Nuances of State Reporting Series, No. 2: Top 10 List of State Reporting Challenges

Sovos
July 16, 2014

In recent years, states have faced budget deficits and are looking for ways to raise revenue without increasing taxes. One way to do this is to improve the enforcement of tax laws that are already on the books. Because of the improved enforcement, many companies are starting to receive penalties for requirements they didn’t know existed. Implementing strategies and policies to avoid these penalties is becoming more difficult every day. This article seeks to explain why being compliant with state reporting is so challenging 1.       41 States There are 41 states with an income tax and some form of withholding or reporting requirement. Each of these states has different regulations on what, when and how organizations must report to them. Many states mandate electronic reporting, yet there are states that still require paper returns. It can be difficult to keep track of the various regulatory obligations, especially considering many states are not extremely forthcoming about the updates that are constantly being made. It is common for a state to require information to be submitted by January 31, but often a state will not release their reporting specifications until the beginning of January. There are also instances of states releasing their specifications only to re-release them with substantial changes several weeks later. 2.       Where to look? Because every state does things slightly different, it can be challenging to locate the withholding and reporting requirements. Some state tax departments are diligent about updating a withholding guide yearly and posting it on their website. However, other states do not have a clear withholding guide, forcing tax compliance teams to search statutes, regulations, state tax websites and form instructions. Regulatory requirements can be hidden in seemingly unrelated content. For example, South Carolina requires certain backup withholding according to South Carolina’s 2008 Illegal Immigration Act. 3.       Unclear Requirements It’s great when a state provides a clear and concise information reporting guide. Unfortunately, many states do not specifically state what information returns are required and instead say something to the tune of “1099s that report withholding”.  But what does 1099 mean? Does that include 1098s, 1042, 1042-S or 5498 forms? This ambiguity can make it very difficult for businesses to ensure that they are maintaining tax reporting compliance. 4.       Impossible Requirements Often times, a state tax department will assert that they follow the Federal Publication 1220 for reporting 1099s. However, it is common that state agencies will not communicate what parts of Federal Publication 1220 they do or don’t follow. Colorado is one such example. Colorado’s FYI Withholding 7 publication requires 1099s that are submitted electronically to be in the 1220 format. However, Colorado’s systems were not updated to accept files with 1099-K returns even though the 1220 includes 1099-K information. For those states that require 1042-S reporting, many will not distinguish 1042-S from other 1099s and maintain that all 1099 reporting follow 1220 guidelines. This is an impossible requirement as 1042-S forms are not reported pursuant to the 1220 format but instead follow Publication 1187. 5.       Unwritten Requirements Too often states will have tax reporting policies that are not widely available or posted anywhere. There are several states that require reporting on Tax Exempt Government Bonds, also known as Muni-Bond Reporting. Three of these states do not post the specifications for this reporting and instead send each individual client the formatting requirements. 6.       Language Many states have an electronic filing requirement for those that file many information returns. What does electronic mean? Some states exclusively define electronic filing as electronic uploads onto their website, while other states also include submissions via CD in this definition. Pennsylvania, for example, requires payers filing 250 or more 1099-R forms to file electronically. However, Pennsylvania considers magnetic media submissions to be electronic. This is not consistent across every state so it is prudent to verify the methods of filing a state accepts and the state’s definition of each delivery method. 7.       Late Notice of Requirements/Changes The majority of states require information returns be submitted by February 28, with a few states due by January 31 or March 31. Wisconsin requires most information returns by January 31. This past year, Wisconsin didn’t release their Guide to Wage Statements and Information Returns until December. The guide that was released included an important change, no longer waiving the filing requirement for employers and other payers to submit W-2s and 1099s that did not report withholding. This is a huge change that came with only a forty-five days’ notice. 8.       CFS Confusion One of the most common questions we get is if organizations file information returns through the Combined Federal State (CFS) program, do they have any remaining direct state reporting obligations? There is a lot of confusion surrounding the CFS program, including what states participate in CFS, what forms CFS supports and what state requirements remain. The federal publication explaining CFS requirements lists Michigan and Louisiana as participating states, but these states do not accept CFS submissions. For those states that do participate, many still require direct reporting for 1099s that have state withholding. Not all 1099s have CFS forms and this also can be problematic. For those states that do not require direct reporting for returns with withholding, organization should be sure that there are not any other states requiring 1099s that aren’t CFS forms. 9.      State Call Centers not Equipped to Answer Questions After researching state withholding and reporting requirements, most tax compliance teams have a question or two. At this point, they must find the right phone number to call. Most states allow people to call the state tax department, but in California they need to know what type of withholding they are dealing with to determine whether they should call the Employment Development Department or the Franchise Tax Board. If the question is concerning a 1099-MISC payment, the call should go to the Franchise Tax Board. If the question is concerning a voluntary withholding payment on a 1099-MISC payment, they should call the Employment Development Department. Usually, there is a wait to get a hold of someone. On a normal day, this can be up to thirty minutes, but in tax season it’s usually much longer. 10.   Varying Answers from State Representatives After waiting on hold for 30 minutes, hopefully the person answering the phone is knowledgeable. Unfortunately, the reality is that many states do not have the resources to train their call center staff on the more nuanced issues. Often times, a representative will read straight from the withholding guide. If the call center representative does answer the question, it may be a different response than what someone else at the same call center will give. Varying answers from representatives are quite common and trusting any answer given is a risk often taken. However, it’s important to remember that advice given on the phone does not carry the weight of the law. State reporting is complex because of the variances in each state, from the definition of “electronic” to how states assemble the information for withholding guides. The “Nuances in State Reporting” series will highlight many of these challenges associated with state reporting and will provide guidance for overcoming the hurdles and ensuring accurate state reporting. To see the previous segment of this series click here.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sovos

Sovos is a global provider of tax, compliance and trust solutions and services that enable businesses to navigate an increasingly regulated world with true confidence. Purpose-built for always-on compliance capabilities, our scalable IT-driven solutions meet the demands of an evolving and complex global regulatory landscape. Sovos’ cloud-based software platform provides an unparalleled level of integration with business applications and government compliance processes. More than 100,000 customers in 100+ countries – including half the Fortune 500 – trust Sovos for their compliance needs. Sovos annually processes more than three billion transactions across 19,000 global tax jurisdictions. Bolstered by a robust partner program more than 400 strong, Sovos brings to bear an unrivaled global network for companies across industries and geographies. Founded in 1979, Sovos has operations across the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]