Key Considerations for Peru’s Expanding E-Invoicing Mandates

Steve Sprague
April 13, 2015

As e-invoicing mandates continue to spread throughout Latin America, it’s becoming increasingly important for companies to have a regional compliance partner that proactively monitors and responds to the ever-changing compliance landscape. As we explored previously, three countries are beginning to enforce compliance measures this year: Peru, Uruguay and Ecuador. While the legislation in each country affects businesses similarly and was introduced for a common purpose – ensuring the accuracy of value-added tax deductions and auditing and fining companies for errors – the specifics of each legislation can vary greatly.

In part two of our four-part series, we’ll examine the mandates in Peru. Peru began testing e-invoicing mandates in 2014 with a group of 239 companies. This quarter, the This quarter Peru's Tax Authority (SUNAT) starts rolling out  mandates to 200 more large multinational and 5,000 medium sized companiesrollout expands to 200 large multinationals and 5,000 medium companies. Later in the year, an additional 750 companies will be added to that group. Essentially, if your income was 150 UIT or greater last year, you will be required to record sales and purchases electronically.

Key requirements in Peru include:

  • Accounts receivable: Invoices must be submitted to and approved by the SUNAT (Peru’s tax authority) prior to sending to the customer.
  • Shipping: When transporting goods, a government approved invoice and bill of lading (Guia De Remision) must accompany the shipment.
  • Certification: Your compliance program, including invoice submission, payables, reporting and contingency planning must be tested and certified. You have 25 days to complete this process from the date you file an application with the government.
  • Contingency: If systems are down, you must send the SUNAT a daily summary of records.
  • Storage: Records must be stored for four years and must be available to clients via the government’s web service for one year.
  • Cancellations: You only have 72 hours after receiving an invoice to dispute or cancel it; otherwise, the SUNAT considers it verified and approved.

As you evaluate solutions for Peru compliance, here are five key questions to ask:

  1. Does your solution integrate with your existing ERP framework, eliminating the risk of data manipulation in external systems?
  2. Does your solution support change management for frequent updates to the Peruvian requirements?
  3. Do you have one end-to-end platform for all components of the Peru mandates, including e-invoicing, receivables, payables, transit and reporting? Or, are you maintaining multiple systems?
  4. Will you be able to get support when you need it?
  5. Do you know what to expect in terms of budget? Or, will each regulation change require a substantial additional expenditure?

As these mandates continue to change, it’s important to select a proactive partner that will help you navigate these murky waters seamlessly. You can learn more by listening to our recent webinar: Peru 2015 Mandates: How to Leverage SAP to Maintain Compliance.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Steve Sprague

Como director comercial, Steve Sprague dirige la estrategia corporativa, las iniciativas de penetración de mercado y de field enablement para el negocio del impuesto sobre el valor añadido global (GVAT) de la empresa. El estilo de liderazgo de Steve se basa en su convicción de que, para que las organizaciones tengan éxito, deben comprometerse e invertir en los tres pilares estratégicos de la empresa: las personas, las prácticas y los productos.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]