Illinois Sourcing Changes Due to Hartney Decision

kristinkorpostax
March 19, 2014

This blog was last updated on June 27, 2021

Banner - for Chicago IL Blog IIllinois, as well as Chicago, generally follows origin based sourcing. Illinois Dept. of Rev. General Information Letter ST 00-0020-GIL, 01/26/2000. Until the recent Illinois Supreme Court Hartney decision, which we will discuss below, Illinois law provided that a sale is sourced to the seller’s place of business that:

  • Makes a complete and unconditional offer to sell, which is accepted without modification by the buyer so as to create a contract;
  • Receives an offer or counteroffer to buy (regardless of where the seller accepts the offer or counteroffer);
  • Accepts an offer or counteroffer to buy; or
  • Makes final delivery of the property in Illinois to the buyer. Final delivery of the property in Illinois does not include the delivery of property by the seller outside Illinois to an independent carrier for transportation directly to the buyer.

Ill. Admin. Code 86  § 130.610(b). Taxware’s Sales and Use Tax System utilizes a hierarchical approach to source Illinois local sales to the seller’s business location, as outlined above. Taxware defines the place where the seller makes an offer as the Point of Order Acceptance. Next, Taxware defines the receipt or acceptance of an offer or counter offer as the location where the order is Shipped From. Lastly, Taxware considers the place of final delivery to equate to the Ship To location. On November 21, 2013, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Hartney Fuel Company vs. Hamer, in which the court concluded that a seller incurs retailers’ occupation taxes in the local jurisdiction where its predominant selling activities occur, even if it also engages in very limited activities in other places. On January 22, 2014, the Illinois Department of Revenue filed emergency regulations to provide additional guidance to taxpayers, to reflect the decisions set forth in the Hartney case. The point of order acceptance should no longer be the sole factor in determining the situs for a sale. In order to determine where a sale is ultimately taking place, one should also consider the following “primary” factors, in addition to point of order acceptance:

  • Do the location house company executives who have the authority to negotiate on behalf of the company and finalize sales transactions?
  • Is this the location where the offers are prepared and made?
  • Is this location where purchase orders are accepted or other contracting actions that bind the seller to the sale are completed?
  • Is the inventory of the goods to be sold housed in this location?

Additional information regarding the Hartney decisions, as well as all emergency and proposed regulations can be found on the Illinois Department of Revenue website at the following link: http://www.revenue.state.il.us/News/HartneyDecision.htm. While the Hartney decision will not have an impact on Taxware’s Sales and Use Tax System processing rules, sellers will need to apply a greater fact intensive test to their transactions to determine where their definition of the “Point of Order Acceptance” should essentially be located based on these new regulations issued under the Hartney decision. Note that the emergency regulations are effective immediately.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

kristinkorpostax

Share this post

alcohol deliveries
North America ShipCompliant
December 20, 2024
What if No One is Home to Sign for an Alcohol Delivery?

This blog was last updated on December 20, 2024 When no one is home to sign for an alcohol delivery, it becomes more than just a minor hiccup for direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers. It’s a domino effect that transforms a perfectly curated product into a customer’s disappointment before it’s ever opened. This becomes an even […]

taxation of motor insurance policies france
North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 18, 2024
Taxation of Motor Insurance Policies: France

This blog was last updated on December 18, 2024 France is one of the most challenging countries in Europe when it comes to the premium tax treatment of motor insurance policies. This is mainly due to the variety of taxes and charges that can apply and the differing treatment of different vehicle types. This blog […]

california bottle bill compliance
North America ShipCompliant
December 13, 2024
California Bottle Bill: Compliance Updates for Wine and Spirits

This blog was last updated on December 16, 2024 California’s bottle bill got a major upgrade earlier this year, and it’s changed the rules for wineries, distilleries and beverage distributors in a big way. For the first time, wine and spirits manufacturers will need to register with CalRecycle, report sales and pay California Redemption Value […]

unclaimed property compliance for wineries
North America ShipCompliant
December 12, 2024
Unclaimed Property Compliance: What Wineries and Wine Clubs Need to Know

This blog was last updated on December 12, 2024 Although hard to believe, unclaimed property obligations impact ALL industries, including wineries and other wine clubs. While most companies typically only associate unclaimed property with outstanding checks, including accounts payable and payroll, there are other exposures for wineries and wine clubs to consider. Understanding these risks […]

retail delivery fees for alcohol shipping
North America ShipCompliant
December 5, 2024
Navigating Retail Delivery Fees: A Guide for DtC Alcohol Sellers

This blog was last updated on December 5, 2024 Direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers are no strangers to navigating a complex regulatory landscape. However, recently, a new challenge has emerged—the rise of retail delivery fees. From excise taxes to shipping restrictions, the industry has long dealt with a maze of state-specific rules that require careful attention […]