Treasury To Reconsider IGA Status For Certain Jurisdictions

Stephen Kessinger
August 4, 2016

This blog was last updated on June 27, 2021

This week, the Treasury Department published Announcement 2016-27 detailing its plan to reevaluate jurisdictions whose FATCA Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) status is treated as “in effect.” This means that Foreign Financial Institutions (FFIs) in jurisdictions whose IGA is currently signed or considered in substance may face changes to how they report their FATCA returns to the IRS in March 2017.

FATCA IGA Background: How Did We Get Here?

Since 2013, the Treasury Department has considered as being “in effect” jurisdictions who have signed the IGA, but have not yet brought it into force.  In 2014, the Treasury Department made a similar decision for jurisdictions who have not even signed the IGA, but have agreed to the terms of the agreement (referred to as agreement “in-substance”). As a result, all of these jurisdictions had to maintain a firm resolve to bring the IGA into force. This arrangement works very well for FFIs in those jurisdictions, because they are permitted to get a Global Intermediary Identification Number (GIIN) to avoid the onerous withholding and likely did not have any reporting obligations since their Host Country Tax Authority is not required to report to the IRS.

What are the Implications of the Treasury Department’s Announcement 2016-27?

The new Treasury Department Announcement that it will reconsider each jurisdiction’s status one by one to ensure that it is maintaining that resolve to bring IGA into force, changes the previous operating procedure for these FFIs. If a jurisdiction wishes to retain its status, it must provide Treasury, by the end of this year with a “detailed explanation of why the jurisdiction has not yet brought the IGA into force and a step-by-step plan that the jurisdiction intends to follow…”  Moreover, the plan must include “expected dates for achieving each step.”  Failure to adhere to that timeline could result in Treasury determining that “the jurisdiction is no longer demonstrating firm resolve.” If the jurisdiction loses its status, then those FFIs must sign the FFI Agreement within 60 days.  This will require FFIs to commit substantial resources to identify and report on certain U.S. accounts and to withhold on payments to non-participating FFIs.

What Does this Mean for FFIs Operating in FATCA IGA Jurisdictions?

FFIs in jurisdictions who are up for IGA review should monitor the Treasury website to ensure they are still covered.  If they’re not, they may need to report next year along with other FFIs in jurisdictions that have no IGA; that reporting deadline is March 31.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Stephen Kessinger

Stephen Kessinger is a Regulatory Counsel for Sovos Compliance. Within Sovos’ Regulatory Analysis function, Stephen focuses on AEOI reporting, including FATCA, CDOT and CRS. Before joining Sovos, Stephen earned his B.A. from the University of Vermont, and his J.D. from Roger Williams School of Law. He currently is a member of the Massachusetts and Rhode Island Bar Associations.
Share this post

customer centric
North America Tax Compliance
January 7, 2025
“The first step to being customer centric is being with the client through thick and thin”

This blog was last updated on January 7, 2025 Interview with: Sergio Severo, Managing Director Sovos Latin America He was seriously considering retiring after an extensive and remarkable professional career when he received an invitation to lead our team in the region. Something about Sovos caught Sergio Severo’s attention, prompting him to abandon his retirement […]

agent of the consumer tnabc
North America ShipCompliant
January 6, 2025
TNABC Warns DtC Shippers Against ‘Agent of Consumer’ Sales

This blog was last updated on January 8, 2025 Learn why Tennessee’s Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TNABC) is cracking down on ‘agent of the consumer’ sales for DtC wine shippers. The Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TNABC) recently sent a notice to licensed direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shippers indicating that shipping as an “agent of the consumer” is […]

california unclaimed property notice
North America Unclaimed Property
January 6, 2025
California’s Unclaimed Property Crackdown: How to Respond to Notices

This blog was last updated on January 10, 2025 Learn how to respond to California’s unclaimed property notices. Avoid audits, penalties, and interest with timely actions and the Voluntary Compliance Program. Be aware! California is ramping up its enforcement of unclaimed property law, and businesses are in the crosshairs. Recently, the State Controller’s Office (SCO) […]

SAP Clean Core implementation
North America Tax Compliance
January 6, 2025
SAP: Your Business’ Path to Clean Core

This blog was last updated on January 10, 2025 In the first blog in our series, we introduced SAP Clean Core concept and how much is being made about its impact on business, specifically the ability to customize an ERP to meet operational needs. In part two, we addressed how businesses can use the SAP […]

alcohol deliveries
North America ShipCompliant
December 20, 2024
What if No One is Home to Sign for an Alcohol Delivery?

This blog was last updated on January 2, 2025 When no one is home to sign for an alcohol delivery, it becomes more than just a minor hiccup for direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers. It’s a domino effect that transforms a perfectly curated product into a customer’s disappointment before it’s ever opened. This becomes an even […]