Missouri Voters to Decide on a Constitutional Ban on Taxing Services

Matt Walsh
November 4, 2016

This blog was last updated on June 26, 2021

Voters in Missouri are to decide on a Constitutional amendment restricting sales taxes on services.

Synopsis:

Missouri is voting on a constitutional amendment that could severely impact sales tax policy for generations.

The Election

This election season we are electing a new president, seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate are up for grabs; not to mention all the state and local level elected offices that will be decided in November. While they might not garner as much attention as the presidential race, there are a number of important ballot referendums and voter decided questions across the country which will significantly impact our day-to-day lives. A measure up for vote in Missouri offers an interesting approach to controlling sales and use tax law. Amendment 4, also called the Taxpayer Protection Amendment, is a voter referendum that would change the state constitution by adding a prohibition against charging sales or use tax on services provided in the state.

The Ballot Question

The question is presented on the ballot as follows:

  • Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to prohibit a new state or local sales/use or other similar tax on any service or transaction that was not subject to a sales/use or similar tax as of January 1, 2015?
  • Potential costs to state and local governmental entities are unknown, but could be significant.  The proposal’s passage would impact governmental entity’s ability to revise their tax structures.  State and local governments expect no savings from this proposal.

Fair Ballot Language:

  • YES: A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to prohibit a new state or local sales/use or other similar tax on any service or transaction. This amendment only applies to any service or transaction that was not subject to a sales/use or similar tax as of January 1, 2015
  • NO: A “no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution to prohibit such state or local sales/use or other similar tax.

Currently, Missouri law states that sales tax is properly charged on the sale of all tangible personal property and to certain specifically listed services (RSMo Sec. 144.021). The list of services currently subject to tax is limited to admissions to events and amusement parks, electricity and other utilities, and telecommunication services (RSMo Sec. 144.021).

Potential costs to state and local governmental entities are unknown, but could be significant.  The proposal’s passage would impact governmental entity’s ability to revise their tax structures.  State and local governments expect no savings from this proposal.

The Argument in Support

Those in favor of the measure argue that: “Missourians rely on all sorts of basic services every day. Haircuts, manicures, shoe repairs; the services of a family doctor, a lawyer or accountant; the lease on a family’s home. Those services are now tax-free. But politicians hungry for new revenue want to put a sales tax on basic services. Sales taxes are already too high, and they hit hardest for those who can least afford to pay: low-and-middle-income Missourians, senior citizens on fixed incomes and the disabled. New sales taxes on services have been proposed in the last seven sessions of the Missouri General Assembly. Just this year, Missouri’s neighboring states of Oklahoma and Illinois have discussed taxing services. Other states, such as North Carolina and Washington State, have started imposing new sales taxes on services this year. The threat is real because politicians often share bad ideas, and a sales tax on services is a bad idea for Missouri consumers.”

The Question and Issues for Voters

Since very few services are currently taxed in Missouri, there would be no immediate impact on tax revenue. However, the question becomes what could the future impact be on state and local finances? Most sales tax laws were created at a time when transactions in goods dominated the economy. In the 20’s and 30’s, services accounted for roughly 50% of GDP. As of 2015, services accounted for nearly 80% of the US GDP. The increasing importance of service transactions to our economy has had a significant impact on sales tax revenue, as many states, like Missouri, continue to tax all goods but only certain services. Some states, such as South Dakota, have enacted rules which tax all transactions, including services. Others, like North Carolina, have passed legislation that has expanded their tax base to include more services, essentially “broadening the tax base”. But many states, like Missouri, continue to tax very few services. This Missouri ballot initiative would add a constitutional prohibition to applying sales tax to any services not taxed as of January 1, 2015. The question that Missouri voters must consider: Is it wise to add a constitutional measure that will severely limit the state’s ability to adapt its tax policy to changing economic trends? As the current law is written, adding new services to the tax base requires that a new bill be proposed, debated, enacted by the legislature, and then signed by the Governor. Essentially, voters need to decide whether this current process sufficient to ensure taxation of services is cautiously reviewed prior to being enacted, or do they prefer to outright prohibit the Government from tapping this potential stream of revenue without passing another constitutional amendment? Of course, taxing services are not the only way to expand the tax base. Even if this avenue is blocked, the legislature may still be free to raise rates on goods that are currently taxed or they can eliminate or restrict existing product or purchaser/use based exemptions. Missouri has a host of exemptions and special tax rules in their existing tax law, including exemptions for manufacturers, non-profit organizations, medical supplies, and reduced tax rates on food. What would be the impact on these rules if Amendment 4 were adopted? Those answers can’t be known right now but the question should at least be considered by the voting public before they cast their ballot. A poll taken in early October showed 49% opposed the proposal, 23% were in favor; and 27% remained undecided. Will this amendment pass? We will all be watching on November 8 to see how this interesting approach to tax policy shakes out.

