Disposable Bag Fees Are Adding Up Across the US

Steven Claflin
June 1, 2016

Jurisdictions all across the country have instituted disposable carryout bag fees and bans. San Francisco passed its ban on single-use bags back in 2007, and greatly expanded the ordinance in 2012 to include all retail stores. The District of Columbia has a bag fee that dates back to January 1, 2010, entitled the “Anacostia River Clean Up and Protection Act.” In just the past few months, a number of cities have imposed new bag fees that became effective, including:

Mammoth Lakes, CA (March 1st)
Yountville, CA (March 31st)
Hermosa Beach, CA  (April 1st)
Cambridge, MA (March 31st)
South Portland, ME (March 1st)
Falmouth, ME (April 1st)
Kirkland, WA (March 1st)

  There are many variations of these bans and fees. Some of the more recent iterations of such laws include the following:

Cambridge, Massachusetts Bag Fees and Ban

Effective March 31, 2016, Cambridge, Massachusetts has banned the use of traditional plastic shopping bags and now requires retailers to charge a fee of $0.10 per bag for paper and compostable plastic bags distributed at the point of sale. This fee is also subject to sales and use tax. For more information see Cambridge Ordinance Number 1366, the “Bring Your Own Bag” ordinance. One of the interesting aspects of this bag fee is that it applies to restaurants. While there are several other fees in jurisdictions that also apply to restaurants (including, for example, San Francisco, CA and the District of Columbia), it is far more common to exclude restaurants from the fee requirements. Because of this, Massachusetts published TIR 16-5, which discusses how state sales and meals taxes apply to this fee. Per TIR 16-5, “when checkout bags are sold by a retail establishment to customers under the Ordinance, they are subject to state sales tax, including the sales tax on meals.” The guidance allows restaurants to either separate the fees collected for the bags and include those fee on a separate sales tax return, or include the fees on their meals tax return. In the former situation, the restaurant does not need to collect meals tax; in the latter they must collect meals tax.

New York City, New York’s New Bag Fee

After trying for a number of years, New York City just recently passed a bag fee that becomes effective October 1, 2016. This is one of the biggest jurisdictions to impose such a fee. The law requires retailers to charge at least $0.05 on all carryout bags, and these fees are retained by the stores. Unlike in Cambridge, this fee does not apply to restaurants or food service establishments located outside of grocery stores. However, the fee is not imposed on bags used to carry items purchased by a person using the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Also included in the law is a “Bag Fee Holiday” of sorts. Stores do not need to charge the fee on reusable carryout bags annually from April 17 to April 30. For more information see Int. No. 209-A, “Plastic Bag Bill – Reducing the use of carryout bags.” As jurisdictions impose these types of fees that affect sales and use tax, Sovos stays on top of the issue and adjusts our solutions accordingly so you can remain compliant. To learn more about how to improve your sales tax determination and filing accuracy, contact us today.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Steven Claflin

Steven Claflin is a Regulatory Counsel at Sovos. Within Sovos’ Regulatory Analysis function, Steve’s main focus is legal research on indirect taxes in the United States. He received a B.S. from Bridgewater State University and J.D. magna cum laude from University of New Hampshire School of Law. He is a member of both the Massachusetts and New Hampshire Bars.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]