Congress Mulling Altering Thresholds for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-K

Adam Rivera
October 20, 2017

This blog was last updated on March 11, 2019

In both the House and Senate, Congress is looking to change the thresholds for Form 1099-MISC and Form 1099-K reporting.

Form 1099-MISC, which is used to report miscellaneous income, currently has a general threshold of $600 with some exceptions (e.g. royalties of $10 or more, or direct sales of at least $5,000 of consumer products to a buyer for resale anywhere other than a permanent retail establishment). This $600 threshold has been in place since 1954.

Form 1099-K, which is used to report Payment Card and Third Party Network Transactions, currently has a threshold for third party network transactions that requires reporting only when gross payments exceed $20,000 and when there are more than 200 transactions. This high threshold creates a “gap” where many people who meet either requirement do not have to file because they do not meet both requirements.While this “gap “exists for third party network transactions, it should be noted that there are currently no limiting thresholds for payment card transactions.

The two bills that are seeking to change the thresholds for these forms are Senate Bill 1549, otherwise referred to as the “NEW GIG Act of 2017,” and House Bill 3717, otherwise referred to as the “Small Business Owners’ Tax Simplification Act of 2017.”

The NEW Gig Act of 2017 would raise the reporting threshold for Form 1099-MISC from $600 to $1000, and it would lower the reporting threshold for Form 1099-K from $20,000 to $1,000. The bill was introduced on the Senate floor in July and is currently in the Senate Finance Committee.

The Small Business Owners’ Tax Simplification Act of 2017 would raise the reporting threshold for Form 1099-MISC from $600 to $1500. Additionally, it would lower the reporting threshold for Form 1099-K from $20,000 to $1500 and remove the transaction threshold reporting requirement. Unlike the NEW GIG Act, the House Bill has bipartisan support as it has cosponsors from both sides of the aisle as four Republican cosponsors and two Democrats are cosponsoring the bill. This bill was introduced on the House floor in September and is currently in the House Ways and Means committee.

The impact of the lower 1099-K threshold would be significant as it would create new reporting responsibilities that would not have existed previously and have a big effect on ride-sharing companies as their drivers are not paid directly. Instead, these companies are considered third party networks, meaning that they facilitate the driver’s ride-sharing business by finding the driver passengers and transferring payment between the passengers and drivers. Furthermore, online sellers who use virtual marketplaces and accept payments via online payment processors, which are also considered a third party network, would be affected by the lowered 1099-K threshold as well.

While the 1099-MISC threshold change would not be as dramatic as the 1099-K threshold change, it could still have a big effect for a lot of companies that use independent contractors for smaller one-off projects or situations. With the higher threshold these companies may not have to report as many independent contractors as they had before.

Given the potentially large impact that these threshold changes could have for information reporting requirements, it’s certainly important to keep track of this pending legislation.

Senate Bill 1549 
House Bill 3717

 

Take Action

Find out how Sovos enables organizations to successfully automate 1099 reporting.

Get in touch to learn more about regulatory updates on Sovos Compass.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Adam Rivera

Adam Rivera is a member of the Regulatory Analysis Team’s Direct Tax division at Sovos. His main areas of focus are Federal and State Tax Withholding and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Reporting. Prior to Sovos, Adam worked as a legislative aide in the Florida House of Representatives. He also has experience in securities law, focusing on securities litigation and researching emerging crowdfunding methods of raising capital. Adam is a member of both the Massachusetts and Florida Bars. He earned his B.A. from the University of Florida and his J.D. from the University of Miami.
Share this post

dtc shipping law updates
North America ShipCompliant
March 12, 2025
The Case for DtC Beer Shipping Reform: Key Takeaways from the 2025 Report

This blog was last updated on March 12, 2025 Craft beer drinkers want more choices. Brewers want more opportunities. And yet, legal barriers still stand in the way of direct-to-cconsumer (DtC) beer shipping. The 2025 Direct-to-Consumer Beer Shipping Report, produced by Sovos ShipCompliant in partnership with the Brewers Association, reveals how consumer demand, regulatory restrictions […]

DtC wine market
North America ShipCompliant
March 7, 2025
From Decline to Opportunity: Lessons from the 2024 DtC Market

This blog was last updated on March 7, 2025 The 2025 Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report offers more than just data—it provides valuable insights into the trends shaping the industry and the factors driving change. To delve deeper into these findings, industry experts Andrew Adams from WineBusiness Analytics and Alex Koral from Sovos ShipCompliant joined forces […]