Kansas Economic Nexus Has Uncertain Effect on DtC Wine Shippers

Alex Koral
May 12, 2021

This blog was last updated on February 29, 2024

Kansas became the latest state to adopt effective economic nexus rules after the state legislature overrode a Governor’s veto to pass SB 50. The new law becomes effective on July 1, 2021, to apply to sales made after that date.

Under the new economic nexus law, remote sellers will face sales tax liability on their sales to Kansas residents if they make over $100,000 in total annual gross revenue in the state. Kansas state sales tax rate is 6.5%, which can be supplemented by local rates depending on where sales are made to.

On its face, the new Kansas economic nexus law is more notable for the contentious and Byzantine route it took to pass (including an attempt last year, which the Attorney General determined was unenforceable and the veto by Governor Laura Kelly in April). However, for direct-to-consumer (DtC) shippers of wine, there are additional considerations that attenuate the overall impact of this new general sales tax law.

Notably, Kansas is one of the few states that does not condition DtC wine shippers to accept a sales tax burden in the state as a condition of getting a DtC shipping license. As such, a DtC wine shipper’s sales tax burden in the state would only exist depending on generally applicable rules, such as the new economic nexus law.

There is a very good reason that this provision was left out of Kansas’ DtC wine shipping laws: sales of alcohol in Kansas are not subject to Kansas sales tax. Instead, the state imposes what is called the Beverage Occupational Tax of 8% on off-premises sales of alcohol (a 10% “Liquor Drink Tax” is applied to on-premises sales of alcohol).

The 8% Beverage Occupational Tax is imposed on DtC wine shippers, which they have been collecting and remitting to the state for many years providing millions of dollars to the state’s coffers.

However, under the new economic nexus laws, certain DtC wine shippers may now face an additional tax burden.

As written, the $100,000 annual sales threshold applies to total cumulative gross receipts made by a remote seller from sales to Kansas customers. While this threshold would exclude non-taxable sales for resale (e.g., sales made by wineries to Kansas wholesalers for three-tier distribution in the state), there does not appear to be any exclusion for sales that are exempt from sales tax but are otherwise taxable, such as DtC shipped wine.

Under the law as written, a DtC wine shipper would thus face a sales tax burden once they sell over $100,000 in wine into Kansas in a year. A DtC wine shipper reaching that threshold would be required to register with the Kansas Department of Revenue and file regular sales tax returns reporting their sales into the state. While they would be able to fully exempt their wine sales from their sales tax returns (providing that they are regularly filing and remitting their Beverage Occupational Taxes), they would still be required to file a return reporting their retail sales, and collect and remit sales tax on non-wine purchases made by Kansas customers.

It is this last point that makes the new Kansas economic nexus law peculiar for DtC wine shippers. While DtC wine shippers do often sell non-wine products, such as glasses or corkscrews, the overwhelming bulk of their sales are of wine. Under the new rules, a successful DtC wine shipper could be required to regularly file a sales tax return with Kansas even though a large majority of their sales will be completely deducted from that return. Nevertheless, such are the vagaries of sales tax law, wherein subtle nuances can have broad impacts.

It must be noted that the Kansas Department of Revenue has yet to provide specific guidance on its new economic nexus law. It may turn out that they will exclude retail sales that are not subject to Kansas sales tax (like DtC shipped wine) from their economic nexus threshold. However, in the absence of specific guidance to that point, DtC wine shippers who are making over $100,000 in total sales to Kansas consumers should at least anticipate that they will need to register for Kansas sales tax in the coming months.

With the passage of SB 50 and a similar measure in Florida last month, Missouri remains the only state that does not currently have economic nexus laws in effect. Missouri is also one of the few states that does not require DtC wine shippers to assume a sales tax liability. As such, we are paying close attention to that state’s legislature as it works to establish its own economic nexus laws.

Take Action

Learn more about managing your DtC alcohol shipping compliance.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Koral

Alex Koral is Senior Regulatory Counsel for Sovos ShipCompliant in the company’s Boulder, Colorado office. He actively researches beverage alcohol regulations and market developments to inform development of Sovos’ ShipCompliant product and help educate the industry on compliance issues. Alex has been in the beverage alcohol arena since 2015, after receiving his J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School.
Share this post

alcohol deliveries
North America ShipCompliant
December 20, 2024
What if No One is Home to Sign for an Alcohol Delivery?

This blog was last updated on December 20, 2024 When no one is home to sign for an alcohol delivery, it becomes more than just a minor hiccup for direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers. It’s a domino effect that transforms a perfectly curated product into a customer’s disappointment before it’s ever opened. This becomes an even […]

taxation of motor insurance policies france
North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 18, 2024
Taxation of Motor Insurance Policies: France

This blog was last updated on December 18, 2024 France is one of the most challenging countries in Europe when it comes to the premium tax treatment of motor insurance policies. This is mainly due to the variety of taxes and charges that can apply and the differing treatment of different vehicle types. This blog […]

california bottle bill compliance
North America ShipCompliant
December 13, 2024
California Bottle Bill: Compliance Updates for Wine and Spirits

This blog was last updated on December 16, 2024 California’s bottle bill got a major upgrade earlier this year, and it’s changed the rules for wineries, distilleries and beverage distributors in a big way. For the first time, wine and spirits manufacturers will need to register with CalRecycle, report sales and pay California Redemption Value […]

unclaimed property compliance for wineries
North America ShipCompliant
December 12, 2024
Unclaimed Property Compliance: What Wineries and Wine Clubs Need to Know

This blog was last updated on December 12, 2024 Although hard to believe, unclaimed property obligations impact ALL industries, including wineries and other wine clubs. While most companies typically only associate unclaimed property with outstanding checks, including accounts payable and payroll, there are other exposures for wineries and wine clubs to consider. Understanding these risks […]

retail delivery fees for alcohol shipping
North America ShipCompliant
December 5, 2024
Navigating Retail Delivery Fees: A Guide for DtC Alcohol Sellers

This blog was last updated on December 5, 2024 Direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers are no strangers to navigating a complex regulatory landscape. However, recently, a new challenge has emerged—the rise of retail delivery fees. From excise taxes to shipping restrictions, the industry has long dealt with a maze of state-specific rules that require careful attention […]