Missouri Voters to Decide on a Constitutional Ban on Taxing Services

Matt Walsh
November 4, 2016

Voters in Missouri are to decide on a Constitutional amendment restricting sales taxes on services.

Synopsis:

Missouri is voting on a constitutional amendment that could severely impact sales tax policy for generations.

The Election

This election season we are electing a new president, seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate are up for grabs; not to mention all the state and local level elected offices that will be decided in November. While they might not garner as much attention as the presidential race, there are a number of important ballot referendums and voter decided questions across the country which will significantly impact our day-to-day lives. A measure up for vote in Missouri offers an interesting approach to controlling sales and use tax law. Amendment 4, also called the Taxpayer Protection Amendment, is a voter referendum that would change the state constitution by adding a prohibition against charging sales or use tax on services provided in the state.

The Ballot Question

The question is presented on the ballot as follows:

  • Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to prohibit a new state or local sales/use or other similar tax on any service or transaction that was not subject to a sales/use or similar tax as of January 1, 2015?
  • Potential costs to state and local governmental entities are unknown, but could be significant.  The proposal’s passage would impact governmental entity’s ability to revise their tax structures.  State and local governments expect no savings from this proposal.

Fair Ballot Language:

  • YES: A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to prohibit a new state or local sales/use or other similar tax on any service or transaction. This amendment only applies to any service or transaction that was not subject to a sales/use or similar tax as of January 1, 2015
  • NO: A “no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution to prohibit such state or local sales/use or other similar tax.

Currently, Missouri law states that sales tax is properly charged on the sale of all tangible personal property and to certain specifically listed services (RSMo Sec. 144.021). The list of services currently subject to tax is limited to admissions to events and amusement parks, electricity and other utilities, and telecommunication services (RSMo Sec. 144.021).

Potential costs to state and local governmental entities are unknown, but could be significant.  The proposal’s passage would impact governmental entity’s ability to revise their tax structures.  State and local governments expect no savings from this proposal.

The Argument in Support

Those in favor of the measure argue that: “Missourians rely on all sorts of basic services every day. Haircuts, manicures, shoe repairs; the services of a family doctor, a lawyer or accountant; the lease on a family’s home. Those services are now tax-free. But politicians hungry for new revenue want to put a sales tax on basic services. Sales taxes are already too high, and they hit hardest for those who can least afford to pay: low-and-middle-income Missourians, senior citizens on fixed incomes and the disabled. New sales taxes on services have been proposed in the last seven sessions of the Missouri General Assembly. Just this year, Missouri’s neighboring states of Oklahoma and Illinois have discussed taxing services. Other states, such as North Carolina and Washington State, have started imposing new sales taxes on services this year. The threat is real because politicians often share bad ideas, and a sales tax on services is a bad idea for Missouri consumers.”

The Question and Issues for Voters

Since very few services are currently taxed in Missouri, there would be no immediate impact on tax revenue. However, the question becomes what could the future impact be on state and local finances? Most sales tax laws were created at a time when transactions in goods dominated the economy. In the 20’s and 30’s, services accounted for roughly 50% of GDP. As of 2015, services accounted for nearly 80% of the US GDP. The increasing importance of service transactions to our economy has had a significant impact on sales tax revenue, as many states, like Missouri, continue to tax all goods but only certain services. Some states, such as South Dakota, have enacted rules which tax all transactions, including services. Others, like North Carolina, have passed legislation that has expanded their tax base to include more services, essentially “broadening the tax base”. But many states, like Missouri, continue to tax very few services. This Missouri ballot initiative would add a constitutional prohibition to applying sales tax to any services not taxed as of January 1, 2015. The question that Missouri voters must consider: Is it wise to add a constitutional measure that will severely limit the state’s ability to adapt its tax policy to changing economic trends? As the current law is written, adding new services to the tax base requires that a new bill be proposed, debated, enacted by the legislature, and then signed by the Governor. Essentially, voters need to decide whether this current process sufficient to ensure taxation of services is cautiously reviewed prior to being enacted, or do they prefer to outright prohibit the Government from tapping this potential stream of revenue without passing another constitutional amendment? Of course, taxing services are not the only way to expand the tax base. Even if this avenue is blocked, the legislature may still be free to raise rates on goods that are currently taxed or they can eliminate or restrict existing product or purchaser/use based exemptions. Missouri has a host of exemptions and special tax rules in their existing tax law, including exemptions for manufacturers, non-profit organizations, medical supplies, and reduced tax rates on food. What would be the impact on these rules if Amendment 4 were adopted? Those answers can’t be known right now but the question should at least be considered by the voting public before they cast their ballot. A poll taken in early October showed 49% opposed the proposal, 23% were in favor; and 27% remained undecided. Will this amendment pass? We will all be watching on November 8 to see how this interesting approach to tax policy shakes out.

Take Action

  • Learn more about how Sovos automated solutions can keep your business in compliance with complex tax reporting requirements.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Matt Walsh

Matt Walsh is the Principal of Indirect Tax. Matt and his department ensure all Sovos tax and reporting solutions are compliant with global indirect tax laws. He also provides strategic direction, guidance and recommendations for product enhancements and development. Matt is focused on fostering and managing government and industry relationships and has over 17 years of experience in compliance, including starting as a tax counsel in the tax department and then advancing from Manager to Director of Tax Research and from there to Senior Director of Tax to his present position. Prior to his time at Sovos, Matt was a Team Manager at John Hancock Financial Services. He is currently a member of the Technical Advisory Group of the OECD (Working Party #9), which drafts model legislation and implementation guidelines for the taxation of cross-border services. Matt has a B.S. in Business Administration from the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts (formerly North Adams State College) and a J.D. from the New England School of Law.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]