Tax Compliance for Insurers Intensifies – the Cost of Getting it Wrong

Hooda Greig
April 13, 2021

Tax authorities have increased their focus on the insurance industry to ensure Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) and parafiscal taxes are collected correctly, accurately, and on time.

Operating in multiple countries inevitably means also having to comply with many local regulations in line with IPT statutory and parafiscal filing. Compliance regimes can be simple or complex, but the difficulty is that they’re varied.

Territories change their filing regulations frequently and without a representative in the territory it can be difficult to keep abreast of these changes. Filing administration can also be a hard to navigate as many counties require filing to be in their local language and have a set filing date. Without key local knowledge and expertise, insurers can run the risk of noncompliance. The consequences can be severe so it’s important to understand each territory’s specific requirements.

What are the consequences of IPT noncompliance?

The consequences of IPT noncompliance aren’t limited to statutory or legal penalties, the indirect costs to a company are often more significant. These include the inconvenience and cost of correcting a mistake, additional associate or representative costs and noncompliance could also have an impact on the company’s reputation.

The most common consequence for late or incorrect filings are penalties and interest but if there are inaccuracies in monthly reporting this could lead to audits from the tax authorities.

Territories with particularly strict penalties for late filings and correcting include Great Britain, Germany, Spain and Italy.

Great Britain IPT penalties

  • Reference: Para 15, Sch 7, FA 1994 and para 4, Sch 24, FA 2007
  • Penalties can range between GBP 250 and 5% of the unpaid tax, with a penalty of GBP 20.00 per day after the due date
  • Inaccurate filing or payments can be charged between 0-100% depending on whether the disclosure is prompted or unprompted and whether the error was careless, deliberate or deliberate and concealed. HMRC officers can exercise discretion within the confines of the penalty regime

Germany IPT penalties

  • Late filing penalty can be up to 10% of the unpaid tax (Section 152 of the German Fiscal Code) Late payments penalty is 1% of the unpaid tax amount (Section 240 of the German Fiscal Code)
  • Late or corrected declarations usually involve further requests from the German tax authority to clarify the submission
  • Corrections of the return shouldn’t be subject to the late filing penalty, however, if the reason for the filing is not deemed ‘excusable’ it may lead to a penalty

Spain IPT penalties

  • Late filing or payment (Artículo 27.1 de la LGT) can be up to 20% of the unpaid tax
  • The penalty amount will be reduced by 25% if the payment is made within the prescribed period set by the tax authorities and in a legally established manner
  • In case of non-payment of the penalty, the penalty amount can increase by up to 20% with the tax authorities having the power to physically enforce the debt

Italy IPT late filing penalties

  • Time-based penalties and interest apply. The penalty percentage is banded depending on the number of days after the deadline the tax is settled and can be up to 5%. Additional interest is charged daily at the prevailing annual rate
  • Keeping IPT Books is a legal requirement and should be readily presented when requested. Failure to do so can lead to penalties being applied for non-compliant or missing IPT Books

Although penalties might not be imposed in most territories with an IPT regime in Europe, interest will almost certainly be applied to any late payments or non-submission declarations.

In addition to the monthly statutory filing, some territories require annual reporting for IPT and parafiscal taxes and failure to submit these reports will also attract penalties. Tax authorities can also request detailed information at the insured level, with some requiring insured policyholder details to be reported.

An increasing number of tax authorities have introduced online submissions to close the tax gap and provide greater transparency and accuracy in the collection of taxes.

Insurers need to be aware of their compliance responsibilities by keeping pace with this heightened degree of complexity, scrutiny and change. It’s becoming essential for insurers to have a dedicated team for compliance risk management.

Take Action

To learn more about upcoming changes across Europe, download our recent webinar “IPT regulation changes in Europe: Are you prepared?

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Hooda Greig

Hooda is a compliance services manager for IPT. She joined Sovos in 2017 bringing experience and a background in personal and business tax consulting and compliance. Hooda leads a team that deliver IPT compliance services across Europe. She completed her studies at The Tax Institute, North West University, South Africa.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]