Misplaced Confidence? Financial Institutions Could Be Underestimating the Challenge of CRS

Scott Freedman
June 28, 2017

In the iconic 1997 movie Wag the Dog, Hollywood producer Stanley Motss — played by Dustin Hoffman — has the same reaction to every problem he faces. “This is nothing!” he says repeatedly in his quest to get an unpopular president reelected. His overconfidence, however, ends up having serious consequences as the movie’s dark plot unfolds.

Fast forward 20 years, and the echoes of Stanley Motss seem to be ringing around financial institutions — but this time the challenge is remaining compliant with FATCA and the emerging Common Reporting Standard (CRS) for tax information reporting. New reporting standards are a major concern for financial institutions because running afoul of CRS or FATCA could lead to significant financial penalties, damaged reputations and ultimately a loss of both customers and profit margins.

A Relatively Positive Outlook

Sovos conducted a survey in May — just before UK’s CRS transmittals were due for submission — that revealed technology professionals at financial institutions felt pretty good about their firms’ first UK CRS submissions. Is their confidence misplaced? A comparison to an Aberdeen Group survey from a year earlier suggests it might be.

In June 2016, Sovos commissioned and Aberdeen conducted a survey of leaders at 100 top financial institutions subject to AEOI rules developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to combat tax evasion. Respondents to the Aberdeen survey still had a significant amount of time to prepare for CRS filings and to make plans for centralizing compliance procedures.

Almost a year later, the most recent Sovos survey used responses from Banking Technology readers. While the audiences for the two surveys varied slightly, they did share many common characteristics — including a reach of over 100 top financial institutions. The Banking Technology survey took place just before the UK CRS 2016 tax year reporting deadline of May 31, 2017.

Despite a prediction by Sovos that 60 per cent of filings submitted to ‘early adopter’ tax jurisdictions for the first CRS exchange may be rejected, more than half of respondents to the Banking Technology survey felt no more than 20 per cent of their transmittals would be rejected.

Fewer than 10 per cent of respondents thought the number of rejected transmittals could reach 60 per cent. Furthermore, 60 per cent of respondents thought they would only need to re-submit their filings once before achieving acceptance.

Potential Trouble Ahead?

However, some of the numbers in Aberdeen’s survey should perhaps serve as a warning. Aberdeen found only 44 per cent of FATCA filings were accurate, despite the fact that 64 per cent of survey respondents considered themselves “significantly prepared” to deal with FATCA.

Perhaps most tellingly, 97 per cent of Aberdeen respondents said they would be subject to FATCA, while just 65 per cent said they would be subject to CRS. The kicker? All institutions that must comply with FATCA must also comply with CRS.

Even though the two surveys show some large discrepancies, there are areas of agreement. Keeping up with changing compliance regulations is a major concern for financial institutions represented in both surveys, as is collecting and reporting data to multiple jurisdictions. Financial institutions in both surveys are in agreement as to how they plan to stay in compliance with evolving standards, too.

Prioritising Centralisation

Both the Aberdeen and Banking Technology surveys reveal centralising compliance procedures as a major priority. However, numbers from the second survey should raise some questions as to how effectively financial institutions are carrying out the centralisation process.

In the Aberdeen survey from 2016, 94 per cent of respondents said they would centralise compliance procedures. One year later in the Banking Technology survey, only 70 per cent of respondents reported having an initiative in place to centralise and automate compliance functions.

Nevertheless, it is safe to conclude centralising compliance is a high priority for many organisations. Of the 70 per cent of Banking Technology respondents who reported having plans to centralise and automate compliance functions, 75 per cent said their organisations’ boards of directors were directly involved in the initiative.

Financial institutions in both surveys are on the right track to keep up with new compliance standards in that they are at some stage of centralising compliance teams and automating reporting processes. But the firms involved in the more recent survey should perhaps tone down their confidence a bit and exercise some caution. After all — spoiler alert — things did not end well for Stanley Motss. These organisations will need to work hard to avoid a similar fate.

Take Action

Download the infographic from the Banking Technology survey.

Read the full Aberdeen Report and learn more about the Sovos AEOI solution.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Scott Freedman

Scott Freedman is Director of Product Strategy for AEOI solutions at Sovos. Scott has over 15 years of experience in strategic marketing and product strategy. He has worked for business-to-business software and SaaS solution companies like Thomson Reuters and with Fortune 500 companies as a business consultant. Scott has a background in law and earned his J.D. and undergraduate degrees from the University of Chicago and University of Illinois.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]