SAP in Brazil: How to Avoid Penalties & Implement Successfully

Scott Lewin
May 20, 2015

While Brazil is the most complex corporate regulatory environment in the world, it’s also a very attractive country in which to do business. The emerging market’s GDP is expected to grow 22.3% between 2013 to 2017. With access to raw materials and proximity to a booming population of both talent and consumers, global businesses are opening up in Brazil en masse.

At the same time, many of these global companies are placing an increased focus on corporate governance, making significant investments into standardizing their ERP into a single, global instance. With its complex laws and regulations, implementing and maintaining SAP in Brazil can be quite a challenge. In this three part blog series and upcoming webinar, we’ll examine the challenges and best practices of implementing SAP in Brazil.

As with any SAP implementation project, the first step to executing SAP in Brazil is preparation. Unlike implementation in other countries, the SAP template in Brazil will look vastly different because of the country’s complex regulations and reporting requirements. Matching the global instance of SAP with Brazil’s unique laws is a complex process. The following are some of the considerations that must be taken into account

  • Fiscal calendar: Brazil mandates the use of fiscal calendar K4: Gregorian calendar (January to December), which may not conform to a company’s traditional fiscal year.
  • Payables/receivables: Electronic banking is the norm in Brazil, so the ERP must be configured using specific payment methods (boleto, TED – same-day electronic transfers, DOC – next-day low value transfers) to link with banks.
  • Nota Fiscal: This required document is the only way to invoice in Brazil, and must be submitted to and authorized by the Brazilian tax authority before it can be issued or paid. The SAP template must integrate the required fields, some of which aren’t included on typical invoice templates.
  • Revenue recognition: Revenue that can be recognized in Brazil varies from other parts of the world, and is based on the Nota Fiscal and receipt of goods.
  • SPED: Brazil’s e-accounting regulations require companies to submit detailed ledgers and reporting documents, so SAP must be configured to report the required numbers accurately.
  • Fixed Assets: Specific fixed asset reporting based on the Nota Fiscal database must be submitted along with other SPED reports, and needs to be documented in SAP accordingly.
  • Tax Filings: The motivation behind Brazil’s strict regulation is ensuring the country receives accurate, maximum tax payments from companies operating there. As such, it’s critical that filings match the SPED reports submitted and are backed up by government approved Nota Fiscal XML documentation.

Despite these challenges, it is imperative that companies maintain Brazilian compliance within their ERP – not using external third-party solutions and plug ins that leave them vulnerable to discrepancies, inaccuracies, manipulation and ultimately millions of dollars in fines and penalties.  In the coming weeks, we’ll explore how to implement and maintain SAP in Brazil. Join us May 28th for an in-depth look at these considerations, and the impact of Brazil’s 2015 legislation regarding electronic invoicing and fiscal reporting. Click here to register.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Scott Lewin

Gain timely insight and important up to the minute information about the current legislative changes in Latin America, including Brazil Nota Fiscal, Mexico CFDI, Argentina AFIP and Chile DTE. Learn how these changes affect your operations, your finances and also your Information Technology teams.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]