Illinois Sourcing Changes Due to Hartney Decision

kristinkorpostax
March 19, 2014

Banner - for Chicago IL Blog IIllinois, as well as Chicago, generally follows origin based sourcing. Illinois Dept. of Rev. General Information Letter ST 00-0020-GIL, 01/26/2000. Until the recent Illinois Supreme Court Hartney decision, which we will discuss below, Illinois law provided that a sale is sourced to the seller’s place of business that:

  • Makes a complete and unconditional offer to sell, which is accepted without modification by the buyer so as to create a contract;
  • Receives an offer or counteroffer to buy (regardless of where the seller accepts the offer or counteroffer);
  • Accepts an offer or counteroffer to buy; or
  • Makes final delivery of the property in Illinois to the buyer. Final delivery of the property in Illinois does not include the delivery of property by the seller outside Illinois to an independent carrier for transportation directly to the buyer.

Ill. Admin. Code 86  § 130.610(b). Taxware’s Sales and Use Tax System utilizes a hierarchical approach to source Illinois local sales to the seller’s business location, as outlined above. Taxware defines the place where the seller makes an offer as the Point of Order Acceptance. Next, Taxware defines the receipt or acceptance of an offer or counter offer as the location where the order is Shipped From. Lastly, Taxware considers the place of final delivery to equate to the Ship To location. On November 21, 2013, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Hartney Fuel Company vs. Hamer, in which the court concluded that a seller incurs retailers’ occupation taxes in the local jurisdiction where its predominant selling activities occur, even if it also engages in very limited activities in other places. On January 22, 2014, the Illinois Department of Revenue filed emergency regulations to provide additional guidance to taxpayers, to reflect the decisions set forth in the Hartney case. The point of order acceptance should no longer be the sole factor in determining the situs for a sale. In order to determine where a sale is ultimately taking place, one should also consider the following “primary” factors, in addition to point of order acceptance:

  • Do the location house company executives who have the authority to negotiate on behalf of the company and finalize sales transactions?
  • Is this the location where the offers are prepared and made?
  • Is this location where purchase orders are accepted or other contracting actions that bind the seller to the sale are completed?
  • Is the inventory of the goods to be sold housed in this location?

Additional information regarding the Hartney decisions, as well as all emergency and proposed regulations can be found on the Illinois Department of Revenue website at the following link: http://www.revenue.state.il.us/News/HartneyDecision.htm. While the Hartney decision will not have an impact on Taxware’s Sales and Use Tax System processing rules, sellers will need to apply a greater fact intensive test to their transactions to determine where their definition of the “Point of Order Acceptance” should essentially be located based on these new regulations issued under the Hartney decision. Note that the emergency regulations are effective immediately.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

kristinkorpostax

Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]