Does the Market Require E-Invoicing Compliance and VAT Automation in One Service?

Christiaan Van Der Valk
September 12, 2017

Two years ago, a small number of forward-looking enterprises issued RFPs requesting ‘end-to-end invoice compliance automation services’. These RFPs requested all VAT-related compliance decisions to be managed through a single SaaS platform which integrated with the requesting company’s invoicing engine. In this article, we’re exploring the background and implications of this apparent evolution in market behavior.

Compliance automation vendor landscape challenged

This RFP approach puzzled the vendor community, which traditionally was used to these services being provided by at least two separate types of vendors:

  1. ‘Form compliance’ vendors, which usually have a background in ‘trust services’ that are rooted in public key infrastructure. These vendors specialize in ensuring compliance with requirements that aim to give tax administrations comfort that electronic invoices are worth looking at in the first place – which isn’t the case if you cannot be sure they aren’t fake or modified. These VAT requirements are about managing the evidence of integrity and authenticity of e-invoices throughout their legal life cycle.
  2. ‘Content compliance’ vendors, which usually have a background in legal information services. These vendors specialize in ‘tax engine’ functionality, which helps enterprises determine the applicable laws, associated VAT percentage or other transaction taxes when creating or receiving invoices. Some of these services also verify or suggest invoice notifications that are related to the tax percentage, or assist with reporting.

Importantly, the integration of these software packages (whether locally installed or consumed as a service via the internet) has historically taken place in different parts of the enterprise software ecosystem: form compliance vendors normally target transaction platforms, while content compliance vendors have nearly always been integrated with ERP systems. This varying focus has reinforced the notion that these are fundamentally different types of compliance automation functionality.

Reasons for a shift in market behavior

We have discussed this matter with a number of VAT managers who are thinking about their future needs in the VAT compliance automation area. Their assessment, alongside ours, consists of two interrelated components:

  1. Real-time controls increase exposure: the risks related to VAT discrepancies being exposed and caught by tax administrations is quickly increasing as a result of tax controls evolving from periodic aggregate reports to invoice-by-invoice real-time reporting or ‘clearance’ approvals.
  2. With VAT controls evolving from periodic to transactional and real-time, it will sometimes be more natural to apply tax determination functionality closer to transactional engines rather than close to the ERP. We particularly see this need arise in scenarios where a large part of the underlying business process is run by a third party vendor platform.

A case of market consolidation?

Would an enterprise looking for this next-generation combination of form and content compliance services necessarily care if they are provided by different vendors? The answer we received is ‘no, but’. ‘No’ because, ultimately, it’s for vendors to decide what is the most cost-effective way of managing skills and specialization to guarantee the best possible business value to their customers. ‘But’, because there are many administrative, legal, technical, operational and other issues that drive costs on the user side and which vendors are often not perfectly equipped to assess. When controls that businesses must perform are driven by the same body of law, and when they must be performed as part of the same enterprise process and system, companies will often expect to contract for such functionality with one and the same vendor to keep overhead in these areas to a minimum.

How will vendors adjust?

We at Sovos are thinking actively about the strategic impact of this shift in market expectations. As can be judged from recent press releases from other vendors in the broader compliance automation and e-invoicing space, we’re not the only ones.

We would be interested in your feedback on these matters:

  • Do you agree that this is a market trend?
  • Are you working on an RFP combining these compliance areas?
  • Are there other trends you believe we should consider in this context?

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Christiaan Van Der Valk

Christiaan Van Der Valk is vice president, strategy. Elected a World Economic Forum Global Leader for Tomorrow in 2000, Christiaan is an internationally recognized voice on e-business strategy, law, policy, best practice and commercial issues. Formerly co-founder and president of Trustweaver (acquired by Sovos), Christiaan also holds long-standing leadership roles at the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the European E-invoicing Service Providers Association (EESPA). Over the past 20 years, he has presented at and authored key papers for international meetings at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Asia Europe Meeting, World Trade Organization and several other UN agencies. Christiaan earned his Master of Laws degree from Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]