CPA trade groups pen letter to Congress about net investment income tax

Sovos
August 15, 2014

Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the net investment income tax (NIIT) was enacted under section 1411 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Virgin Islands Society of Certified Public Accountants (VISCPA) and the Guam Society of Certified Public Accountants (GSCPA) wrote to Congress to inquire whether the NIIT applied to bona fide residents of the Virgin Islands, Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

The letter was sent Aug. 7. It notes that there is some confusion between what the NIIT regulations appear to state and what local tax authorities in Guam and the Virgin Islands have said on the matter.

“The wording of proposed and final [IRS] regulations regarding NIIT appears to exempt from the NIIT bona fide residents of the U.S. Territories; however, the VIBIR [Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue] has issued a statement and the GDRT [Guam Department of Revenue and Taxation] Deputy Tax Commissioner has stated that the NIIT applies to bona fide residents of the U.S. Territories, causing much confusion among taxpayers and practitioners,” the letter read. “Clarity on the applicability of the NIIT to bona fide residents of the U.S. Territories is needed.”

The mirror code and NIIT regulations
Under what is known as the mirror code, all tax information reporting responsibilities outlined in the IRC apply to certain U.S. territories, including the three in question. However, territories following the mirror code have no income tax obligation to the IRS because they report tax information to their tax authorities. As such, it would appear that the NIIT regulations, which impose a 3.8 percent excise tax for net investment income of certain trusts, estates and individuals, would not be applicable for the three territories, according to the letter.

Furthermore, the letter asserted that certain provisions of the ACA, which fund sections of the health care law, were not to apply to bona fide residents of the territories because they cannot realize the benefits of the ACA. Based on the confusion, the three CPA groups had the following recommendation for providing more clarity for tax compliance professionals and taxpayers:

“Treasury should provide clarity to bona fide residents of mirror code U.S. Territories as to when and how the NIIT applies,” the letter said. “If bona fide residents of mirror code U.S. Territories are exempt from the NIIT, we additionally request clarification as to whether or not U.S. Territory estates and trusts are exempt from the NIIT as well.” 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sovos

Sovos is a global provider of tax, compliance and trust solutions and services that enable businesses to navigate an increasingly regulated world with true confidence. Purpose-built for always-on compliance capabilities, our scalable IT-driven solutions meet the demands of an evolving and complex global regulatory landscape. Sovos’ cloud-based software platform provides an unparalleled level of integration with business applications and government compliance processes. More than 100,000 customers in 100+ countries – including half the Fortune 500 – trust Sovos for their compliance needs. Sovos annually processes more than three billion transactions across 19,000 global tax jurisdictions. Bolstered by a robust partner program more than 400 strong, Sovos brings to bear an unrivaled global network for companies across industries and geographies. Founded in 1979, Sovos has operations across the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]