Luxembourg seller must collect the applicable Hungarian VAT on the supply.

Taxability

In the US, even assuming the seller has obligation to collect at the location of the sale, whether sales tax applies on the digital product varies from state to state and from product to product. For example, even when the Massachusetts seller has nexus in Georgia, it still does not collect sales tax on the sale of downloaded software because Georgia considers the sale to represent the transfer of a non-taxable intangible. If the sale is to a customer in Pennsylvania, the seller with nexus in Pennsylvania must collect the applicable Pennsylvania tax because electronic software is taxable under Pennsylvania law.

In the EU, digital products are considered electronically supplies services and under the EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC, these services are taxable at the applicable standard rate. Therefore, the Luxembourg supplier must collect the 27% Hungarian VAT on the transfer of downloaded software to a private customer in Hungary.

This article covers just some of the surface level complexities surrounding selling digital products in the US and the EU. Sovos Compliance provides comprehensive support for the sales of digital products globally, ensuring that your business remains compliant in this complex area of indirect tax.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Timur Feinstein

Timur is the Director – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos. Timur uses his eleven-plus years of experience to lead a team of tax professionals focusing on VAT determination and reporting. An attorney by trade, Timur is a member of both the Massachusetts and New York Bars. He holds a B.S. in Finance from Bentley University and a J.D. from Boston University School of Law. Timur is fluent in Russian.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]