New Alaska DtC Rules Set to Take Effect

Alex Koral
August 21, 2024

This blog was last updated on August 21, 2024

A new regulatory framework for direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of beverage alcohol in Alaska is set to take effect on Friday, August 23, 2024.  

These new rules govern how in-state and out-of-state producers can ship their products to consumers in Alaska following the passage of SB 9 in 2023, an omnibus bill that affected almost every part of the state’s beverage alcohol industry. By setting down clear and manageable requirements for wineries, breweries and distilleries to follow, the Alaska Alcohol and Marijuana Control Office (AMCO) has brought some welcome stability to the state’s DtC channel, which had previously operated under limited regulatory management. 

Under the new rules adopted by AMCO, producers who want to ship their products to Alaska consumers will need to comply with the following requirements: 

  • Apply for and hold a Manufacturer Direct Shipment License, issued by the Alaska AMCO. 
  • This license will cost $200 and will be effective for two years. 
  • This license is only available to licensed manufacturers that hold production licenses issued by the TTB (Tax and Trade Bureau) and their home state. 
  • This license will only be eligible for breweries that produce less than 300,000 barrels of beer per year, or distilleries that produce less than 50,000 proof gallons of distilled spirits per year. There are no production caps for wine producers. 
  • Pay Alaska state excise tax on all shipments to the state. 
  • Limit shipments to any individual purchaser to: 
  • No more than 1.5 liters of distilled spirits per transaction and no more than 4.5 liters of distilled spirits total in a calendar year; 
  • No more than 18 liters of wine per transaction, and no more than 108 liters of wine total in a calendar year; 
  • No more than 288 ounces of brewed beverages per transaction and no more than 13.5 gallons of brewed beverages total in a calendar year. 
  • Only use common carriers that have been approved by the AMCO. 
  • Not ship to any address in a zip code identified by the AMCO as having adopted a local option rule prohibiting the sale of alcohol. 
  • Verify at the time of purchase that the purchaser and recipient (if different) of the order are at least 21 years old using either a physical copy of their state-issued ID or an online verification service. 
  • Provide written or electronic information on the dangers of fetal alcohol syndrome at the time of purchase to the purchaser and recipient (if different). 
  • Properly label all packages as containing beverage alcohol and require an adult signature upon delivery. 
  • Retain records for two years on all shipments and make those records available to AMCO upon request. 

Notably, Alaska does not have a state-level sales tax, so assuming liability for sales tax is not a requirement for getting an Alaska DtC license. However, the state does allow communities in the state to establish and assess their own sales taxes, and shippers that have economic nexus in Alaska (make over $100,000 in annual gross sales to the state) will need to register with the state’s Remote Seller’s Sales Tax Commission to remit those local taxes. 

Further, the allowance for out-of-state retailers to ship DtC to Alaska residents has now been removed. 

DtC shippers who have been patiently waiting for final adoption of the new DtC shipping rules can now apply for licenses and begin to service their consumers in the Last Frontier. 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Koral

Alex Koral is Senior Regulatory Counsel for Sovos ShipCompliant in the company’s Boulder, Colorado office. He actively researches beverage alcohol regulations and market developments to inform development of Sovos’ ShipCompliant product and help educate the industry on compliance issues. Alex has been in the beverage alcohol arena since 2015, after receiving his J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

This blog was last updated on June 6, 2024 When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over […]

North America ShipCompliant
August 21, 2024
Craft Distillers Are Struggling; Why Not DtC?

This blog was last updated on August 21, 2024 As craft distillers work to grow their business and market presence, they must contend with innumerable challenges, not least of which is simply being able to access consumers across the country due to restrictive state laws. To help relieve these headwinds, industry groups along with consumer […]

North America ShipCompliant
August 21, 2024
New York Enacts DtC Shipping for Spirits and Ciders

Spirits, ciders and meads added to the list of products that are permitted to be shipped direct-to-consumer (DtC) in New York. 

North America Sales & Use Tax Tax Compliance
August 16, 2024
The Troubling Rise of the Retail Delivery Fee and its Impact on Sales Tax Compliance

Retail Delivery Fee impacts sales tax as fuel efficiency and electric vehicles reduce motor fuel tax revenue.

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
August 9, 2024
Slovenia Proposes Mandatory B2B E-Invoicing and CTC E-Reporting

This blog was last updated on August 12, 2024 The Government of the Republic of Slovenia has released a draft proposal to implement mandatory e-invoicing and e-reporting for B2B and B2C transactions. This implementation would mark a significant shift in the country’s e-invoicing landscape. Should the proposal be approved, taxpayers will be subject to a […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
August 5, 2024
A Modern Approach to Indirect Tax Automation

This blog was last updated on August 5, 2024 Global companies and those with global aspirations face a critical decision when evaluating their indirect tax compliance requirements and processes. Do they think globally or locally? Do they understand that indirect tax automation is not a luxury but an imperative? Do they view their automation decisions […]