3 Reasons You Could Fail an Audit in Latin America

Scott Lewin
June 12, 2014

Often in these articles, I describe the business process – but I wanted to look at Latin America E-Invoicing from an audit risk point of view. 

Often when we look at the issues, our IT teams think about interfaces and archives, but we don’t always look at the financial risk of systems in these Latin America countries.  Remember, in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and now Chile, the tax authorities have 100% real-time visibility into your invoice data.

 

Getting this wrong in Latin America means significant fines of 50% to 225% of the tax value on the invoices that are considered to be in violation. When you consider the tax rates in these countries, you can easily see fines in the hundreds of thousands to millions.  I was researching a company with a $90 million dollar revenue stream in Brazil the other day – and they are reporting a fine of almost $9 million for the year 2013 and I spoke to a company the other week that has already been fined $100K US dollars for 4 missing XML. That is right 4 XML caused a 6 figure fine as the XML is what is required for the audit and they were missing 4 of them which means their VAT deductions were too high as they couldn’t use that to substantiate their deductions.

 

Here are the top 3 reasons you could fail an audit in Latin America:

 

  1. You are manually validating your Inbound Account Payables invoices. When you consider that everyone makes mistake when typing (average is 3% data entry errors), large companies with significant invoice volume from a procurement perspective doing this manually will always amaze me. Remember, in VAT countries in Latin America, you pay your VAT remittances on the net of what you charge your customer minus what you pay your suppliers.  If you deduct too little, you won’t get your money back, and if you deduct too much you will pay fines. And most importantly, if you don’t have the XML that exactly matches what the government has to back up those deductions during an audit– you will definitely pay fines.  
  2. The goods you receive from suppliers don’t match the XML they sent – whether damaged in transit or some other area. Remember if you receive the goods, you are responsible for the tax obligation and the need to have a supplier update the XML. In the most severe cases, companies will do what is called “gating” in Brazil, where they won’t let the truck enter their grounds until the NFe matches the PO correctly and has been validated to be commercially accepted.
  3. You report on data that is different from the government site. Two examples, in Argentina you do not want to post the accounting document until you have the government verification. And in Chile – there are two status messages that come back from the government. You want to be sure that you have received both for your eBills before you process your Libros reports – this is most important at the end of the month.

 

So as you evaluate the costs of your systems – don’t just look at the IT costs. Ask yourself one question – Would your systems pass an audit in Latin America?

It’s tough enough to keep up with the tax rates, you shouldn’t have to worry that the IT system and its gaps are exposing you to potential million dollar fines.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Scott Lewin

Gain timely insight and important up to the minute information about the current legislative changes in Latin America, including Brazil Nota Fiscal, Mexico CFDI, Argentina AFIP and Chile DTE. Learn how these changes affect your operations, your finances and also your Information Technology teams.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]