Remote Sellers: What You Can Do to Prepare for Pending Legislation

Matt Walsh
February 6, 2017

Tax reporting rules for remote sellers may change if Congress approves pending federal legislation. Sellers should prepare for the potential impacts of these changes.

How Remote Sellers Can Prepare for Pending Sales Tax Legislation

States are struggling to capture lost sales tax revenue, but many have made attempts to change existing rules detailing when sellers need to collect tax. Several pending federal bills and proposals would also address this issue. These legislative developments could have significant impact on business processes for remote sellers, especially those who do not currently collect sales tax in all jurisdictions within the U.S. Businesses should be aware of these proposals and understand the potential impact each could have on their compliance obligations, as well as what steps to take if any of these proposals moves forward. Here are the four pieces of legislation that, if passed, will have sales tax repercussions for remote sellers:

  • The Destination Principle and the Remote Transaction Parity Act The RTPA requires most of the same simplifications as the MFA. It also adheres to the destination principle in determining where tax applies and offers liability relief.
  • No Regulation Without Representation Act and Nexus This bill would essentially mean businesses without a physical presence would not be required to collect tax. It would also remove affiliate nexus or click-through nexus laws  that have broadened the scope of what constitutes nexus.
  • Determination and the Marketplace Fairness Act The MFA maintains the destination principle for determining the location of tax, which dictates the tax rules apply in the place where the item is delivered to the customer. The bill provides liability relief to remote sellers using the certified software  and for mistakes made due to misinformation from or errors by the state.
  • The Online Sales Tax Simplification Act The OSSA takes a different approach to taxing remote sales. While the principle of allowing states to tax remote commerce remains the same, this proposal has markedly different rules for determining the tax rate, tax laws and location of the transaction than either the MFA or RTPA.

Though it is not clear which — if any — of these proposals will be enacted, the business impact of the MFA, RTPA or OSSA would be significant. As such, organizations selling across the US and not collecting sales tax currently should review each state in which they sell and consider what they would need to do to comply in each jurisdiction.

Take Action

To learn more about the business impacts of this pending legislation, download the full white paper Pending Federal Legislation Regarding Sales Tax Compliance for Remote Sellers.  

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Matt Walsh

Matt Walsh is the Principal of Indirect Tax. Matt and his department ensure all Sovos tax and reporting solutions are compliant with global indirect tax laws. He also provides strategic direction, guidance and recommendations for product enhancements and development. Matt is focused on fostering and managing government and industry relationships and has over 17 years of experience in compliance, including starting as a tax counsel in the tax department and then advancing from Manager to Director of Tax Research and from there to Senior Director of Tax to his present position. Prior to his time at Sovos, Matt was a Team Manager at John Hancock Financial Services. He is currently a member of the Technical Advisory Group of the OECD (Working Party #9), which drafts model legislation and implementation guidelines for the taxation of cross-border services. Matt has a B.S. in Business Administration from the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts (formerly North Adams State College) and a J.D. from the New England School of Law.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]