What are RUUPA’s Pre-Presumption Outreach Requirements?

Freda Pepper
March 1, 2024

This blog was last updated on December 6, 2024

Managing compliance with unclaimed property has become challenging due to the constantly changing legislative environment. A recent obligation gaining traction among states, which companies must be mindful of, is the requirement to conduct outreach to owners before their property is considered abandoned. This obligation, referred to as “pre-presumption outreach,” stems from the enactment of the Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act of 2016 (“RUUPA”). According to RUUPA, holders are mandated to reach out to specific property owners if there has been no owner-generated activity for two years before their property is presumed abandoned.

RUUPA’s Pre-Presumption Outreach Requirements

Generally, RUUPA language reads as follows: 

If the holder does not send communications to the apparent owner of an account by first-class United States mail, the holder shall attempt to confirm the apparent owner’s interest in the property by sending the apparent owner an electronic-mail communication not later than two years after the apparent owner’s last indication of interest in the property. However, the holder promptly shall attempt to contact the apparent owner by first-class United States mail if:

  1. the holder does not have information needed to send the apparent owner an electronic mail communication or the holder believes that the apparent owner’s electronic mail address in the holder’s records is not valid;
  2. the holder receives notification that the electronic-mail communication was not received; or
  3. the apparent owner does not respond to the electronic-mail communication not later than 30 days after the communication was sent.

Consequently, in states where this language has been adopted, there is typically a mandate for holders to provide advance notice via email before the escheatment process, in addition to the required due diligence. This obligation is specific to property owners who receive communications from the holder through email. The pre-escheat notice becomes mandatory after two years of inactivity, regardless of the dormancy period applicable to the property type. It is essential to track the period of inactivity separately from the dormancy period. A follow up letter by U.S. mail must be sent if one of the three conditions above applies.

Per RUUPA, the pre-presumption outreach requirement applies to tax-deferred retirement accounts, custodial accounts for minors and securities-related accounts.  However, since the finalization of RUUPA, states selectively adopt and modify portions of RUUPA to align with their preferences. This trend is also evident in the pre-presumption outreach provision.

In practice, states seldom adopt the exact RUUPA provision, opting instead to tailor it to their specific needs. After examining all enacted pre-presumption outreach provisions, we can categorize the differences into three main areas: the types of property subject to the pre-presumption outreach obligation, the conditions triggering the requirement for pre-presumption outreach, and the mandate to follow up with outreach via U.S. Mail.

Property types requiring pre-presumption outreach by all holders

In implementing laws inspired by RUUPA, states have not necessarily applied the pre-presumption requirement to the same property types outlined in RUUPA. Instead, many states have expanded the scope of the requirement to encompass additional property types. Specifically, states have included the requirement for some combination of bank accounts, securities accounts, tax-deferred retirement accounts, fiduciary accounts and custodial accounts.

RUUPA’S Requirements leading to pre-presumption outreach obligation

According to RUUPA, if an owner’s account is designated for electronic mail and they do not receive communications via first-class mail from the holder, the holder is obligated to attempt confirmation of the owner’s interest in the property by sending an email no later than two years after the owner’s last indication of interest. However, states have also modified this aspect of the provision. some states requiring the outreach to owners that do not receive communications from the holder by first class mail on at least an annual basis.  Other states have extended the timeframe for conducting outreach from two to three years.

Requirements to follow up with U.S. mail

The requirements as to when holders must follow up the pre-presumption emails with first class mail have also been altered by several states.  The requirements for follow up with a U.S. mailing include any combination of the following:

  • The holder receives notification that the email was not received.
  • The owner does not respond within 30 days after the email was sent.
  • The holder does not have enough information to send an email.
  • The holder believes the email address to be invalid.

Similar to all unclaimed property requirements, keeping track of the differing pre-presumption outreach requirements and the changes thereto is a daunting task.  However, the importance of understanding the state requirements cannot be underestimated as the outcome of the pre-presumption outreach is a factor in determining the start of the dormancy clock.  If the holder receives a response to the outreach, the holder should document and update the date of last contact and the account is preserved from escheatment.

Take Action

Discover the top red flags that trigger an unclaimed property audit on our blog.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Freda Pepper

Share this post

alcohol deliveries
North America ShipCompliant
December 20, 2024
What if No One is Home to Sign for an Alcohol Delivery?

This blog was last updated on December 20, 2024 When no one is home to sign for an alcohol delivery, it becomes more than just a minor hiccup for direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers. It’s a domino effect that transforms a perfectly curated product into a customer’s disappointment before it’s ever opened. This becomes an even […]

taxation of motor insurance policies france
North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 18, 2024
Taxation of Motor Insurance Policies: France

This blog was last updated on December 18, 2024 France is one of the most challenging countries in Europe when it comes to the premium tax treatment of motor insurance policies. This is mainly due to the variety of taxes and charges that can apply and the differing treatment of different vehicle types. This blog […]

california bottle bill compliance
North America ShipCompliant
December 13, 2024
California Bottle Bill: Compliance Updates for Wine and Spirits

This blog was last updated on December 16, 2024 California’s bottle bill got a major upgrade earlier this year, and it’s changed the rules for wineries, distilleries and beverage distributors in a big way. For the first time, wine and spirits manufacturers will need to register with CalRecycle, report sales and pay California Redemption Value […]

unclaimed property compliance for wineries
North America ShipCompliant
December 12, 2024
Unclaimed Property Compliance: What Wineries and Wine Clubs Need to Know

This blog was last updated on December 12, 2024 Although hard to believe, unclaimed property obligations impact ALL industries, including wineries and other wine clubs. While most companies typically only associate unclaimed property with outstanding checks, including accounts payable and payroll, there are other exposures for wineries and wine clubs to consider. Understanding these risks […]

retail delivery fees for alcohol shipping
North America ShipCompliant
December 5, 2024
Navigating Retail Delivery Fees: A Guide for DtC Alcohol Sellers

This blog was last updated on December 5, 2024 Direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers are no strangers to navigating a complex regulatory landscape. However, recently, a new challenge has emerged—the rise of retail delivery fees. From excise taxes to shipping restrictions, the industry has long dealt with a maze of state-specific rules that require careful attention […]