Does the Market Require E-Invoicing Compliance and VAT Automation in One Service?

Christiaan Van Der Valk
September 12, 2017

This blog was last updated on October 18, 2019

Two years ago, a small number of forward-looking enterprises issued RFPs requesting ‘end-to-end invoice compliance automation services’. These RFPs requested all VAT-related compliance decisions to be managed through a single SaaS platform which integrated with the requesting company’s invoicing engine. In this article, we’re exploring the background and implications of this apparent evolution in market behavior.

Compliance automation vendor landscape challenged

This RFP approach puzzled the vendor community, which traditionally was used to these services being provided by at least two separate types of vendors:

  1. ‘Form compliance’ vendors, which usually have a background in ‘trust services’ that are rooted in public key infrastructure. These vendors specialize in ensuring compliance with requirements that aim to give tax administrations comfort that electronic invoices are worth looking at in the first place – which isn’t the case if you cannot be sure they aren’t fake or modified. These VAT requirements are about managing the evidence of integrity and authenticity of e-invoices throughout their legal life cycle.
  2. ‘Content compliance’ vendors, which usually have a background in legal information services. These vendors specialize in ‘tax engine’ functionality, which helps enterprises determine the applicable laws, associated VAT percentage or other transaction taxes when creating or receiving invoices. Some of these services also verify or suggest invoice notifications that are related to the tax percentage, or assist with reporting.

Importantly, the integration of these software packages (whether locally installed or consumed as a service via the internet) has historically taken place in different parts of the enterprise software ecosystem: form compliance vendors normally target transaction platforms, while content compliance vendors have nearly always been integrated with ERP systems. This varying focus has reinforced the notion that these are fundamentally different types of compliance automation functionality.

Reasons for a shift in market behavior

We have discussed this matter with a number of VAT managers who are thinking about their future needs in the VAT compliance automation area. Their assessment, alongside ours, consists of two interrelated components:

  1. Real-time controls increase exposure: the risks related to VAT discrepancies being exposed and caught by tax administrations is quickly increasing as a result of tax controls evolving from periodic aggregate reports to invoice-by-invoice real-time reporting or ‘clearance’ approvals.
  2. With VAT controls evolving from periodic to transactional and real-time, it will sometimes be more natural to apply tax determination functionality closer to transactional engines rather than close to the ERP. We particularly see this need arise in scenarios where a large part of the underlying business process is run by a third party vendor platform.

A case of market consolidation?

Would an enterprise looking for this next-generation combination of form and content compliance services necessarily care if they are provided by different vendors? The answer we received is ‘no, but’. ‘No’ because, ultimately, it’s for vendors to decide what is the most cost-effective way of managing skills and specialization to guarantee the best possible business value to their customers. ‘But’, because there are many administrative, legal, technical, operational and other issues that drive costs on the user side and which vendors are often not perfectly equipped to assess. When controls that businesses must perform are driven by the same body of law, and when they must be performed as part of the same enterprise process and system, companies will often expect to contract for such functionality with one and the same vendor to keep overhead in these areas to a minimum.

How will vendors adjust?

We at Sovos are thinking actively about the strategic impact of this shift in market expectations. As can be judged from recent press releases from other vendors in the broader compliance automation and e-invoicing space, we’re not the only ones.

We would be interested in your feedback on these matters:

  • Do you agree that this is a market trend?
  • Are you working on an RFP combining these compliance areas?
  • Are there other trends you believe we should consider in this context?

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Christiaan Van Der Valk

Christiaan Van Der Valk is vice president, strategy. Elected a World Economic Forum Global Leader for Tomorrow in 2000, Christiaan is an internationally recognized voice on e-business strategy, law, policy, best practice and commercial issues. Formerly co-founder and president of Trustweaver (acquired by Sovos), Christiaan also holds long-standing leadership roles at the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the European E-invoicing Service Providers Association (EESPA). Over the past 20 years, he has presented at and authored key papers for international meetings at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Asia Europe Meeting, World Trade Organization and several other UN agencies. Christiaan earned his Master of Laws degree from Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Share this post

alcohol deliveries
North America ShipCompliant
December 20, 2024
What if No One is Home to Sign for an Alcohol Delivery?

This blog was last updated on December 20, 2024 When no one is home to sign for an alcohol delivery, it becomes more than just a minor hiccup for direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers. It’s a domino effect that transforms a perfectly curated product into a customer’s disappointment before it’s ever opened. This becomes an even […]

taxation of motor insurance policies france
North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 18, 2024
Taxation of Motor Insurance Policies: France

This blog was last updated on December 18, 2024 France is one of the most challenging countries in Europe when it comes to the premium tax treatment of motor insurance policies. This is mainly due to the variety of taxes and charges that can apply and the differing treatment of different vehicle types. This blog […]

california bottle bill compliance
North America ShipCompliant
December 13, 2024
California Bottle Bill: Compliance Updates for Wine and Spirits

This blog was last updated on December 16, 2024 California’s bottle bill got a major upgrade earlier this year, and it’s changed the rules for wineries, distilleries and beverage distributors in a big way. For the first time, wine and spirits manufacturers will need to register with CalRecycle, report sales and pay California Redemption Value […]

unclaimed property compliance for wineries
North America ShipCompliant
December 12, 2024
Unclaimed Property Compliance: What Wineries and Wine Clubs Need to Know

This blog was last updated on December 12, 2024 Although hard to believe, unclaimed property obligations impact ALL industries, including wineries and other wine clubs. While most companies typically only associate unclaimed property with outstanding checks, including accounts payable and payroll, there are other exposures for wineries and wine clubs to consider. Understanding these risks […]

retail delivery fees for alcohol shipping
North America ShipCompliant
December 5, 2024
Navigating Retail Delivery Fees: A Guide for DtC Alcohol Sellers

This blog was last updated on December 5, 2024 Direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers are no strangers to navigating a complex regulatory landscape. However, recently, a new challenge has emerged—the rise of retail delivery fees. From excise taxes to shipping restrictions, the industry has long dealt with a maze of state-specific rules that require careful attention […]