IRS Continues to Look for Crypto Investors the Hard Way

Wendy Walker
August 26, 2020

Last week, the IRS released an updated draft of the Form 1040 to be used by individual taxpayers when reporting income taxes for the 2020 calendar year. The new version contains the question about whether a taxpayer held an interest in virtual currency assets on the front page of the form.

Crypto investors and the IRS

The IRS has been trying to track down crypto investors who are not claiming income related to their trading activities for some time.The IRS reported only receivIng about 800 to 900 income tax returns claiming crypto gains from 2013 to 2015. In 2017, they issued a summons to Coinbase demanding taxpayer information for all of their clients, which resulted in the exchange turning over information for about 13,000 taxpayers. By the spring of 2018, U.S. headlines screamed of overnight millionaires as Bitcoin soared over 1,000% in value. Last summer, the IRS issued audit notices to over 10,000 crypto taxpayers that they believed were underreporting or misreporting income associated with virtual currency transactions. 

And last fall, the IRS added a question about virtual currency assets to the 2019 version of Schedule 1 – Additional Income and Adjustments to Income.

So why the change to the 1040 this year?

Previously, the question “did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?” was located on Schedule 1 – Additional Income and Adjustments to Income. This Schedule is used by taxpayers to report 1099 income outside of bank interest and dividends as well as to adjust income for certain eligible deductions (separate from itemized deductions or the standard deduction).

For 2019, a crypto investor would have needed to receive a Form 1099 from the exchange related to their crypto transactions and then would complete the Schedule 1 accordingly. However, since most exchanges do not report Form 1099 or they report the Form 1099-K which follows an extremely high federal reporting threshold, many crypto investors do not have a form that would require them to complete Schedule 1. 

As a result, many crypto investors are not required to complete Schedule 1 and therefore, the IRS is not receiving the information it intended.

By placing the question on the front page of Form 1040 however, the IRS can get information from a larger group of taxpayers about their virtual currency activity.

Why not just require 1099 reporting?

For over 30 years, the IRS has used Forms 1099, W-2, 1098 and other information returns to substantiate income and deductions made by businesses and individual taxpayers alike. Given this well-established practice of enforcing tax compliance, tax professionals (and crypto investors) continue to be baffled by the lack of clear guidance from the IRS on withholding and 1099 reporting requirements related to crypto transactions.

If businesses were required to issue Form 1099 for crypto transactions like all other U.S. businesses do for taxable transactions they make, the IRS would not need to spend resources on issuing legal summons to exchanges, auditing pockets of taxpayers one-by-one to find evaders and asking broad questions that will likely not reveal meaningful or enforceable tax information.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Wendy Walker

Wendy Walker is the principal of Tax Information Reporting solutions at Sovos. She has more than 15 years of tax operations management and tax compliance experience with emphasis in large financial institutions, having held positions with CTI Technologies (a division of IHS Markit), Zions Bancorporation and JP Morgan Chase. Wendy has served as a member of several prominent industry advisory boards. She graduated with a BS in Process Engineering from Franklin University and earned her MBA from Ohio Dominican University, in Columbus, Ohio.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]