Ohio to Permit DtC Shipping for Larger-Scale Wineries

Alex Koral
July 2, 2021

As direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of alcohol has become an increasingly valuable market for suppliers and manufacturers over the last many years, regulatory restrictions in states have hampered the ability of certain parties to enjoy the same benefits. However, with the passage of HB 110 in Ohio, recently signed into law by Governor Mike DeWine, a key limitation on wine DtC shipping will soon go away.

Currently, Ohio will only issue a license for DtC shipping to wine manufacturers that produce less than 250,000 gallons of wine annually (and as we know, holding an active license is often a prerequisite for DtC shipping of alcoholic beverages). HB 110, though, contains a key provision establishing a new S-2 type DtC shipping license that will be available to wineries producing more than 250,000 gallons of wine per year. An S-2 type license will have an initial cost of $250, with an annual renewal fee of $100.

The changes in HB 110 are set to become effective on September 28, 2021.

This change will create a two-tier schema for DtC shipping of alcoholic beverages in Ohio, with smaller-scale wineries and beer manufacturers operating under the existing S-1 DtC shipping license, while larger-scale wineries will require a new S-2 type license. But the availability of this new license is very good news for the DtC wine shipping industry and Ohio consumers as many more wineries that were previously excluded from the Ohio market will soon be able to ship there.

Notably, the DtC compliance rules for S-1 permit holders are unchanged by HB 110, so wineries and breweries currently shipping DtC to Ohio consumers should not see any adjustments to their current regulations. Wineries that will soon ship under a S-2 license will also be required to abide by the established regulations on S-1 licensees, including making good faith efforts to verify the age of purchasers at the time of sale, selling only wines that they directly manufacture themselves, and collecting and remitting all applicable Ohio sales and excise taxes.

In addition to establishing the S-2 DtC shipping license for larger-scale wineries, HB 110 creates new provisions for fulfillment houses servicing shipments to the state. These new provisions echo similar new rules established recently in Tennessee and Kansas. Under these provisions, fulfillment houses are required to register with Ohio prior to fulfilling shipments of alcohol and must file an annual report of the shipments they serviced. Type S-2 licensees using fulfillment houses will be required to only use those fulfillment houses that abide by Ohio’s new regulations.

HB 110 also makes clear that the S-1 and S-2 type DtC shipping licenses are only available to wine or beer manufacturers, and not to businesses licensed as retailers in Ohio or other states. This provision is notable in light of action by Ohio over the last couple of years, under the 21st Amendment Enforcement Act, to crack down on apparent shipments by unlicensed businesses.

The change to Ohio’s DtC wine shipping laws to allow larger-scale wineries to join the market has been a long time coming, and reflects the ongoing efforts by groups such as Free the Grapes! and Wine Institute to effect positive change for the DtC shipping market. A similar restriction in New Jersey, restricting wineries that produce more than 250,000 gallons of wine annually from DtC shipping there, is also targeted for change. We all certainly hope that New Jersey will soon follow the lead of Ohio and remove this barrier on New Jersey residents’ ability to fully enjoy the benefits of an open, though regulated, DtC wine shipping market.

Take Action

Find out how ShipCompliant Direct can help with your DtC compliance processes, from license management to real-time compliance checks and tax determination and reporting.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Koral

Alex Koral is Senior Regulatory Counsel for Sovos ShipCompliant in the company’s Boulder, Colorado office. He actively researches beverage alcohol regulations and market developments to inform development of Sovos’ ShipCompliant product and help educate the industry on compliance issues. Alex has been in the beverage alcohol arena since 2015, after receiving his J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]