Reciprocal Filing Equals Compliance Complaints

Sovos
December 3, 2018

If you are the one tasked with filing unclaimed property reports for your company, you may be looking for the easiest way to complete this task. For some, reciprocal filing looks like the “one and done” option – until you look a little closer. One misconception holders of unclaimed property have is filing reciprocally will help them cover all of their bases by reporting to all states at the same time. Unfortunately, that is not what actually happens when holders file reciprocally. When holders choose to report all of their unclaimed property to a single state, regardless of the owner’s last known address, several compliance issues can arise.

First, in order to be compliant, holders must file their unclaimed property reports to the state of the owners last known address within the reporting timeframe, and each state may have different due dates. If a holder reports all of their unclaimed property to one state office, but has some property that should be reported to another, records might be late by the time the first state processes the properties and sends them on to the second state. On the other hand, the records may already be late if the holder is using one state’s reporting date, and another’s due date was months before.

Second, different states may require different dormancy periods for reporting. If you are filing to a state that has a three or five-year dormancy but one of the subsequent states you are filing to only has a one-year dormancy, the shorter dormancy period properties will be late. When you consider that different states frequently have different dormancy periods for different property types, the likelihood of this type of compliance issue is high.

Third, filing reciprocally means that you have completely abandoned the reporting of your unclaimed property to the treasury department of the single state in which the last known address of the owner resides. There is no tracking number for your unclaimed property report – you will have no idea when (or if) the initial state you filed to actually sent the other states’ reports forward. You will have no audit trail, no submission number for the subsequent states, and if you are audited, you will not have compliance evidence to back you up for the second and tertiary states that you intended to file to.

Compliance issues are created when holders try to file reciprocally, but worse than that- reciprocal filing is not allowed at all by some states, and may actually flag your company for an audit. As revenue gained through unclaimed property continues to buffer state’s budgets, seeking out companies that are not in compliance to obtain fees and penalties from is becoming more and more prevalent.

Reciprocal filing may look like an easy way out of unclaimed property reporting, but it may only serve as an easy way into a compliance nightmare.

Take Action

Get in touch with a Sovos unclaimed property expert to learn more about managing your unclaimed property compliance processes.

 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sovos

Sovos is a global provider of tax, compliance and trust solutions and services that enable businesses to navigate an increasingly regulated world with true confidence. Purpose-built for always-on compliance capabilities, our scalable IT-driven solutions meet the demands of an evolving and complex global regulatory landscape. Sovos’ cloud-based software platform provides an unparalleled level of integration with business applications and government compliance processes. More than 100,000 customers in 100+ countries – including half the Fortune 500 – trust Sovos for their compliance needs. Sovos annually processes more than three billion transactions across 19,000 global tax jurisdictions. Bolstered by a robust partner program more than 400 strong, Sovos brings to bear an unrivaled global network for companies across industries and geographies. Founded in 1979, Sovos has operations across the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 18, 2024
The Impact of Climate-Related Events on Insurance Premium Tax (IPT)

Climate related events impact all industries; the insurance industry is no exception. Here’s how it’s affecting Insurance Premium Tax.

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]