HMRC’s Second IPT Consultation – Response Deadline Fast Approaching

Elliot Shulver
January 21, 2021

This blog was last updated on January 11, 2024

HMRC, the UK’s tax authority, is asking for responses to its Insurance Premium Tax: Administration and Unfair Outcomes Consultation, by 5 February 2021.

The first consultation and call for evidence for Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) was back in 2019 and questions focused on the modernisation of IPT and efficiency improvements for businesses and HMRC. It also considered unfair practices and tax outcomes and how to address them.

The consultation outcomes were published in July 2020 but there were only 27 responses received from the insurance industry. This meant that there was no clear evidence that specific changes to IPT needed to be made and therefore a further consultation was issued to collect more specific responses. The hope is that the second consultation will receive a higher number of responses and provide a more extensive view of the industry’s opinion on proposed approaches.

The aim of the consultation

The second consultation was issued in November 2020 and responses are due by 5 February 2021. As with the first consultation, the aim is to find measures that make the IPT administration process more efficient for both the insurance industry and HMRC and to tackle IPT avoidance and evasion.

This second consultation focuses more on administration and unfair outcomes with three key chapters: unregistered insurers, avoidance structures and administration of IPT. The consultation document puts forth a number of potential approaches for each topic, with specific questions for each option for the industry to provide their feedback and insights.

Some specific IPT challenges up for discussion include tax avoidance through ‘value shifting’, which is when a broker charges a fee to the insured via a separate contract and in turn the insurer will lower the premium. This results in lower IPT being paid.

Frequency of IPT declarations

There is also discussion around changing the frequency of the IPT return declaration from quarterly to annually, with larger taxpayers paying quarterly amounts on account. Germany already has a similar scheme where smaller taxpayers can file returns at a lower frequency (i.e. annually instead of monthly) if they are below a certain tax threshold. This provides the benefit of reduced admin for both the taxpayer and tax authority.

HMRC hopes this second consultation will reveal insight into how the industry would like to tackle some of these issues and help shape the framework of future legislation. We will provide an update once results are published later this year.

Take Action

Get in touch about the benefits a managed service provider can offer to ease your IPT compliance burden.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Consulting Manager, IPT compliance for indirect taxes at Sovos. A chartered accountant with 6 years’ experience of indirect tax, including IPT, VAT and Gambling Duties, Elliot is responsible for our Consultancy practice, as well as providing regulatory updates for our global compliance solution suite.
Share this post

customer centric
North America Tax Compliance
January 7, 2025
“The first step to being customer centric is being with the client through thick and thin”

This blog was last updated on January 7, 2025 Interview with: Sergio Severo, Managing Director Sovos Latin America He was seriously considering retiring after an extensive and remarkable professional career when he received an invitation to lead our team in the region. Something about Sovos caught Sergio Severo’s attention, prompting him to abandon his retirement […]

agent of the consumer tnabc
North America ShipCompliant
January 6, 2025
TNABC Warns DtC Shippers Against ‘Agent of Consumer’ Sales

This blog was last updated on January 8, 2025 Learn why Tennessee’s Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TNABC) is cracking down on ‘agent of the consumer’ sales for DtC wine shippers. The Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TNABC) recently sent a notice to licensed direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shippers indicating that shipping as an “agent of the consumer” is […]

california unclaimed property notice
North America Unclaimed Property
January 6, 2025
California’s Unclaimed Property Crackdown: How to Respond to Notices

This blog was last updated on January 10, 2025 Learn how to respond to California’s unclaimed property notices. Avoid audits, penalties, and interest with timely actions and the Voluntary Compliance Program. Be aware! California is ramping up its enforcement of unclaimed property law, and businesses are in the crosshairs. Recently, the State Controller’s Office (SCO) […]

SAP Clean Core implementation
North America Tax Compliance
January 6, 2025
SAP: Your Business’ Path to Clean Core

This blog was last updated on January 10, 2025 In the first blog in our series, we introduced SAP Clean Core concept and how much is being made about its impact on business, specifically the ability to customize an ERP to meet operational needs. In part two, we addressed how businesses can use the SAP […]

alcohol deliveries
North America ShipCompliant
December 20, 2024
What if No One is Home to Sign for an Alcohol Delivery?

This blog was last updated on January 2, 2025 When no one is home to sign for an alcohol delivery, it becomes more than just a minor hiccup for direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers. It’s a domino effect that transforms a perfectly curated product into a customer’s disappointment before it’s ever opened. This becomes an even […]