IPT Calculations: The Importance of Getting it Right

Andrew Hocking
April 7, 2020

We are in unprecedented times where hour-by-hour change has become the new norm. This is particularly true across our industry as governments evaluate and assess every direct and indirect tax at their disposal as part of broader economic stimulus measure.

Tax authorities across the world – national, regional and overseas territories – have acted decisively in recent weeks. Measures include headline-grabbing tax deference schemes, new exemptions designed to prop up particularly at-risk industries, and tax digitisation postponements.

So far though, IPT has broadly escaped change.

Portugal may have postponed its new Stamp Duty reporting system until January 2021 following a state of emergency and four Spanish provinces have allowed insurers to defer their insurance premium tax payments, yet aside from those specific examples, widespread alterations have been minimal.

This is unlikely to be the case forever. We could well see the same happen to IPT as has to VAT and Corporate Tax. If these changes do trickle down (or perhaps, when they do, depending on your stance), payment and filing adjustments may have to take place urgently.

Cross-border IPT determination is complex at the best of times. Now, even more than ever, insurers large and small should be closely monitoring their tax obligations as well as the graces available to them.

It is certainly not the time to incorrectly calculate IPT for three reasons:

1.      Commercially, as there is a common need to preserve liquidity

2.      Productivity, so people and departments stay as efficient as possible

3.      Compliance, for regulatory peace of mind

Bolster bottom lines

It is vital that any insurer maintains as buoyant a bottom line as possible during these choppy times. The longer organisations can protect cash reserves, the better.

From a practical perspective, this means taking advantage of any IPT deference schemes (if and when they become available in coming months), reducing overpayments and preventing underpayments, and keeping abreast with any new notifications. IPT could well change at short notice, so having the capacity to adapt rapidly is crucial too.  

Productive people

Secondly, once the dust starts to settle and everyone acclimatises to this ‘new normal’ as best they can, companies will expect their tax managers to maintain the same care and attention to detail as always. Remitting IPT at the correct rate, yet at the ideal time, across every region the company is operating in, will be important to keeping business flowing throughout the business.   

Audit assurances

Lastly, once tax authorities themselves start to audit historical returns from this period (however long that might take them), auditors will be carefully reviewing every company’s IPT obligations to ensure the organisation has paid the tax expected of them.

At this moment in time, it’s unclear and highly unlikely that tax authorities will grant reprieves for this period because of the exceptional circumstances, so it’s safer and wiser, reputationally and financially, to correctly calculate your IPT and to file it in line with the constantly evolving guidance issued. 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Andrew Hocking

Director of Managed Services. Andrew is the Director of Sovos’ Managed Services group in Europe. Based in London, he leads teams specialising in IPT and VAT compliance and fiscal representation in over 30 countries. Andrew holds qualifications in Finance and Business Law, and is a qualified Chartered Accountant with over 10 years experience in indirect tax and technology.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]