How Louisiana Sales Tax Continues to Evolve

Andrew Decker
May 12, 2023

Despite Louisiana’s struggles to adopt meaningful sales tax simplifications, it implemented the Sales and Use Tax Commission for Remote Sellers, creating a single spot for state and local sales tax filing. Unfortunately, this system does not address the complexities of local sales tax rules.

Prior to Wayfair, Louisiana allowed “volunteer” remote sellers to use their 8.45% combined Direct Marketers but opted not to offer the same simplification to remote sellers that have crossed the state’s primary economic nexus threshold. Please note, however, that this simplified rate is still available to sellers under the primary economic threshold.

Louisiana law requires that any remote seller who qualifies as a “dealer” collect and remit state and local (parish and city) sales taxes on their remote sales of goods and taxable services into Louisiana. Remote sellers qualify as dealers if their annual sales into Louisiana exceed $100,000 or if they make at least 200 separate sales into Louisiana. In determining whether these thresholds are met, remote sellers should exclude any sales made through an electronic marketplace so long as the marketplace is obligated to collect the sales tax in place of the seller. While the above referenced Commission for Remote Sellers simplifies the reporting and remittance process for such sellers the ability of parishes to set their own sales tax rates and sales tax exemptions means that the determination of how much tax to charge on a given sale can be challenging for out-of-state businesses.

Marketplace facilitators are required to collect and remit state and local sales tax on all remote sales that it transacts or facilitates into Louisiana. Marketplaces are also subject to the above threshold and should include both their own sales and any sales they facilitate when determining whether they meet the threshold.

A secondary economic threshold is used to determine whether an out-of-state seller qualifies as a “remote retailer.”  Any out-of-state business that has annual gross receipts in excess of $50,000 in Louisiana is required, per Louisiana Revised Statue 47:309.1, to issue use tax notices to their customers unless the remote retailer collects sales tax on their Louisiana sales. (As remote sellers with over $100,000 in sales are required to collect sales tax, they are relieved of the obligation to issue use tax notices). Additionally, remote retailers are subject to a requirement to furnish annual statements to the Department of Revenue regarding the value of sales to individual Louisiana purchasers.

Out-of-state sellers who are not required to collect sales tax may choose to voluntarily collect Louisiana tax. Such sellers can avail themselves of the “Direct Marketers” rate referenced above and avoid the complexities of local sales tax. This option is not available to any remote sellers who exceed the primary threshold of $100,000 annual sales.

Louisiana continues to take steps to simplify the collection of sales tax on remote sales, however, as long as local tax complexities remain out-of-state sellers will continue to struggle with their tax obligations.

Take Action

Still have questions about Louisiana sales tax? Connect with our experts for the answers.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Andrew Decker

Andrew Decker is a Senior Regulatroy Counsel at Sovos Compliance. Within Sovo’s Regulatory Analysis function, Andrew focuses on international VAT and GST issues and domestic sales tax issues. Andrew received a B.A. in Economics from Bates College and J.D. at Northeastern University School of Law. Andrew is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]