The Future of ACA in the Wake of the Election

Jeff Cronin
November 11, 2016

Tuesday’s presidential election spurred hyperbolic talk about potential implications to Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation, leaving businesses wondering if they would still need to comply with this legislation and what it may look like going forward. First, it is important to remember that ACA is still in effect and will continue to be in effect for tax year 2016. The new Congress and President will not be in office until the third week of January, which is too late to impact business obligations for this tax year. In addition, even though the Republican Party will now hold the Presidency and majorities in both Houses of Congress, the Republican Party does not have a strong enough majority in the Senate to stop a filibuster. It is likely that a full repeal of ACA will be blocked procedurally in the Senate. Modifications to ACA are likely, which would have been the case under either a Trump or Clinton Presidency, as both candidates stated a desire to “fix” ACA. As with all pieces of business-to-government compliance legislation, changes to ACA will be tracked and managed by our Compliance Research Team, and Sovos ACA will be updated to ensure our clients stay compliant. We are here to support our clients in complying with ACA, including any and all modifications that result from the election.

Take Action

Want to learn more about how the election might impact your ACA reporting? Register for our webinar and software demo to learn how to implement the changes you need to know. Sign up for one of our next sessions:

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Jeff Cronin

Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]