Massachusetts Adopts an Economic Nexus Standard For Remote Sellers and Vendors

Steven Claflin
April 20, 2017

This blog was last updated on June 27, 2021

Remote sales continue to be an ongoing concern for vendors trying to stay compliant with state and local taxing authorities.  Massachusetts joins a growing list of states that have adopted their own laws and regulations. On April 3, Massachusetts joined the ranks of states defying the Quill decision with its variation on economic nexus for remote sellers. As a growing number of states establish different economic nexus standards and reporting requirements, many companies continue to navigate the complex web of regulations wondering where and when they are obligated to collect tax on remote sales.

Massachusetts Directive 17-1

Massachusetts Directive 17-1 establishes an economic nexus standard for out-of-state vendors. Under this new rule, starting on July 1, the state would replace the existing “physical presence” standard as defined by the famous Quill v. North Dakota Supreme Court decision with a new requirement. This requirement specifies all vendors making at least $500,000 or more than 100 sales into Massachusetts will need to collect and remit tax when selling to Massachusetts customers. The state’s new approach to economic nexus for remote sellers is unconstitutional. As has been the case in other states that enacted similar rules, we expect litigation to stop the state from enforcing Directive 17-1.

A Complex Web of Regulations

Remote sales continue to be an ongoing concern for companies trying to stay compliant with state and local taxing authorities. With this step, Massachusetts joins a growing list of states including Alabama, Colorado, South Dakota, Vermont, Tennessee and Wyoming that have adopted their own laws and regulations. Unfortunately, requirements can differ greatly from state to state:

  •  In contrast to Massachusetts’ $500,000 or 100+ sales threshold, Wyoming requires vendors to collect and remit when sales into the state reach just $100,000 or 200+ sales. Alabama, on the other hand, has a $250,000 threshold.
  •  In Alabama, remote sellers can opt to take advantage of the Simplified Sellers Use Tax Remittance Program which significantly eases the compliance burden. The other states imposing economic nexus do not offer similar programs.
  •  In Colorado and a handful of other states, sellers are not required to collect tax, but must comply with reporting obligations that may be more complicated than tax collection.

One Company’s Approach: Amazon

Amazon recently agreed to collect sales tax on transactions in every state that has a tax, recognizing the emerging trend of states aggressively going after out-of-state sellers. Rather than fight this trend, Amazon likely decided to focus on strategic business initiatives. Whether it’s via federal legislation or state rules leading to a Supreme Court showdown, many believe remote sellers will inevitably need to collect sales tax on transactions in all states where they have significant sales volume.

Managing Compliance Going Forward

This complex and rapidly changing compliance landscape creates unique challenges for organizations that have existing or growing ecommerce channels. It’s not surprising that organizations are struggling. Compliance should not be a barrier to growth. At the same time, ignoring existing and upcoming legal requirements is not a viable long term strategy. Proactive organizations should be looking for approaches to compliance and technology that help provide platforms for growth to help them manage taxability, exemptions and filing across all their business channels. Businesses are looking for solutions that provide the tools they need today and the ability to rapidly adapt in the future as online legislation continues to evolve.

Take Action

Read more about Amazon’s policy on collecting sales tax. Find out how Sovos Enterprise Sales Tax solutions help online sellers stay compliant.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Steven Claflin

Steven Claflin is a Regulatory Counsel at Sovos. Within Sovos’ Regulatory Analysis function, Steve’s main focus is legal research on indirect taxes in the United States. He received a B.S. from Bridgewater State University and J.D. magna cum laude from University of New Hampshire School of Law. He is a member of both the Massachusetts and New Hampshire Bars.
Share this post

Hungary Supplemental Insurance Premium Tax
EMEA IPT
July 11, 2022
Extra Profit Tax: An Introduction to Supplemental IPT in Hungary

This blog was last updated on October 28, 2024 Update 7 October 2024 by Edit Buliczka Hungarian Tax Office Updates IPT Declaration Form for 2023 The procedure necessary to correct an underdeclared premium figure in Hungary can be complicated. The complexity of a correction for return form 2320 has become even more challenging. Following a […]

2025 bond project
North America Tax Information Reporting
November 4, 2024
The Insurer’s Guide to the 2025 Bond Project

This blog was last updated on November 4, 2024 The regulatory landscape for insurance companies is undergoing significant changes with the Principles-Based Bond Project which is set to take effect on January 1, 2025. These changes, driven by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), will impact how insurance companies classify and value bond investments, […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 1, 2024
New ViDA Proposal Set for ECOFIN Approval

This blog was last updated on November 1, 2024 The Council of the European Union has released a new proposal regarding the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) reform. The proposal aims to modernise and streamline VAT systems across the EU, notably e-invoicing and Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC). Members States will review it on 5 […]

what is peppol
E-Invoicing Compliance North America
October 29, 2024
What it is PEPPOL?

This blog was last updated on October 29, 2024 Peppol E-invoicing explained: What it is and how it works The global adoption of electronic invoicing is accelerating. Governments worldwide are pushing to adopt e-invoicing to digitally transform their national systems and, often, to close the VAT gap. While many countries have introduced their own e-invoicing […]

remote sellers sales tax
North America Sales & Use Tax
October 28, 2024
Will Congress Act to Simplify Remote Seller Sales Tax Collection

This blog was last updated on November 5, 2024 When the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2018, that South Dakota’s law imposing sales tax collection requirements on sellers without in-state physical presence was constitutional, it did not grant states free reign. States are still responsible for ensuring that their sales tax requirements are manageable, […]

dtc shipping laws for craft spirits
North America ShipCompliant
October 23, 2024
Why It’s Time to Reform DtC Shipping Laws for Craft Spirits

This blog was last updated on November 5, 2024 While wine lovers have enjoyed the convenience of direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping for nearly two decades, the craft spirits market is still not afforded the same access. Outdated and restrictive spirits shipping laws have kept the spirits industry from fully leveraging the benefits of DtC shipping, leaving […]