Filing Premium Taxes When Non-Authorised Insurer

Elliot Shulver
July 30, 2020

A non-authorised insurer is the term used to describe an insurance company that isn’t licensed with a particular country to provide insurance. This can also be known as non-admitted insurance. The non-authorised insurer doesn’t have to comply with local laws and regulations, however, one consequence of not being authorised means it doesn’t get the same protection as an authorised insurer.

A non-authorised status doesn’t always mean the insurer can’t provide insurance services in that territory. The insurer can still offer insurance products, although through a registered broker or intermediary in the territory, or where allowed, the insurer can insure products directly with local policyholders in so far as the policyholder makes the first approach to the insurer.

It’s important to know that some countries don’t allow non-admitted business at all. This could be to preserve the local insurance market or to protect the policyholders in their country. This can be a challenge for a foreign insurer and prove to be almost impossible for them to do business in that country without local help. In some jurisdictions though, some exceptions may be granted and specific risks such as international cargo, marine and aviation insurance can be written on a non-admitted basis.

Knowing where the obligation lies

Where insurance premium taxes (IPT) are concerned, there may be a few different methods when declaring the taxes and insurers should recognise where the obligation and responsibility sits. Some countries may require the foreign insurer to register for tax purposes in order to settle their tax liabilities. Others will require the policyholder or local broker to settle on the insurer’s behalf, removing this compliance obligation from the insurer. Knowing who the obligation lies with and recognising and applying the individual compliance needs for each country is an enormous step in being tax compliant. Once these parts are known, the action of declaring and settling the tax liability should be relatively straightforward to complete.

Some insurers that write large, complex global policies and where it may not be possible to meet the compliance needs of all territories where they have an insured risk could use a financial interest clause to cover all their risks. This financial interest clause (FInC) removes the need for tax compliance at a local level, as the global policy insures the balance sheet risk at the company’s headquarters. Should an event trigger a claim against the policy, the compensation will probably be paid out to the headquarters and not the local entity where the event occurred. This has administration benefits and compliance benefits as the policy should only trigger IPT where the headquarters is situated.

Writing insurance business on a non-authorised basis can bring its own challenges regarding tax compliance. Understanding who bears the cost of the tax and who completes the returns and payments is crucial to ensure an insurer stays fully compliant. Using a financial interest clause can ease some compliance burden and can give an insurer coverage in countries where even non-admitted insurance is not allowed.

Take Action

Keep up to date with ever changing premium tax rules by subscribing to our blogs and following us on LinkedIn and Twitter. We also host regular webinars with our in-house specialists who are on hand to help.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Consulting Manager, IPT compliance for indirect taxes at Sovos. A chartered accountant with 6 years’ experience of indirect tax, including IPT, VAT and Gambling Duties, Elliot is responsible for our Consultancy practice, as well as providing regulatory updates for our global compliance solution suite.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]