Take Action

  • Learn more about how Sovos automated solutions can keep your business in compliance with complex tax reporting requirements.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Matt Walsh

Matt Walsh is the Principal of Indirect Tax. Matt and his department ensure all Sovos tax and reporting solutions are compliant with global indirect tax laws. He also provides strategic direction, guidance and recommendations for product enhancements and development. Matt is focused on fostering and managing government and industry relationships and has over 17 years of experience in compliance, including starting as a tax counsel in the tax department and then advancing from Manager to Director of Tax Research and from there to Senior Director of Tax to his present position. Prior to his time at Sovos, Matt was a Team Manager at John Hancock Financial Services. He is currently a member of the Technical Advisory Group of the OECD (Working Party #9), which drafts model legislation and implementation guidelines for the taxation of cross-border services. Matt has a B.S. in Business Administration from the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts (formerly North Adams State College) and a J.D. from the New England School of Law.
Share this post

Hungary Supplemental Insurance Premium Tax
EMEA IPT
July 11, 2022
Extra Profit Tax: An Introduction to Supplemental IPT in Hungary

This blog was last updated on October 28, 2024 Update 7 October 2024 by Edit Buliczka Hungarian Tax Office Updates IPT Declaration Form for 2023 The procedure necessary to correct an underdeclared premium figure in Hungary can be complicated. The complexity of a correction for return form 2320 has become even more challenging. Following a […]

2025 bond project
North America Tax Information Reporting
November 4, 2024
The Insurer’s Guide to the 2025 Bond Project

This blog was last updated on November 4, 2024 The regulatory landscape for insurance companies is undergoing significant changes with the Principles-Based Bond Project which is set to take effect on January 1, 2025. These changes, driven by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), will impact how insurance companies classify and value bond investments, […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 1, 2024
New ViDA Proposal Set for ECOFIN Approval

This blog was last updated on November 1, 2024 The Council of the European Union has released a new proposal regarding the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) reform. The proposal aims to modernise and streamline VAT systems across the EU, notably e-invoicing and Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC). Members States will review it on 5 […]

what is peppol
E-Invoicing Compliance North America
October 29, 2024
What it is PEPPOL?

This blog was last updated on October 29, 2024 Peppol E-invoicing explained: What it is and how it works The global adoption of electronic invoicing is accelerating. Governments worldwide are pushing to adopt e-invoicing to digitally transform their national systems and, often, to close the VAT gap. While many countries have introduced their own e-invoicing […]

remote sellers sales tax
North America Sales & Use Tax
October 28, 2024
Will Congress Act to Simplify Remote Seller Sales Tax Collection

This blog was last updated on October 29, 2024 When the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2018, that South Dakota’s law imposing sales tax collection requirements on sellers without in-state physical presence was constitutional, it did not grant states free reign. States are still responsible for ensuring that their sales tax requirements are manageable, […]

dtc shipping laws for craft spirits
North America ShipCompliant
October 23, 2024
Why It’s Time to Reform DtC Shipping Laws for Craft Spirits

This blog was last updated on October 23, 2024 While wine lovers have enjoyed the convenience of direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping for nearly two decades, the craft spirits market is still not afforded the same access. Outdated and restrictive spirits shipping laws have kept the spirits industry from fully leveraging the benefits of DtC shipping, leaving […]