Funding Wireless E9-1-1 in the U.S. through Fees

Erik Wallin
April 14, 2015

Funding Wireless Enhanced 9-1-1 in the U.S. through Fees

Today it is a fact of life in the U.S. that most adults (and many children) own and carry wireless phones. Based on industry surveys, 4 out of 10 adults and roughly 45% of American children live in wireless-only households. With this in mind, it is important to know that as wireless technology has improved so too have some vital government services.

Some of the most important government services available to the public involve the provision of emergency assistance. Emergency services generally include three main functions:

1) Police (safety/crime prevention);

2) Fire (fire/rescue); and

3) Emergency medical services (ambulatory).

Depending on how local governments organize such services, these functions are at times carried out by a single organization or at other times by separate entities. Americans know that the easiest way to contact any of these important government functions is as simple as pressing three buttons on any available phone, “9-1-1.” Today, most 9-1-1 systems not only connect you to emergency services but also automatically report the telephone number and location of the calls made from wireline phones, a capability called Enhanced 9-1-1, or E9-1-1.

Revenue to Pay for Enhanced 9-1-1 Services Often Comes From Fees

While most 9-1-1 systems carry enhanced 9-1-1 features, not all states and localities make these features available for wireless customers.  Rather, these features are only available for wireless customers in those states that are able to properly fund them. The necessary revenue to pay for this feature often comes from fees. For individuals with wireless subscription services enhanced 9-1-1 fees are often included as a line item on your monthly bill. However, for those of you that may purchase pre-paid wireless services, the fee is generally collected at the point of sale.

Today, 35 of 50 states collect wireless E9-1-1 fees on point of sale transactions involving pre-paid wireless services, and the list of states imposing such fees is constantly growing. These fees general fall into two categories:

1) Rate based fees (i.e. fees based on a % of the sales price); or

2) Dollar based fees (i.e. a flat fee applied on each transaction).

As more and more states impose E-9-1-1 fees to fund enhances services, there seems to be a somewhat even divide between those states which impose dollar based fees and those which impose rate based fees.

E9-1-1 fees based on a percentage of the sales price

The following states currently impose E9-1-1 fees based on a percentage of the sales price of pre-paid wireless services: AZ; CO; DC; ID; IL (Chicago has its own separate percentage based fee); KS; LA; MI; ND; NE; OH; RI; SD; TX; UT.

E9-1-1 fees using a flat dollar amount

The following states currently impose E9-1-1 fees using a flat dollar amount: AL; AR; CT; DE; FL;GA; IA; IN; MD; ME; MN (E-9-1-1 + TAM); MS; NC OK; PA; SC; TN; VA; WA (split between county & state); WI.

New states are adopting E9-1-1 fees every year. Additionally in those states where such fees currently exist, the rates and dollar amounts imposed change fairly frequently depending on a state’s particular funding need.  Sovos Compliance is committed to tracking and maintaining these rules in both Taxware Enterprise and our Sales and Use Tax System so our clients can be assured accurate results when conducting transactions involving pre-paid wireless services.  

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Erik Wallin

Erik Wallin is a Senior Tax Counsel on the Tax Research Team at Sovos Compliance. Erik has been with Sovos Compliance since 2011, and his main areas of focus are on U.S. Transaction Tax Law which includes special expertise in the taxation of technology and the taxation mechanisms that apply throughout the Colorado home rule jurisdictions. Erik is a member of the Massachusetts Bar, has a B.A. from York College of Pennsylvania, a J.D. from New England School of Law, and an LL.M. in Taxation from Boston University.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]