In Focus: France’s IPT Landscape

Christophe Bourdaire
June 17, 2020

France is usually known for the complexity of its insurance premium tax filing system with many parafiscal charges potentially applying to insurance premiums and with many overseas territories where IPT should be filed directly. Over the last decade, France has either introduced new taxes and contributions on insurance premiums or increased rates. Now, as for all nations, the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to add to the complexity.

Multiple IPT rates and multiple parafiscal charges

The French IPT rate is commonly understood to be 9%.  However, multiple IPT rates apply depending on the type of risks covered in France ranging from 7% to 30%. And, when a policy covers multiple risks, the premium should be split accordingly in order to apply the correct IPT rate on each portion. There are also up to 10 parafiscal charges that may be due on insurance premiums. Rates vary from €0.02 per person insured (contribution on Hunting Liability insurance) to 100% (contribution to the National Agricultural Catastrophe Fund for insurance of shellfish plants). If part of these parafiscal charges are filed under the IPT return, the other contributions should be filed to the local Guarantee Fund and the URSSAF, which can require two additional registrations.

Overseas complexities

When it comes to French overseas territories, the distinction must be made between so called Départements and Régions d’Outre-Mer and Collectivités d’Outre-Mer. In other words, the first group – known as DROMs – are treated the same as for mainland France for premium tax purposes.  Premiums covering risks located in these territories should be declared in the same way, although with an asterisk for Guyane and Mayotte where the IPT rates applicable are reduced by half. For the second group – known as COMs – the local tax authority for each of them can levy taxes on insurance premiums. As such, most of them have set up their own IPT regimes, often requiring insurers to appoint a fiscal representative. It’s worth adding that some French parafiscal charges may also still be due too.

The Business Interruption question

As in many countries, COVID-19 has hit many French businesses who have not been able to claim compensation for the business interruption caused by the pandemic as it is not deemed to be related to a material damage. Current insurance schemes, like the CatNat regime, do not apply to this type of loss. Discussions are currently being held between insurers and the French government to design an insurance scheme that will cover other future major events such as pandemics.

The idea of replicating the CatNat regime to pandemics is popular. In such schemes, both insurers and insureds must contribute, and an unlimited State guarantee provides a better compensation. In practice, if such scheme were implemented, this would mean that an additional premium would be collected from the insured with the possibility to either levy taxes and contributions on this additional taxable basis or exempt it in order to give an incentive to insureds to cover themselves against pandemic risks.

Take Action

Keep up to date with the latest developments by subscribing to our blogs and following us on LinkedIn and Twitter. We also host regular webinars with our in-house specialists who are on hand to help.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Christophe Bourdaire

Senior Regulatory Specialist, Regulatory Analysis. Christophe joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2011 and has been managing the IPT compliance process for a portfolio of captives and French speaking clients. Based in France, he focuses on the development of the global IPT content and technology offering. Christophe completed a degree (certificate) in Journalism at Ecole Nouvelles in Nice, France. He is a native French speaker, and also speaks fluent Spanish.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]